Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs Red Hat OpenShift comparison

Nutanix and Red Hat are both solutions in the Container Management category. Nutanix is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.4, while Red Hat is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.4. Nutanix holds a 9.0% mindshare in CM, compared to Red Hat’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Nutanix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Read 12 Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE reviews

2,845 Views
1,609 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift

Read 62 Red Hat OpenShift reviews

478 Views
51 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Red Hat OpenShift

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and Red Hat OpenShift based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Container Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs. Red Hat OpenShift Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs. Red Hat OpenShift

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Ranking in Container Management

11th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Monitoring (5th)

Red Hat OpenShift

Ranking in Container Management

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

PaaS Clouds (3rd), Server Virtualization Software (9th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (6th), Agile and DevOps Services (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is 9.0%, up from 7.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift is 1.8%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management

Featured Reviews

Prasanthraj PN

Sales Director at InnovationTQ

Offers efficient deployment and management with easy resource allocation, yet faces challenges in integration and compatibility

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE ( /products/nutanix-kubernetes-engine-nke-reviews ) offers easy and fast deployment, management, stability, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. The resource allocation is very simple. If we need to expand the memory, storage space, or processor core, it is very easy to manage through our central control. These features are what stand out the most.

Read full review

Pratul Shukla

Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Adopting a flexible and efficient approach with noticeable improvements in operational costs and continued challenges in job management

Currently, one of the biggest challenges we face is with services and jobs. For spawning batches, although it has crons, it is not easy to integrate with enterprise systems such as Autosys. The entire company uses Autosys, but we are not able to integrate it effectively. We need intermediate servers to run OC utility commands and initiate the cron job. We have to do a lot of modifications to ensure our batches work properly. With physical or virtual servers, even in AWS, we are able to write and manage multiple jobs. Managing batches in Red Hat OpenShift has been a significant challenge. Integrating third parties is a challenge with Red Hat OpenShift. For example, with Elasticsearch, onboarding itself was difficult, running file beats and dealing with routing issues. It is not straightforward, especially since we have some components in AWS as. AWS has many capabilities that come out of the box and are easier to work with compared to Red Hat OpenShift. Red Hat OpenShift's biggest disadvantage is they do not provide any private cloud setup where we can host on our site using their services. The main reason we went with Red Hat OpenShift was because it is a private cloud, and we have regulatory requirements that prevent us from using public cloud.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution provides no downtime features. If we face issues, we create a new port, deploy it there, and then drop the existing one. This way, we avoid NKE downtime on our website."

"Nutanix's support is really good."

"The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase."

"We can add some add-ons and plugins to the product if we need to."

"We can do a lot of provisioning."

"The platform is valuable due to its ease of use and quick deployment capabilities."

"The solution is embedded in the hypervisor and there are no deployment costs."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE pros

"We want to build a solution that can be deployable to any cloud because of client requirements and OpenShift allows us to do this."

"The most valuable feature is the high availability for the applications."

"OpenShift offers robust tools for monitoring application traffic, allowing us to analyze client requests and other business-related metrics."

"This solution helps us to account for peak seasons involving higher demand than usual. It also gives us confidence in the security of our overall systems."

"The initial setup is simple, and OpenShift is open-source, so it's easy to install on any cloud platform."

"We are currently dealing with both local support and Red Hat support, and they have been amazing."

"Key features are WildFly, because it standardizes infrastructure and the git repository and docker. Git is essential for source code and Docker for infrastructure."

"OpenShift's superior dashboard is a notable strength, especially when compared to Kubernetes."

More Red Hat OpenShift pros

Cons

"There have been challenges related to software bugs, especially regarding long-term licensing options and issues within our customer network."

"One major issue we faced was that appliances couldn't migrate from VMware to the tool. However, this seems to be a common problem across platforms. We've seen the same issue when migrating from VMware to RHV or other solutions. It's not specifically a Nutanix problem but rather an issue migrating appliances from one VM infrastructure to another. Some kernel-level and storage-level issues impact this process."

"We need a backup of production clusters."

"GUI lacks sufficient information to help with understanding the installation and process."

"I would like to have more nodes for availability and storage."

"In the next release, I would like to have automatic dynamic scaling, both upscaling and downscaling."

"The product lacks some virtualization capabilities, making it an area for improvement where the solution can focus on providing users with more virtualization capabilities related to disk systems."

"Nutanix has limitations compared to VMware, particularly in testing and industry tie-ups with different OEMs. Deploying virtual machines, especially for industrial automation, can be challenging due to compatibility issues."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE cons

"I had to frequently upgrade my cluster due to OpenShift's rolling updates every six months, which I found to be excessive."

