OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway compete in the VPN services category. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway may have an upper hand due to its performance and advanced encryption features within the Azure ecosystem.
Features: OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise offers extensive compatibility with various operating systems, simplicity in setup on Linux, and robust community support. Its open-source flexibility and scalability allow for customization and encryption. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway focuses on performance and managed VPN capabilities, offering strong security with advanced encryption. Azure supports multiple encryption protocols, enhancing its cloud-based VPN solution.
Room for Improvement: OpenVPN Access Server could improve by simplifying its user interface and enhancing Active Directory integration. Its complex configuration process and frequent updates also need refinement. Azure VPN Gateway could benefit from pricing improvements, easier deployment complexity, and better connectivity reliability. Simplified configurations and enhanced monitoring tools are user suggestions.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenVPN Access Server benefits from detailed documentation and community support, aiding on-premises deployments. Azure VPN Gateway, however, is favored for public cloud environments with available cloud resources. Both receive positive customer service feedback, with OpenVPN benefiting from its open-source community and Azure relying on Microsoft's resources for support.
Pricing and ROI: OpenVPN Access Server is cost-effective, being open-source, and suits small businesses despite extra costs for premium support. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway uses a subscription-based model, which may be costly for some, but is justified by its robust cloud integration. Both solutions offer strong ROI, with OpenVPN favored for cost-conscious projects and Azure for advanced cloud features.
The solution provides significant cost savings, transitioning expenses from CapEx to OpEx.
In a recent incident, I had an issue with the SharePoint API. It relates to documentation, specifically the lack of up-to-date documentation because Microsoft is moving away from the traditional SharePoint REST API to Microsoft Graph.
Prioritization of tasks can also be challenging, impacting the timely resolution of problems.
It was very good, and I would rate it an eight.
I have not dealt with support or customer service, however, the documentation is good, and I would rate it a seven out of ten.
The process was very efficient to scale the solution, which supports a high level of scalability.
It's not very easy to expand, and it would be beneficial if the process were simpler.
I would give OpenVPN a six out of ten for scalability, as it's usually a single user or single device.
Azure VPN Gateway is very stable due to reliance on Microsoft's own network.
The instructions on how to integrate P2N and P2S type networks into Azure VPN Gateway could be improved, though it is a constantly evolving process.
It doesn't matter if it's Windows, Apple, Mac, or Linux - they're all very easy.
OpenVPN could improve in centralized management.
The price of Azure VPN Gateway should be rated five from a purely invoice aspect.
The pricing is somewhat high but acceptable, considering it replaces the need for physical network equipment, leading to cost savings.
My experience with pricing is excellent as the pricing is free.
It's cost-effective by eliminating the need for firewall and networking equipment purchases.
The primary function of Azure VPN Gateway allows for designing subnets from existing networks, whether they are physical or virtual networks within Azure or other cloud instances.
The most valuable features of OpenVPN are its ease of use, client familiarity, end-user familiarity, operating system integration, and price points.
What I appreciate the most about OpenVPN Access Server is that it's very easy to set up.
A VPN gateway is a specific type of virtual network gateway that is used to send encrypted traffic between an Azure virtual network and an on-premises location over the public Internet. You can also use a VPN gateway to send encrypted traffic between Azure virtual networks over the Microsoft network. Each virtual network can have only one VPN gateway. However, you can create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway. When you create multiple connections to the same VPN gateway, all VPN tunnels share the available gateway bandwidth.
OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise provides secure, scalable remote access with strong encryption and cross-platform compatibility, leveraging open-source flexibility for cost-effectiveness. It's ideal for connecting remote workers, maintaining privacy, and securing network communications.
OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise is renowned for its ease of setup and adaptability, supporting Linux and different operating systems, which ensures robust security and seamless integration across network scenarios. With features like two-factor authentication and customizable installers, it emphasizes privacy and remote connectivity. While it offers robust documentation and community support, there are challenges with user management due to the lack of a simple GUI. Users note stability issues under heavy traffic, and improvements in security features and configuration automation are desired. Despite these areas for enhancement, it remains a reliable choice for secure remote access.
What are the key features?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise secures sensitive data while enabling remote access across LANs and VPCs. It's utilized for encrypted traffic protection, facilitating site-to-site VPNs, and connecting mobile workers securely, thus maintaining data integrity in interoffice communications and IoT platforms.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
