Oracle BI Applications vs webMethods.io comparison

Oracle and IBM are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. Oracle is ranked #18, while IBM is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. Oracle holds a 1.0% mindshare in BBM, compared to IBM’s 10.3% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Oracle BI Applications

Read 6 Oracle BI Applications reviews

183 Views
57 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

1,037 Views
637 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Oracle BI Applications

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

Oracle BI Applications and webMethods.io serve different business needs, with overlapping analytics capabilities. Oracle may have the upper hand due to its comprehensive data analysis suite, while webMethods.io stands out in integration and automation.

Features: Oracle BI Applications offers real-time insights and detailed dashboard customization. It excels in robust analytics and reporting capabilities with a focus on enterprise-level solutions. webMethods.io shines with seamless integration across cloud and on-premises systems, providing valuable automation solutions. It offers features like API management and a user-friendly interface for customizable integrations.

Room for Improvement: Oracle BI Applications can enhance its integration capabilities and simplify deployment procedures. More support for non-enterprise solutions could widen its market reach. webMethods.io might benefit from enhancing its analytics tools and providing more comprehensive reporting capabilities. Further improving its enterprise-level support and scalability would be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: webMethods.io provides a cloud-native deployment model that simplifies integration without complex infrastructure changes, with accessible customer service. Oracle BI Applications may require more extensive setup and support but benefits from Oracle’s vast enterprise support ecosystem.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle BI Applications involves higher setup costs suitable for large enterprises seeking advanced features, potentially offering significant ROI through complex data processing. Conversely, webMethods.io generally entails lower upfront costs with quicker ROI, focusing on connectivity and streamlined operations.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle BI Applications vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BI Applications vs. webMethods.io

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle BI Applications

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

18th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), API Management (9th), Cloud Data Integration (6th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of Oracle BI Applications is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 10.3%, up from 7.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

Rehman Mohar

Senior Manager, Software Engineering Client Reporting at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Fast calculations, stable, and good support, but needs more visuals, support for HTML5, and BI Publisher updates

It is very cumbersome and slow for making any changes. It doesn't have that many visuals to show different graphs and charts. It should have more visuals. It also doesn't support HTML5, which is useful for interactive sessions and reporting with dashboard etc. We are phasing it out because we need a newer platform that provides us more flexibility and more designs. Our use case is just to get the utility type of monthly reports, and we need visuals, customizations, columns, and certain sections on the report to show performance and other things. They are not updating their BI Publisher product, which was known as XML Publisher before Oracle bought it. It could be because they don't have that many clients using it. We are using it because we have this solution for years.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has a very robust dashboard and ad-hoc reporting."

"The most valuable features are the reporting and the graphics."

"It's web-based so that I can have multiple users accessing the same data. It provides ease of use and its formatting means we can use the data, export it to Excel, and we manipulate the data afterward if we need to."

"Calculations are a little bit faster. It can do the on-the-run calculations much better than other reporting platforms. You don't need any other specific tool. You can use Microsoft Office to start doing things with these reports."

"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."

"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."

"The solution's ease-of-use is its most valuable feature, in which complex issues may be resolved."

"The synchronous and asynchronous messaging system the solution provides is very good."

"The messaging part is the most valuable feature."

"The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)"

"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."

"High throughput and excellent scalability."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"The initial setup was complex and it took a lot of time to set up the infrastructure."

"The initial setup was difficult because not all the information was included in the implementation model."

"It is very cumbersome and slow for making any changes. It doesn't have that many visuals to show different graphs and charts. It should have more visuals. It also doesn't support HTML5, which is useful for interactive sessions and reporting with dashboard etc. We are phasing it out because we need a newer platform that provides us more flexibility and more designs. Our use case is just to get the utility type of monthly reports, and we need visuals, customizations, columns, and certain sections on the report to show performance and other things. They are not updating their BI Publisher product, which was known as XML Publisher before Oracle bought it. It could be because they don't have that many clients using it. We are using it because we have this solution for years."

"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."

"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."

"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."

"We'd like for them to open up to a more cloud-based solution that could offer more flexibility and maybe a better rules engine or more integration with rules engines."

"The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that."

"The deployment should be simplified."

"Technical support is an area where they can improve."

"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As with any case study that we’ve ever done, it’s not so much a problem with the application or security or anything of that nature. It’s basically the cost infrastructure. Compared to other solutions, it’s one of the more costly solutions out there. It’s the biggest concern nowadays that upper management has."

"It is expensive. It is more than 100K for support. You pay for support on top of the standard licensing, which is on a yearly basis."

"The solution's development license is free for three to six months. We have to pay for other things."

"webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them."

"There is a license needed to use the webMethods Integration Server."

"webMethods Integration Server is expensive, and there's no fixed price on it because it has a point pricing model. You can negotiate, which makes it interesting."

"Most of my clients would like the price of the solution to be reduced."

"The product is expensive."

"I am not involved in the licensing side of things."

"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs Oracle BI Applications

Compared 56% of the time

IBM Transformation Extender vs Oracle BI Applications

Compared 44% of the time

More Oracle BI Applications Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BI Applications

June 2025

Download Oracle BI Applications product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

May 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Oracle Business Intelligence (BI) Applications are complete, prebuilt BI solutions that deliver intuitive, role-based intelligence throughout an organization. These solutions enable organizations to gain more insight and greater value from a range of data sources, including Oracle Fusion Cloud and On-Premise Applications, E-Business Suite, PeopleSoft, JD Edwards, Siebel, and third party systems. Oracle BI Applications are built on the Oracle BI Foundation, a comprehensive and market leading BI platform. This enables organizations to realize the value of a packaged BI application, such as rapid deployment, lower TCO, and built-in best practices, all on one common BI Foundation.

Oracle

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Cox Enterprises, Lochbridge

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Oracle BI Applications vs. webMethods.io

June 2025

Free Report: Oracle BI Applications vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle BI Applications vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle BI Applications vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.