We performed a comparison between Mirantis Container Cloud and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Mirantis Container Cloud operates similarly to how we interact with databases. It provides a comprehensive platform for deploying and managing containerized applications across cloud environments."
"This solution has cut down on our development time and allows us to spin off new instances for inner development, testing, productions, and security testing."
"The solution containerizes software."
"The UI is very useful."
"I think the volume binding is a really interesting feature."
"The most valuable aspect is the excellent support. In addition, the billing system is really easy to understand."
"The product's most valuable feature is cloud simulation to predict application behavior on the cloud."
"I use Docker in combination with Kubernetes. Management of software packages is easy. It also can be done fast. Rolling out new software updates is smoother and faster due to Mirantis Container Cloud."
"Qualys VM is very stable."
"It's stable and quite reliable."
"Qualys VM has allowed us to know the vulnerabilities we need to prioritize based on the threat levels and the possible impact if there's an intrusion."
"I am impressed with the VMDR feature."
"It is a simple solution that makes scanning easy. You just give it a scheduled task, and it will do everything for you."
"Vulnerability management is the most valuable one and it’s a must in every organization."
"It is very easy to use and there are lots of options. We can usually easily go through it and all of the things we want to configure, and we can configure everything to our specifications very easily."
"The most valuable features of Qualys VM are its ability to do proper vulnerability assessment. It has a lot of updates for all the vulnerability databases from all over the globe. It's an amazing solution when it comes to the versatility of the features it has. Additionally, the reports are very good. It generates very detailed reports about the vulnerabilities inside the environment"
"The solution's stability could be improved."
"I think this solution needs better security due to more risks from the outside world."
"In my previous years, I have brainstormed about the development of Container software. I have recently shifted focus, but the knowledge gained from those were really helpful. In my experience, Containers have their own complexities and to implement them, open source information is crucial. A software with new features would be beneficial. I suggest to implement a flow-based approach for container sequences, similar to Google Cloud's machine learning. The current process of deploying containers involves too many steps, and a more streamlined method would be appreciated. I've even automated deployment using APIs. Overall, simplifying container management and deployment processes would be valuable."
"The solution would benefit in improvements made to the storage, cleaning up information from the disk, and reading logs."
"I find Docker easier to use, but I gave it to an inexperienced developer and it took him a lot of time to understand."
"Sometimes the basic support is a bit difficult if you have a firewall and cloud servers behind the firewall and then try to implement the backup solution, it is a bit difficult to do by yourself."
"With the Mirantis runtime being removed from Kubernetes, which is the industry-wide standard for orchestration of containers, I think it's going in a direction that is not super scalable."
"I feel that the product lacks to offer a proper health status of the images which are running, making it an area where improvements are required."
"Qualys does have an on-prem solution, but it is very expensive."
"What we have found is that the solution is not closely tied with the patch management. It is okay with newer ones, like Windows 10 machines; it gives the correct patch. But for Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008, it does not give us the correct patch so we have to manually identify the patches. This is a major problem."
"I would like to see this solution more developed and competitive in the Cloud space."
"The tool needs to improve the adding assets and report generation features. I would like to see the policy scan of offline appliances in the product's future releases."
"I would like to have CSPM, a continuous scan-like cloud added to the solution."
"Qualys VM could improve by having more skilled support personnel."
"Qualys VM's vulnerability scan could be improved, especially the number of CVE numbers it can manage at a time."
"It is more expensive vs. other products on the market."
Mirantis Container Cloud is ranked 14th in Container Security with 29 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 11th in Container Security with 77 reviews. Mirantis Container Cloud is rated 8.8, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Mirantis Container Cloud writes "An easy-to-manage solution that helps to manage web pages ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". Mirantis Container Cloud is most compared with SUSE Rancher and Snyk, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management. See our Mirantis Container Cloud vs. Qualys VMDR report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
