Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NIKSUN NetVCR vs Plixer Scrutinizer comparison

NIKSUN and Plixer are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. NIKSUN is ranked #99, while Plixer is ranked #55 with an average rating of 8.0. NIKSUN holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to Plixer’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Plixer users are willing to recommend the solution.
NIKSUN NetVCR
Read 2 NIKSUN NetVCR reviews
  • 246 Views
  • 241 Comparison Views
0% willing to recommend
Plixer Scrutinizer
Read 15 Plixer Scrutinizer reviews
  • 1,343 Views
  • 927 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Plixer Scrutinizer and NIKSUN NetVCR compete in the network analysis space. Plixer Scrutinizer has the edge in affordability and customer support, while NIKSUN NetVCR is preferred for its extensive features.

Features: Plixer Scrutinizer offers comprehensive traffic analysis, intuitive dashboards, and effective threat detection. NIKSUN NetVCR provides deep packet inspection, real-time data capture, and extensive data analysis capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Plixer Scrutinizer could enhance its data inspection depth, expand feature sets, and improve advanced analytics. NIKSUN NetVCR could focus on simplifying deployment, reducing initial cost, and enhancing the ease of use for various environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Plixer Scrutinizer features a straightforward deployment process and strong customer service, suitable for organizations of all sizes. NIKSUN NetVCR, while requiring a more complex setup, provides excellent customer support once deployed.

Pricing and ROI: Plixer Scrutinizer is known for its cost-effective setup with good ROI. NIKSUN NetVCR, although having higher initial costs, delivers significant ROI through its comprehensive features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed NIKSUN NetVCR vs. Plixer Scrutinizer Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
NIKSUN NetVCR vs. Plixer Scrutinizer
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NIKSUN NetVCR
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
99th
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Plixer Scrutinizer
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
55th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of NIKSUN NetVCR is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Plixer Scrutinizer is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Himanshu Shah - PeerSpot reviewer
High performance, quick packet monitoring, and helpful support
The solution could improve by having automatic mitigation. For example, as soon as a problem occurs the solution alarms and mitigates the situation immediately. In a feature release of the solution they should add features related to automation and remediation. Automation would help increase level of security the solution provides.
Read full review
Ira Mulyanti - PeerSpot reviewer
An affordable product with great integration capabilities
Plixer Core Platform is a valuable feature and a good software. Plixer Scrutinizer uses NetFlow analysis to monitor whatever is there in a network. Price-wise, Plixer Scrutinizer is not an expensive product. Basically, Plixer Scrutinizer is an affordable product. Plixer Scrutinizer is a tool that allows for customization, especially in scenarios where customers need new product features. Plixer Scrutinizer is a tool that can integrate with any other brand or product in the market, so it is not an area of concern.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The unique selling point of NIKSUN is its ability to scale and its reporting capabilities. NIKSUN captures the packets at a very high speed, from one GB to 160 Gbps also. It offers report granularity in nanoseconds."
"The most valuable features of NIKSUN NetVCR are its performance and forensic capabilities. Additionally, the information that the solution provides is highly detailed and useful. When dealing with network traffic packets can be sent at a high speed causing some security issues, but this solution is able to rapidly monitor the packets providing security."
"We didn't experience any bugs."
"The reporting and generating troubleshooting reports would be the best feature; our host-to-host conversation reporting."
"One of the most valuable features of Plixer Scrutinizer is the reporting, particularly how easy it is to drill down into the reports. Another valuable feature of the solution is its overall visibility. It's great. I also liked Plixer Scrutinizer in terms of deployment time and that it's very simple to set up. Once you get the appliance set up and connected, the customer starts to see results immediately, versus other solutions where that could take a while."
"Plixer Scrutinizer is an affordable product. Plixer Scrutinizer is a tool that allows for customization, especially in scenarios where customers need new product features."
"The solution helps to enrich the data context of our network traffic. It allows me to see what applications are most in use on a slightly historical basis, going back a day or week at tops. It allows me to tune QoS or traffic shaping around what's being used. It saves me from having to unnecessarily upgrade, if I don't need to."
"It shows us the saturation of the network of devices. It gives us a clear view of the flows in the network to understand, for instance, planning upgrades in the network to get an idea of what's going on the network on traffic flows. It gives us insight, for instance, on what's going on on our VPN Client. There are a lot of things where it provides very helpful information. It also gives us our security reports with quite detailed information on what's going on in the network, and whether there are data exfiltrations and so on."
"We have had many requests to understand in the network which devices are connected to others. Most people don't have this information or are able to establish a map of data flow everywhere around the network. Scrutinizer can really help with this. We are using it to understand who is talking to what, how, and which protocols can help us to improve security and analyze flow."
"One feature I found most valuable in Plixer Scrutinizer is the very extensive reporting. Reporting is very flexible, though sometimes you need a little bit of support from Plixer Scrutinizer to create custom-made reporting in a very short time. Reporting is a very strong feature of the product."
More Plixer Scrutinizer pros
 

