Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NIKSUN NetVCR vs Plixer Scrutinizer comparison

NIKSUN and Plixer are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. NIKSUN is ranked #98, while Plixer is ranked #54 with an average rating of 8.0. NIKSUN holds a 0.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to Plixer’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Plixer users are willing to recommend the solution.
NIKSUN NetVCR
Read 2 NIKSUN NetVCR reviews
  • 244 Views
  • 94 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
Plixer Scrutinizer
Read 15 Plixer Scrutinizer reviews
  • 971 Views
  • 306 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Plixer Scrutinizer and NIKSUN NetVCR compete in the network analysis space. Plixer Scrutinizer has the edge in affordability and customer support, while NIKSUN NetVCR is preferred for its extensive features.

Features: Plixer Scrutinizer offers comprehensive traffic analysis, intuitive dashboards, and effective threat detection. NIKSUN NetVCR provides deep packet inspection, real-time data capture, and extensive data analysis capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Plixer Scrutinizer could enhance its data inspection depth, expand feature sets, and improve advanced analytics. NIKSUN NetVCR could focus on simplifying deployment, reducing initial cost, and enhancing the ease of use for various environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Plixer Scrutinizer features a straightforward deployment process and strong customer service, suitable for organizations of all sizes. NIKSUN NetVCR, while requiring a more complex setup, provides excellent customer support once deployed.

Pricing and ROI: Plixer Scrutinizer is known for its cost-effective setup with good ROI. NIKSUN NetVCR, although having higher initial costs, delivers significant ROI through its comprehensive features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed NIKSUN NetVCR vs. Plixer Scrutinizer Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
NIKSUN NetVCR vs. Plixer Scrutinizer
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NIKSUN NetVCR
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
98th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Plixer Scrutinizer
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
54th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of NIKSUN NetVCR is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Plixer Scrutinizer is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Himanshu Shah - PeerSpot reviewer
High performance, quick packet monitoring, and helpful support
The solution could improve by having automatic mitigation. For example, as soon as a problem occurs the solution alarms and mitigates the situation immediately. In a feature release of the solution they should add features related to automation and remediation. Automation would help increase level of security the solution provides.
Read full review
Ira Mulyanti - PeerSpot reviewer
An affordable product with great integration capabilities
Plixer Core Platform is a valuable feature and a good software. Plixer Scrutinizer uses NetFlow analysis to monitor whatever is there in a network. Price-wise, Plixer Scrutinizer is not an expensive product. Basically, Plixer Scrutinizer is an affordable product. Plixer Scrutinizer is a tool that allows for customization, especially in scenarios where customers need new product features. Plixer Scrutinizer is a tool that can integrate with any other brand or product in the market, so it is not an area of concern.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features of NIKSUN NetVCR are its performance and forensic capabilities. Additionally, the information that the solution provides is highly detailed and useful. When dealing with network traffic packets can be sent at a high speed causing some security issues, but this solution is able to rapidly monitor the packets providing security."
"The unique selling point of NIKSUN is its ability to scale and its reporting capabilities. NIKSUN captures the packets at a very high speed, from one GB to 160 Gbps also. It offers report granularity in nanoseconds."
"One of the most valuable features of Plixer Scrutinizer is the reporting, particularly how easy it is to drill down into the reports. Another valuable feature of the solution is its overall visibility. It's great. I also liked Plixer Scrutinizer in terms of deployment time and that it's very simple to set up. Once you get the appliance set up and connected, the customer starts to see results immediately, versus other solutions where that could take a while."
"There are other tools out there that will do what Scrutinizer does. But what I have found with Scrutinizer is that it does it very quickly. I've taken 25 million individual data fragments from the different sensors, and it has graphed that and mapped it and presented a picture within 30 seconds. It has a very efficient database algorithm that I am really impressed with."
"We have had many requests to understand in the network which devices are connected to others. Most people don't have this information or are able to establish a map of data flow everywhere around the network. Scrutinizer can really help with this. We are using it to understand who is talking to what, how, and which protocols can help us to improve security and analyze flow."
"The reporting and generating troubleshooting reports would be the best feature; our host-to-host conversation reporting."
"Visualization of the network traffic is the most valuable feature. It allows you to drill into information quite quickly."
"As a network engineer, the ability to identify what traffic on the link is consuming all the bandwidth at any given time, and provide immediate feedback to the business, is the most valuable feature."
"One feature I found most valuable in Plixer Scrutinizer is the very extensive reporting. Reporting is very flexible, though sometimes you need a little bit of support from Plixer Scrutinizer to create custom-made reporting in a very short time. Reporting is a very strong feature of the product."
"The ability to view the status of the top-10 at a glance is helpful. We immediately know which link is over-utilized or heavily used... and it's all in real-time."
More Plixer Scrutinizer pros
 

