We performed a comparison between Oracle Big Data Appliance and Teradata based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Warehouse solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"Because Big Data Appliance allows me to have a single source of truth, it means I have clean data that can be monetized and leveraged to gain more insights with real-time reports from the dashboard."
"The flexibility in design is very good."
"Teradata has good performance, the response times are very fast. Overall the solution is easy to use. When we do the transformation, we have all of our staging and aggregation data available."
"The functionality of the solution is excellent."
"Teradata features high productivity and reliability because it has several redundancy options, so the system is always up and running."
"Teradata can be deployed on-premise, on the cloud, or in a virtual machine, which means customers can move without having to create their architecture all over again."
"It's very, very fast"
"The most valuable features are the large volume of data and the structuring of the data to optimize it and get very optimal data warehouse solutions for customers."
"I like this solution's ease of design and the fact that its performance is quite good. It is stable as well."
"From a technical perspective, Big Data Appliance could be improved with more innovation in the AI and machine-learning parts instead of relying on Cloudera."
"I would like to see more integration with many different types of data."
"Teradata's pricing is quite high compared to Redshift, Synapse, or GCP alternatives."
"It could use some more advanced analytics relating to structured and semi-structured data."
"I've been using the same UI for 20 years in Teradata. It could use some updating. Adding more stability around Teradata Studio would be outstanding. Teradata Studio is a Java-based version of their tool. It's much better now, but it still has some room for improvement."
"Teradata's UI could be more user-friendly."
"The solution is stable. However, there are times when we are using large amounts of data and we can see some latency issues."
"Teradata could improve by being less complicated. There are some aspects that are not available on the Unix server and a Unix system is required to access some data, such as in case of an emergency."
"Teradata needs to pay attention to the cloud-based solution to make sure it runs smoothly."
Oracle Big Data Appliance is ranked 13th in Data Warehouse with 1 review while Teradata is ranked 3rd in Data Warehouse with 16 reviews. Oracle Big Data Appliance is rated 8.0, while Teradata is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Big Data Appliance writes "Provides clean, centralized data ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata writes "Very fast with good database control and excellent support". Oracle Big Data Appliance is most compared with Oracle Exadata, Apache Hadoop, Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, IBM Integrated Analytics System and IBM Netezza Performance Server, whereas Teradata is most compared with Snowflake, Oracle Exadata, SQL Server, Vertica and Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics.
See our list of best Cloud Data Warehouse vendors and best Data Warehouse vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