Cons

"NIKSUN is a passive solution. It provides you with you data, alerts, reports and the root cause of issues. However, it requires a person to make use of this functionality. If an event is happening and nobody attends to it, the effects of the event could be severe."
"The solution could improve by having automatic mitigation. For example, as soon as a problem occurs the solution alarms and mitigates the situation immediately."
"The reporting structure, the front-end GUI, also needs some work. It needs some getting used to. It works fairly well, but it's a technical tool rather than a user tool. You have to understand the structure of the databases before you can really use it."
"They're working on the security areas, so it can provide more insight. What they have is still pretty much IP-concentric. If they were to make it IP and URL, they'd be a little bit ahead on that."
"It would be useful if there was a way to back up the configuration information. E.g., if you wanted to deploy a new instance or disaster recovery, you could quite easily deploy and restore the config, as opposed to having to restore all the NetFlow data. If there was just a button that said "backup config information", that would be good."
"The visual acuity of how it presents data can sometimes be confusing. It takes a bit for people to spin up how to look at the graphs."
"From what I understand it is that the solution is not very scalable in a high volume traffic environment with a large number of flows."
"There was a price lift because previously the product was privately owned, and now there is some external capital in the organization, so pricing could be lower, though, for Plixer Scrutinizer, there is almost no competition at this price point."
"The solution creates a visual map of a particular location and how the network flows. You need to spend time to generate all those maps. If they could figure out a way to reduce the time needed to generate the maps, that would be great."
"Knowing that they're coming out with a new user interface, that is an area where there is room for improvement. There are so many variables. They should limit the variables in the user interface and create some classes, like "simple," "novice," and "expert" to narrow down the variables within it."
More Plixer Scrutinizer cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is high. There is an annual license costs."
"The licensing cost for Plixer Scrutinizer is in the middle. It's not the cheapest, but it's not the most expensive. Its licensing model is based on how many exporters, how many devices export information to the system. Plixer Scrutinizer has different modules you could add such as the security module which would cost extra."
"We pay our one-off cost for the licenses, per device, in blocks of 50. And then we pay an annual maintenance fee of about $15,000 Australian, which is, at this point in time, about $9,000 US, for those 250 devices. The upfront costs for the 250-license use, were about $50,000 Australian, which is about $32,000 US."
"I rate Plixer Scrutinizer's price a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price or affordable, and ten is high price or expensive."
"We recently bought a license upgrade, so we will integrate more exporters. We upgraded from a 25 exporter license to a 50 exporter license. Therefore, there will be more flows, and this will be an extension. I don't know when we will purchase a faster server, because the server that we have is quite new."
"The license is per device. We have 50 devices."
"Our entire solution, amortized over five years, is in the vicinity of $40,000 to $50,000 a year."
"Compared to some of the other tools we have, it's incredibly reasonably priced."
"It's about €10,000 a year for initial license and yearly maintenance costs. In addition, the hardware costs are about €10,000 once every five years."
More Plixer Scrutinizer pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Plixer Scrutinizer?
Plixer Scrutinizer is an affordable product. Plixer Scrutinizer is a tool that allows for customization, especially in scenarios where customers need new product features.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Plixer Scrutinizer?
I rate Plixer Scrutinizer's price a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price or affordable, and ten is high price or expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Plixer Scrutinizer?
I don't have deep enough knowledge to comment on what requires improvements in Plixer Scrutinizer. In Plixer Scrutinizer, scalability is an area with minor concerns where improvements are required.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Pico Corvil Analytics vs NIKSUN NetVCR Logo
Pico Corvil Analytics vs NIKSUN NetVCR
Compared 63% of the time
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs NIKSUN NetVCR Logo
NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs NIKSUN NetVCR
Compared 37% of the time
More NIKSUN NetVCR Competitors
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer vs Plixer Scrutinizer Logo
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer vs Plixer Scrutinizer
Compared 25% of the time
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Plixer Scrutinizer Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Plixer Scrutinizer
Compared 22% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs Plixer Scrutinizer Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs Plixer Scrutinizer
Compared 17% of the time
Kentik vs Plixer Scrutinizer Logo
Kentik vs Plixer Scrutinizer
Compared 16% of the time
LogicMonitor vs Plixer Scrutinizer Logo
LogicMonitor vs Plixer Scrutinizer
Compared 11% of the time
More Plixer Scrutinizer Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
August 2025
NIKSUN NetVCR reportDownload NIKSUN NetVCR product report
Buyer's Guide
Plixer Scrutinizer
August 2025
Plixer Scrutinizer reportDownload Plixer Scrutinizer product report
 

Also Known As

NetVCR
No data available
 

Overview

Powered by groundbreaking technologies, NIKSUN NetVCR redefines the way we monitor networks. It provides seamless service and application performance analytics for the right visibility into your traditional, virtual or hybrid environments. The NetVCR suite gives you unmatched insight while still dramatically reducing power consumption by 60% and requiring 80% less rack space.

NIKSUN

The Scrutinizer incident response system leverages network traffic analytics to provide active monitoring, visualization, and reporting of network and security incidents. The system quickly delivers the rich forensic data needed by IT professionals to support fast and efficient incident response.

Plixer
 

Sample Customers

Visa, FedEx, CitiGroup, IDC
Oxford Networks, Squaw Valley Ski Holdings, UltiSat, Wipro, West Aurora School District 129, SUNY Geneseo College, Bloomington Public Schools, First National Bank of Pennsylvania, Kitsap Credit Union, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Houston Texas, Carilion Clinic, Banner Health, IDEXX Laboratories, Phibro Animal Health Corporation, Goodwill Industries, Parmalat, Armstrong Coal Company, Flybe, James Walker
Buyer's Guide
NIKSUN NetVCR vs. Plixer Scrutinizer
July 2025
Free Report: NIKSUN NetVCR vs. Plixer Scrutinizer
Find out what your peers are saying about NIKSUN NetVCR vs. Plixer Scrutinizer and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our NIKSUN NetVCR vs. Plixer Scrutinizer report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.