Cons

"NIKSUN is a passive solution. It provides you with you data, alerts, reports and the root cause of issues. However, it requires a person to make use of this functionality. If an event is happening and nobody attends to it, the effects of the event could be severe."
"The solution could improve by having automatic mitigation. For example, as soon as a problem occurs the solution alarms and mitigates the situation immediately."
"There is room for improvement around the data that they have on the website about solutions... they should have more templated solutions on their website. Going out and identifying how to do RTP performance with a Cisco router, or how to do application response times in an Arrista data center deployment was where most of the work was... They should spend some more time documenting solutions and putting together white papers."
"We couldn't get it set up properly."
"For updating the Scrutinizer platform, when we have the actual data, it never happens in one day. Every time we have the data, we are obliged to install a new server in order to integrate the old data, and every time it has a problem. Most of the time, we were obliged to scrap all the data because we couldn't transfer it to the new server. So, it would be very good if they could improve this part."
"In Plixer Scrutinizer, scalability is an area with minor concerns where improvements are required."
"Though Plixer Scrutinizer has network detection and response, it's an area that needs just a little more rounding out. Another room for improvement in the solution is its lack of SaaS offering which some customers were looking for. My company deals in small to medium businesses, mid-market, and some customers wanted the SaaS feature which Plixer Scrutinizer doesn't offer. What I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is for it to have a SaaS offering because my company also deals with educational spaces and smaller businesses that just don't have the staff that can implement this. If there's either a managed service or SaaS-based offering to just make it a little easier for those types of customers, it would be a great addition to Plixer Scrutinizer."
"The reporting structure, the front-end GUI, also needs some work. It needs some getting used to. It works fairly well, but it's a technical tool rather than a user tool. You have to understand the structure of the databases before you can really use it."
"It would be useful if there was a way to back up the configuration information. E.g., if you wanted to deploy a new instance or disaster recovery, you could quite easily deploy and restore the config, as opposed to having to restore all the NetFlow data. If there was just a button that said "backup config information", that would be good."
"They're working on the security areas, so it can provide more insight. What they have is still pretty much IP-concentric. If they were to make it IP and URL, they'd be a little bit ahead on that."
More Plixer Scrutinizer cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is high. There is an annual license costs."
"Our entire solution, amortized over five years, is in the vicinity of $40,000 to $50,000 a year."
"I rate Plixer Scrutinizer's price a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price or affordable, and ten is high price or expensive."
"We just renewed. The pricing is 5,000 euro per year. This is the final price. All tax (20 percent) is included."
"Currently, the license for Plixer Scrutinizer is subscription-based and at a yearly fee. The price would depend on the amount of traffic you pull in. For example, there are several blocks from a 10K flow, a 40K flow, and a 100K flow, and based on the number of devices that you receive the flows from, that's the license, and it is not a per-interface pricing model, so that is a very strong, very competitive pricing feature of Plixer Scrutinizer. Licensing for the product is also not based on the number of storage, compared to some competing products that are priced based on the amount of storage you need, particularly based on the retention and the amount of data. Plixer Scrutinizer licensing is based on the device, and it's more in the direction of $10,000 because, with just $1,000, you don't have anything."
"It's about €10,000 a year for initial license and yearly maintenance costs. In addition, the hardware costs are about €10,000 once every five years."
"There is a recurring maintenance fee after the initial purchase or if we want the license upgrade."
"Compared to some of the other tools we have, it's incredibly reasonably priced."
"The licensing cost for Plixer Scrutinizer is in the middle. It's not the cheapest, but it's not the most expensive. Its licensing model is based on how many exporters, how many devices export information to the system. Plixer Scrutinizer has different modules you could add such as the security module which would cost extra."
More Plixer Scrutinizer pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Plixer Scrutinizer?
Plixer Scrutinizer is an affordable product. Plixer Scrutinizer is a tool that allows for customization, especially in scenarios where customers need new product features.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Plixer Scrutinizer?
I rate Plixer Scrutinizer's price a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price or affordable, and ten is high price or expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Plixer Scrutinizer?
I don't have deep enough knowledge to comment on what requires improvements in Plixer Scrutinizer. In Plixer Scrutinizer, scalability is an area with minor concerns where improvements are required.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs NIKSUN NetVCR Logo
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs NIKSUN NetVCR
Compared 52% of the time
Pico Corvil Analytics vs NIKSUN NetVCR Logo
Pico Corvil Analytics vs NIKSUN NetVCR
Compared 48% of the time
More NIKSUN NetVCR Competitors
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Plixer Scrutinizer Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Plixer Scrutinizer
Compared 24% of the time
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer vs Plixer Scrutinizer Logo
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer vs Plixer Scrutinizer
Compared 23% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs Plixer Scrutinizer Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs Plixer Scrutinizer
Compared 17% of the time
Kentik vs Plixer Scrutinizer Logo
Kentik vs Plixer Scrutinizer
Compared 15% of the time
LogicMonitor vs Plixer Scrutinizer Logo
LogicMonitor vs Plixer Scrutinizer
Compared 12% of the time
More Plixer Scrutinizer Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
May 2025
NIKSUN NetVCR reportDownload NIKSUN NetVCR product report
Buyer's Guide
Plixer Scrutinizer
June 2025
Plixer Scrutinizer reportDownload Plixer Scrutinizer product report
 

