OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Testim comparison

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 10 Testim reviews

3,961 Views
2,416 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web and Testim are automated testing solutions. Testim holds the upper hand due to its advanced features and efficiency despite higher costs.

Features: OpenText provides flexible testing environments for mobile and web platforms, extensive simulation capabilities, and supports testing on real and emulated devices. Testim offers AI-driven functionalities, superior adaptability, and innovative features like smart locators, which enhance test creation and maintenance efficiency. Testim's AI capabilities provide an advanced technological edge over OpenText's platform versatility.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could improve in integrating more third-party tools, enhancing user interface design, and reducing setup complexity. Testim might focus on reducing its initial setup cost, offering more detailed documentation for complex features, and enhancing support for integrating with legacy systems to reach a wider audience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText is known for its easy deployment process and detailed documentation. However, its reliance on conventional support frameworks is noticeable. Testim also offers a streamlined deployment coupled with proactive and comprehensive onboarding support, which aids companies in quicker adaptation, distinguishing itself with superior customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText tends to have lower initial setup costs, attractive to budget-conscious users. On the other hand, Testim's higher upfront costs are justified by faster ROI due to improved testing efficiency and reduced maintenance costs, making it a more cost-effective solution over time.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Testim Report (Updated: June 2026).

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Testim

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

16th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (5th)

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

14th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 1.9%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Testim	1.9%
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	2.0%
Other	96.1%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Jyoti Mittal

Director - Quality Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Smart locators and small learning curve streamline test automation, minimizing maintenance and boosting efficiency.

Testim has a specific feature called a smart locator. Anyone experienced in test automation knows this is one of the most complex parts of developing automated scripts. The Testim feature automatically finds the locators, which helps us build stable test scripts. Stable scripts are crucial for receiving faster and more reliable feedback. I have also seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"ROI is definitely present with OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web; these are very capable tools, and there is no reason ROI should be a challenge."

"The main benefit is that you can get a very quick idea regarding the performance of your application, and it also helps you discover hidden pain points that you would not have found without using this tool."

"The ideas and possibilities that this tool has are incredibly useful."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"The solution provides a controlled device farm with the right devices (selected based on analytics), that are readily available (can be reserved), have the right app and can be used for manual or automated tests."

"The pricing is great."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"It is a highly stable solution."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

"The product is easy to use."

"We primarily use the solution for business E2E testing, as it is fast and reliable, easy to maintain, and allows for the involvement of QA as well as Dev and BA."

"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."

"The stability has been great; we can add stable tests very easily and improve our automation coverage, which allows us to deploy a new version into production every few days with minimum manual labor."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature."

"It enabled us to cover our app in end-to-end tests very quickly with quality results."

More Testim pros

Cons

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

"I think the interface is not very good and I have used other solutions that are easier to learn."

"OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web could benefit from implementing a low-code, no-code solution that aids in quick automation code preparation."

"However, in some cases we discovered some issues for HPE support regarding the latest enhancements; the delivery time for these enhancements is not as fast as we would like."

"However, it is still a young product that is improving leaps and bounds each release."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind, for instance - instead of going in and out of the editor every time I want to view test data for a test, I could just view the test data in the table, or the ability to copy steps through tests."

"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"The product could be more affordable."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

"The solution is not expensive."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Non Profit

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

What is your primary use case for Testim?

As a Quality Engineering leader, I'm responsible for testing our 20-25 applications. Manual testing is becoming increasingly challenging due to their growing scope and complexity. We've been automa...

What advice do you have for others considering Testim?

Before diving into this tool, it's highly recommended to have a basic understanding of Selenium and JavaScript. The company provides excellent training courses for free, and I strongly suggest comp...

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Comparisons

Compared 8% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

ZAPTEST vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 10% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 7% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Testim

Compared 5% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 5% of the time

LEAPWORK vs Testim

Compared 2% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

July 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Download Testim product report

July 2026

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Testim offers a comprehensive automation testing toolkit with features like smart locators and AI functionality. It supports developers and QA teams in managing testing across environments efficiently, even with UI changes.

Testim is designed for automation testing with robust features such as record and playback capabilities, a smart locator system, and a reliable algorithm to maintain stability during UI modifications. Its pre-defined tests, customizable JS testing, and accessibility features improve usability. Organizations benefit from its REST API, CLI, and shared steps, alongside AI advancements that simplify test storage and accelerate delivery times. Despite its strengths, users seek improvements in pricing, visual testing, and element selection tools, with calls for enhanced mobile app support and better report features. Multiple test runs may cause stability issues, leaving room for enhanced API integrations and more detailed documentation.

What are Testim's most important features?

Record and Playback: Simplifies test creation with easy-to-use recording tools
Smart Locator: Maintains test accuracy despite UI changes
Accessible Pre-defined Tests: Offers templates for quicker setup
AI Functionality: Enhances test case management and delivery
REST API and CLI: Facilitates integration into development workflows

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Speeds up testing processes and script automation
Usability: Intuitive interface supports both technical and non-technical users
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse web platforms and applications
Collaboration: Enhances teamwork by sharing steps across projects

Industries primarily employ Testim for automating business end-to-end tests, integrating it within complicated applications. It serves both developers and QA teams by supporting web app testing, API calls, accessibility checks, and JavaScript-focused test data. This low-code platform suits team members with varying technical expertise, adding efficiency to QA and development processes.

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality