NowSecure vs OWASP Zap comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
NowSecure Logo
566 views|356 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OWASP Logo
21,564 views|10,271 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NowSecure and OWASP Zap based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the ability to download an application without actually putting in the APK. It gives us an option to put the APK in if we want to but we can download it from the App Store and Play Store."

More NowSecure Pros →

"The application scanning feature is the most valuable feature.""The scalability of this product is very good.""The reporting is quite intuitive, which gives you a clear indication of what kind of vulnerability you have that you can drill down on to gather more information.""The vulnerabilities that it finds, because the primary goal is to secure applications and websites.""We use the solution for security testing.""The solution is good at reporting the vulnerabilities of the application.""Automatic scanning is a valuable feature and very easy to use.""It can be used effectively for internal auditing."

More OWASP Zap Pros →

Cons
"In this solution, there are two kinds of testing, static analysis, and dynamic analysis. There needs some improvement in testing with dynamic analysis because I have found it is not accurate"

More NowSecure Cons →

"I prefer Burp Suite to SWASP Zap because of the extensive coverage it offers.""They stopped their support for a short period. They've recently started to come back again. In the early days, support was much better.""It needs more robust reporting tools.""Reporting format has no output, is cluttered and very long.""It would be beneficial to enhance the algorithm to provide better summaries of automatic scanning results.""It doesn't run on absolutely every operating system.""The technical support team must be proactive.""The automated vulnerability assessments that the application performs needs to be simplified as well as diversified."

More OWASP Zap Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is highly recommended as it is an open source tool."
  • "It's free and open, currently under the Apache 2 license. If ZAP does what you need it to do, selling a free solution is a very easy."
  • "OWASP ZAP is a free tool provided by OWASP’s engineers and experts. There is an option to donate."
  • "As Zap is free and open-source, with tons of features similar to those of commercial solutions, I would definitely recommend trying it out."
  • "It's free. It's good for us because we don't know what the extent of our use will be yet. It's good to start with something free and easy to use."
  • "OWASP Zap is free to use."
  • "This app is completely free and open source. So there is no question about any pricing."
  • "This is an open-source solution and can be used free of charge."
  • More OWASP Zap Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with… more »
    Top Answer:The ZAP scan and code crawler are valuable features.
    Ranking
    Views
    566
    Comparisons
    356
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    21,564
    Comparisons
    10,271
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    372
    Rating
    7.4
    Comparisons
    Veracode logo
    Compared 25% of the time.
    Data Theorem API Secure  logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    GitLab logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Acunetix logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Checkmarx One logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Learn More
    NowSecure
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    NowSecure experts have conducted advanced pen testing for some of the world's most demanding organizations - including banks, insurance companies, government agencies, healthcare organizations, retail conglomerates, high-tech businesses, and more. Mobile apps are prone to sensitive data leakages and attacks, yet a manual test for just one app can take several weeks. To enable faster, more frequent testing, we built a test engine that successfully automates repeatable and time-consuming mobile appsec testing, remediation and reporting tasks. The result - the foundation of the NowSecure platform, which significantly reduces testing time and costs without compromising full depth of security coverage.

    OWASP Zap is a free and open-source web application security scanner. 

    The solution helps developers identify vulnerabilities in their web applications by actively scanning for common security issues. 

    With its user-friendly interface and powerful features, Zap is a popular choice among developers for ensuring the security of their web applications.

    Sample Customers
    Vaporstream, FIS, MEA Financial, Silent Circle, Capital One, Citi, EY, EMC, Emerson, Kaiser Permanente, The Home Depot, Humana, Shell, Kellogg's, TD Bank, VMware
    1. Google 2. Microsoft 3. IBM 4. Amazon 5. Facebook 6. Twitter 7. LinkedIn 8. Netflix 9. Adobe 10. PayPal 11. Salesforce 12. Cisco 13. Oracle 14. Intel 15. HP 16. Dell 17. VMware 18. Symantec 19. McAfee 20. Citrix 21. Red Hat 22. Juniper Networks 23. SAP 24. Accenture 25. Deloitte 26. Ernst & Young 27. PwC 28. KPMG 29. Capgemini 30. Infosys 31. Wipro 32. TCS
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Insurance Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Retailer10%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise64%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Testing (AST)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    NowSecure is ranked 32nd in Application Security Testing (AST) while OWASP Zap is ranked 8th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 37 reviews. NowSecure is rated 7.0, while OWASP Zap is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of NowSecure writes "Scalable and reliable, but dynamic analysis needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OWASP Zap writes "Great for automating and testing and has tightened our security ". NowSecure is most compared with Veracode, Data Theorem API Secure , GitLab, Acunetix and Checkmarx One, whereas OWASP Zap is most compared with SonarQube, Acunetix, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional, Qualys Web Application Scanning and Veracode.

    See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.