Oracle GoldenGate Cloud Service vs TIBCO BusinessWorks comparison

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"We are heavily involved with GitHub for managing repositories, automatic deployments, and inner source projects."

"GoldenGate's best features are the desktop security features."

"Oracle GoldenGate Cloud Service is valued for its ability to replicate data in real-time, offering significant benefits from a data perspective."

"This has significantly eased the process of migration from on-premise to cloud. Instead of configuring everything from the ground up, the Oracle GoldenGate Cloud Service has made it seamless to build and render databases in cloud."

"GoldenGate can aggregate various data types from different sources."

"Oracle Database generally guarantees a good response for customer use cases."

"It provides a good response for external microservices applications."

"The tool's most valuable feature is BusinessConnect. It's an older product but still quite useful, especially for transferring files from one location to another."

"Drag and drop make it easier to build the service end to end."

"The most valuable feature is the low-code platform."

"The most valuable part of the solution is the ease-of-use and ease of deployment."

"The most valuable feature is the integration."

"One of the most valuable features is that it's a simple development. It takes a short time to get services to work."

"Customer support is very efficient."

"It is very stable. It is a market leader, and it has connectors to many of the legacy systems. It also has enterprise cloud connectors."

"Oracle GoldenGate Cloud Service lacks AI. If AI gets introduced in Oracle GoldenGate Cloud Service, it would be much easier to do analysis."

"Pricing is rather expensive. Oracle typically prices on the higher side, and there is scope for them to reconsider the price, especially since it is a cloud service."

"I am not very happy with Oracle Support. Over the past four to five years, I have experienced many problems when opening support requests."

"The initial setup was a little complex, and we required support from Oracle to complete it."

"Over the past four to five years, I have experienced many problems when opening support requests."

"Support could be improved. They lack knowledge."

"More technical documentation is needed, especially in terms of mapping and conversion of data, while integration would also be very helpful."

"Oracle is always adding new features. I can't think of anything that's urgent currently."

"The learning curve takes time compared to webMethods."

"Its price can be improved. For medium enterprises, it is a very expensive tool. In the market, you won't get many resources for this solution. You won't find many developers in the market very easily. The latest version of TIBCO (6.4 or 6.x) is not very stable. It has got many issues. We have raised this with TIBCO, and they are taking a lot of time to come up with a fix, which is making us move away from this product. Some of the performance-tuning aspects are also missing in version 6. They should provide performance-related fixes, which will be helpful for the customers. If you are migrating from the current version to the container-supported version, it is quite expensive. The product has evolved, but it is very pricey. That's one of the challenges. They have provided all the features that are there in other products, but this is a platform upgrade. The platform has completely been changed from 5.x to 6.x, and we can't use the same environment. We can't run both versions on the same server as VM. The development environment is entirely different. In version 5.x, there was a proprietary designer. Now, it has common plug-ins developed on top of Eclipse."

"Improve Business Studio's stability to further minimize development time."

"There is room for improvement on the learning side."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"The technical support's turnaround time is an area where TIBCO needs to consider improvements...Getting support from TIBCO on a particular issue takes a lot of turnaround time."

"I would like the solution to be integrated into the cloud."

"The cost of this product is too expensive for smaller companies or those with a small number of integrations."

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"TIBCO licensing is yearly and very costly for a company like ours."

"I think BusinessWorks is more expensive compared to other products. We have the ELA, so at least we have some sort of bargain or discount with that. But for a start-up, it's very expensive compared to other ESBs."

"TIBCO BusinessWorks is a very expensive solution."

"The solution is too expensive. It's one of the most expensive solutions out there, particularly because there are so many open-source competitors on the market. I don't know the exact numbers, however."

"TIBCO BusinessWorks is expensive."

"I don't have the prices of the products, but I know that TIBCO is not a cheap solution. I think that this solution is more suitable for large companies because I don't think that small- or medium-sized companies would have the money for this solution. WSO2 has the community version for free, so many of the smaller companies can use it. I'm not sure what the prices are for support, though, so I suppose the support for WSO2 is not cheap either."

"It is a bit expensive for medium-sized companies. If you are migrating from the current version to the container-supported version, it is quite expensive. The existing licensing will not work because the product platform itself is different."

"My understanding is that the licensing is very costly."