OpenLegacy vs Tyk comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
OpenLegacy Logo
632 views|415 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Tyk Logo
2,652 views|2,057 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenLegacy and Tyk based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in API Management.
To learn more, read our detailed API Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is possible to solve larger legacy API issues on an enterprise level with this product.""Using OpenLegacy, the exposure of services is far easier and quicker. In many cases, exposure of services requires just a few clicks and takes only minutes. In very complex cases, it still only takes half a day. Without OpenLegacy, it would take us several months to create the same services.""Opens the door to connect modern web products to an old legacy system.""Using mainframe programs (not screens), the OpenLegacy services do not require any changes by the mainframe programmers, thus reducing development cycles.""The biggest advantage of OpenLegacy was how simple the technology was. We were able to build out the OpenLegacy parts very quickly. We put together a couple hundred APIs in six months.""OpenLegacy provides a way to go from the outside world to the legacy mainframe, to move the old standard application to a REST API application. New digital services can be created in a few clicks and this can be done easily by COBOL programmers.""It is possible to connect a service to a mainframe program or back transaction in a matter of minutes or hours at the most.""OpenLegacy produces a war file which includes everything you need to deploy a Tomcat server."

More OpenLegacy Pros →

"The portal for developers that this solution provides has great functionality.""The scalability is very good. That was a key factor in the selection, like how it could be pushed to high volume and scalability, which seemed to be very good.""You can set up workflows and write limited pieces of logic.""The most valuable feature is the load balancing with the circuit-breaker function.""It is a good product for API management.""The feature I find most valuable is that this solution allows us to manage our security."

More Tyk Pros →

Cons
"We would also be more than happy if the product had the option to work in the opposite direction – the ability to consume REST/SOW services in the outer world from the mainframe.""I would like to see SSL out-of-the-box. OpenLegacy certainly does SSL, but it was not the default for our use case. We are currently working with OpenLegacy to cross the SSL bridge and suspect that most users will want to do the same.""Debugging and logging for programmers could be better.""I'd like to see OpenLegacy develop its low-code/no-code (LCNC) solutions. They've expanded somewhat their horizons for integration beyond mainframe CICS, which is their sweet spot. They have some tooling in that area, but it's not as good as it needs to be.""Customer support for the product is slow and not very good. It makes using the product difficult if you need help quickly.""The pricing of the solution could be more flexible and allow for once-off payment versus annual licensing. This would be more appealing to companies in Latin America."

More OpenLegacy Cons →

"I would like to see some additional features like having some extensions for .NET core because we use it for our back-end language.""We ran it for a while, but then we decided to move away from Tyk, because Tyk's cloud version, the SaaS version, has a significant limitation of limited flexibility, so you can't program very much.""In terms of our usage, the main area of concern is that they tend to build enhancements slightly ahead of the considerations for what those enhancements and extensions are. So it could be slightly better communication with the customer base that would be my main issue with them.""We would like a better tool for generating documentation for the APIs to be developed.""Sometimes when new features are released, they are not immediately stable.""It is a young product and does not have the kind of brand recognition that would make it a more popular solution with our clients."

More Tyk Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing of the solution could be more flexible and allow for once-off payment versus annual licensing. This would be more appealing to companies in Latin America."
  • More OpenLegacy Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price is low compared to other products of a similar type."
  • "There are different versions and plans available depending on the requirements, so there is flexibility in terms of the pricing."
  • "It had a free version, which suited many of our needs, but not all, but we were happy to go ahead with the licensed version as well, which is the paid version."
  • "We are using the open-source version of this product, so there are no licensing costs for its use."
  • "The cost curve is far smoother, both in terms of volume and the number of calls it's running on, compared to most competitors. So it's a tad more expensive at the very low end, but the curve is nothing like Apigee or some of the others."
  • More Tyk Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The scalability is very good. That was a key factor in the selection, like how it could be pushed to high volume and scalability, which seemed to be very good.
    Top Answer:The pricing is actually quite competitive. In Azure environments, it gets beaten by Microsoft API Gateway, but on the other hand, it offers some features that Microsoft lacks. So it really comes down… more »
    Top Answer:In terms of our usage, the main area of concern is that they tend to build enhancements slightly ahead of the considerations for what those enhancements and extensions are. So it could be slightly… more »
    Ranking
    37th
    out of 64 in API Management
    Views
    632
    Comparisons
    415
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    17th
    out of 64 in API Management
    Views
    2,652
    Comparisons
    2,057
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    524
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Tyk
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    OpenLegacy helps organizations quickly launch innovative digital services by extending their core back-end systems to the web, mobile and cloud in days or weeks versus months. Our microservice-enabled API integration and management software quickly reduces project backlog by automating and accelerating microservices and API creation, deployment, testing and management from core applications, mainframes and databases. Together, business and IT teams can quickly, easily and securely meet consumer, partner or employee demands for digital services without modernizing or replacing core systems, and without special programming skills or invasive changes to existing systems and architectures. OpenLegacy is designed for ongoing management of microservices APIs and is based on open standards, so our software plays nice with your current technology stack and supports agile, DevOps and continuous development. Learn why leading companies choose OpenLegacy at www.openlegacy.com.

    Tyk is an open source API Gateway that is fast and scalable, an API management platform featuring an API gateway, analytics, developer portal and dashboard. Available in three flavours to best suit your architecture and governance. We offer full cloud or on-premises options, and the best of both worlds with our unique hybrid model. www.tyk.io
    Sample Customers
    Many of openLegacy's global customers are among the Global 100 companies. Review case studies in these industries: Agriculture, Airport Authority, Automotive, Auto, Finance, Insurance, Government, Healthcare, Manufacturing, and Retailwww.openlegacy.com/case-studie...
    Trip Advisor, Juniper Networks, AT&T
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Real Estate/Law Firm5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Government7%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    API Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in API Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenLegacy is ranked 37th in API Management while Tyk is ranked 17th in API Management with 6 reviews. OpenLegacy is rated 7.6, while Tyk is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of OpenLegacy writes "The biggest advantage is how simple the technology was". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tyk writes "Simple to install, has many features, but lacks support for multiple programming languages". OpenLegacy is most compared with Kong Gateway Enterprise, IBM API Connect and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, whereas Tyk is most compared with Apache APISIX, Traefik Enterprise, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and Amazon API Gateway.

    See our list of best API Management vendors.

    We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.