We performed a comparison between Microsoft Windows Server Update Services and Scalefusion based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Patch Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The noteworthy aspect is the system's capability to handle an extensive range of services and workloads, with the potential for almost unlimited scalability."
"The most important aspect is that we can centrally deploy the updates that are necessary for the organization. It's important."
"Provides the ability to create multiple downstream servers."
"Compared to Linux, Windows Server’s setup is easier."
"The performance has been okay."
"The solution has great potential and leaves the user with almost limitless possibilities. It is truly a product with a million uses."
"We can easily download particular patches, and we can apply them on a group basis and policy basis."
"I am absolutely happy with its stability and performance. It is a stable product."
"Scalefusion is easy to use, and they have a broad knowledge base, so you can quickly find answers if you're unsure how to do something. The articles on the knowledge base are well-written, with clear steps on what to do for a specific scenario. That part is well documented."
"The main problem with WSUS is that the management console doesn't allow you to do a lot of operations. It's actually quite a primitive console, and has been since day one. In order to be more effective, you need to use another tool from Microsoft that can take advantage of WSUS and also offer you the extra features you need."
"Because you have to pay for the product and there may be other good free solutions, this may not be the best choice for a cost-minded organization."
"I would like to see support for other operating systems such as Linux."
"Could be improved with additional features such as an update alarm."
"We have some problems when we update the servers."
"Microsoft Windows Server Update Services could improve the ease of use."
"The only complex part was the solution’s tricky setup phase."
"Job management and control is an area that is in need of improvement."
"It could be easier to put devices on the blocklist. I would like the ability to block a device with a click of a button. Currently, we have to sift through different groups to block a device. It would be nice if Scalefusion allowed me to block without moving the device to a different profile. Another helpful feature they could add is the ability to migrate from one MDM to another. I'd also appreciate more extensive cloud storage. They give you 1 GB by default, but sometimes that's not enough."
More Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is ranked 3rd in Patch Management with 38 reviews while Scalefusion is ranked 19th in Patch Management with 2 reviews. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is rated 8.0, while Scalefusion is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Windows Server Update Services writes "Lets us manage all our organization's updates from a single management console". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Scalefusion writes "An MDM solution for controlling and restricting data on devices". Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is most compared with BigFix, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Quest KACE Systems Management, Microsoft Configuration Manager and Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, whereas Scalefusion is most compared with SOTI MobiControl, VMware Workspace ONE, JumpCloud and Microsoft Intune. See our Microsoft Windows Server Update Services vs. Scalefusion report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