"OpenShift requires a very expensive and complex infrastructure. These demands can deter people from learning OpenShift."

"There are challenges related to additional security layers, connectivity compliance for endpoints, and integration."

"Documentation and technical support could be improved. The product is good, but when we raise a case with support—say we are having an image issue—the support is not really up to the mark. It is difficult to get support... When we raise a case, their support people will hesitate to get on a call or a screen-sharing session. That is a major drawback when it comes to OpenShift."

"Latency and performance are two areas of concern in OpenShift where improvements are required."

"Needs work on volume handling (although this is already better with GlusterFS). Security (SSSD) would also be an improvement."

"OpenShift's storage management could be better."

"Room for improvement is around the offerings that come as a bundle with the container platform. The packaging of the platform should be done such that customers do not have to purchase additional licenses."

More Red Hat OpenShift cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's licenses are included in the software version deployed in our data center."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"While deploying Kubernetes clusters on Nutanix is cost-effective, there may be additional costs for remote branch offices where Kubernetes is less common."

"The platform is averagely priced. I rate the pricing as four out of ten."

"I rate NKE's pricing a six out of ten."

"My company makes payments towards the licensing costs attached to OpenShift."

"The model of pricing and buying licences is quite rigid. We are in the process of negotiating on demand pricing which will help us take advantage of the cloud as a whole."

"This solution is fairly expensive but comes at an average cost compared to other solutions in the market."

"The solution is cost-effective."

"We are currently using the open version, OKD. We plan to get the enterprise version in the future."

"The cost is quite high."

"I don't deal with the cost part, but I know that the cost is very high when compared to other products. They charge for CPU and memory, but we don't worry about it."

"OpenShift is really good when we need to start, but once we get to a certain scale, it becomes too expensive."

More Red Hat OpenShift pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

30%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

Nutanix has limitations compared to VMware, particularly in testing and industry tie-ups with different OEMs. Deploying virtual machines, especially for industrial automation, can be challenging du...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

We are using Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE ( /products/nutanix-kubernetes-engine-nke-reviews ) in our organization. It is implemented on Cisco M7 ( /products/oracle-supercluster-reviews ) Series ( ...

See all answers

How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?

Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...

See all answers

Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?

Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...

See all answers

What do you like most about OpenShift?

OpenShift facilitates DevOps practices and improves CI/CD workflows in terms of stability compared to Jenkins.

See all answers

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 37% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 20% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 12% of the time

Kubernetes vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 10% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 6% of the time

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Competitors

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 16% of the time

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 8% of the time

Google Cloud vs Red Hat OpenShift

Compared 7% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

May 2025

Download Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat OpenShift

May 2025

Download Red Hat OpenShift product report

Also Known As

Nutanix Karbon

No data available

Overview

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) is an enterprise Kubernetes management solution that simplifies provisioning, operations, and lifecycle management of Kubernetes.

Nutanix

Red Hat OpenShift offers a robust, scalable platform with strong security and automation, suitable for container orchestration, application deployment, and microservices architecture.

Designed to modernize applications by transitioning from legacy systems to cloud-native environments, Red Hat OpenShift provides powerful CI/CD integration and Kubernetes compatibility. Its security features, multi-cloud support, and source-to-image functionality enhance deployment flexibility. While the GUI offers user-friendly navigation, users benefit from its cloud-agnostic nature and efficient lifecycle management. However, improvements are needed in documentation, configuration complexity, and integration with third-party platforms. Pricing and high resource demands can also be challenging for wider adoption.

What are the key features of Red Hat OpenShift?

Security: Comprehensive security features ensure safe deployments and operations.
Scalability: Auto-scaling and monitoring capabilities cater to high-demand environments.
CI/CD Integration: Seamless integration for efficient continuous deployment processes.
Cloud Compatibility: Supports multi-cloud and on-premise solutions with ease.
GUI: Simplifies platform management and enhances usability.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlined operations reduce time and resource investments.
Enhanced Flexibility: Adapt quickly to changing demands and environments.
Quick Deployment: Fast application deployment supports agile project timelines.
Robust Support: Access to dependable customer support services.

Red Hat OpenShift is strategically implemented for diverse industries focusing on container orchestration and application modernization. Organizations leverage it for migrating applications to cloud-native environments and managing CI/CD pipelines. Its functionality facilitates efficient resource management and microservices architecture adoption, supporting enterprise-level DevOps practices. Users employ it across cloud and on-premises platforms to drive performance improvements.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

UPS, Cathay Pacific, Hilton

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs. Red Hat OpenShift

June 2025

Free Report: Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs. Red Hat OpenShift

Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs. Red Hat OpenShift and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs. Red Hat OpenShift report.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.