Splunk AppDynamics and Nagios Core both compete in the IT monitoring space. Splunk AppDynamics has an advantage in application performance monitoring, while Nagios Core is better suited for network and server monitoring.
Features: Splunk AppDynamics offers features such as stack trace visibility, transaction snapshots, and multi-tier correlation analysis, providing advanced monitoring for Java, PHP, and databases. Nagios Core specializes in server and network monitoring, with capabilities for high configurability and extensibility.
Room for Improvement: Splunk AppDynamics could improve UI intuitiveness, async call tracking, and network monitoring integration. It also needs better support for emerging technologies. Nagios Core could enhance UI design, configuration ease, and scalability for larger environments. While customizable, Nagios requires advanced setup skills and lacks dynamic interface updates with modern tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk AppDynamics supports hybrid cloud, public cloud, and on-premises deployments with robust customer service. However, it needs faster resolution for complex issues. Nagios Core predominantly supports on-premises environments with stability but lacks customer service, requiring technical expertise for deployment.
Pricing and ROI: Splunk AppDynamics is expensive, with complex licensing, affecting smaller organizations. However, it provides significant ROI through reduced incident resolution times. Nagios Core, being open-source, has no licensing fees, appealing to cost-sensitive users, but may incur indirect costs related to configuration and management efforts.
According to errors, exceptions, and code-level details related to their application performance on a daily basis, the application development team tries to help with Splunk AppDynamics to reduce errors and exceptions, which helps the end users get application availability and feel more confident.
To understand the magnitude of it, when the company asked to replace Splunk AppDynamics with another tool, I indicated that for the proposed tool, we would need five people to do the analysis that Splunk AppDynamics enables me to do.
It's very hard to find ROI because we are currently focused only on the on-premises applications.
AppDynamics is much more helpful.
We got a contact, an account manager, to work directly with for technical support.
They help us resolve any issues raised by our team relating to operations, application instrumentation, or any other issues.
The solution is scalable.
We have reached maximum capacity in our tier, and extending capacity has not been cost-effective from Splunk's perspective.
I would rate the scalability of Splunk AppDynamics as a nine out of ten.
I did not find any Docker solution available with it, and a separate instance has to be installed.
I tried many other solutions at work, however, in terms of Nagios, I haven't seen any disruption or downtime.
It is necessary to conduct appropriate testing before deploying them in production to prevent potential outages.
There are no issues or bugs with the 20.4 version; it is very stable with no functionality or operational issues.
I can rate it nine out of ten.
Splunk AppDynamics does not support the complete MELT framework, which includes metrics, events, logging, and tracing for the entire stack.
If AppDynamics could develop a means to monitor without an agent, it could significantly improve application performance and reduce potential problems.
A good integration with Splunk would be very interesting, as Splunk is a good product for logs, and that part is currently missing in Splunk AppDynamics.
Customers have to pay a premium price, however, they receive considerable value from the product.
All these solutions at the moment are cheap, but it is like paying for insurance; you pay insurance to avoid major damage.
We find its pricing reasonable and competitive.
You can monitor anything.
We have multiple tools, but end users prefer to use Splunk AppDynamics because their portal navigation is very simple and clear.
The feature that I appreciate in AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is the intuitive and user-friendly dynamic mapping it creates for workflows.
What I like the most about Splunk AppDynamics is the end-to-end observability for the application, along with traces.
This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.
Splunk AppDynamics enhances application performance monitoring with advanced diagnostics and real-time insights, offering seamless end-to-end transaction tracking and infrastructure visibility.
AppDynamics provides critical tools for businesses to analyze application behavior and performance. Through innovative features like transaction snapshot analysis and adaptable dashboards, users can quickly identify and address issues, ensuring high levels of system uptime and efficiency. It is designed to support complex environments including Kubernetes and AWS, enhancing user experience by detecting performance issues early. Despite needing improvements in network monitoring and integration, it remains a robust option for tracking application health.
What are the key features of AppDynamics?In industries like financial services and e-commerce, AppDynamics facilitates performance tracking across distributed systems, optimizing infrastructure to meet consumer demands. It excels in environments needing precise transaction monitoring and is pivotal in delivering high value and satisfaction.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.