Also Known As

NetVCR
No data available
 

Overview

Powered by groundbreaking technologies, NIKSUN NetVCR redefines the way we monitor networks. It provides seamless service and application performance analytics for the right visibility into your traditional, virtual or hybrid environments. The NetVCR suite gives you unmatched insight while still dramatically reducing power consumption by 60% and requiring 80% less rack space.

NIKSUN

The Scrutinizer incident response system leverages network traffic analytics to provide active monitoring, visualization, and reporting of network and security incidents. The system quickly delivers the rich forensic data needed by IT professionals to support fast and efficient incident response.

Plixer
 

Sample Customers

Visa, FedEx, CitiGroup, IDC
Oxford Networks, Squaw Valley Ski Holdings, UltiSat, Wipro, West Aurora School District 129, SUNY Geneseo College, Bloomington Public Schools, First National Bank of Pennsylvania, Kitsap Credit Union, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Houston Texas, Carilion Clinic, Banner Health, IDEXX Laboratories, Phibro Animal Health Corporation, Goodwill Industries, Parmalat, Armstrong Coal Company, Flybe, James Walker
Buyer's Guide
NIKSUN NetVCR vs. Plixer Scrutinizer
June 2025
Free Report: NIKSUN NetVCR vs. Plixer Scrutinizer
Find out what your peers are saying about NIKSUN NetVCR vs. Plixer Scrutinizer and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our NIKSUN NetVCR vs. Plixer Scrutinizer report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.