Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage comparison

Microsoft Azure Object Storage and Microsoft Azure File Storage are both cloud storage solutions. Based on user reviews, Microsoft Azure Object Storage has the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and scalability, while Microsoft Azure File Storage is noted for ease of integration and usage.

Features: Microsoft Azure Object Storage is appreciated for its extensive scalability, high availability, and integration with various data analytics tools. Users note its ability to handle large amounts of unstructured data efficiently. Microsoft Azure File Storage stands out for its seamless integration with on-premises environments and a familiar file system interface, which users find very intuitive.

Room for Improvement: Users of Microsoft Azure Object Storage suggest enhancements in security features, more granular access controls, and better support for certain file types. Microsoft Azure File Storage users highlight the need for an improved pricing model, better data migration tools, and enhancements in the speed of customer support responses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure Object Storage is praised for its straightforward deployment process and comprehensive customer support, with users appreciating the clear documentation and responsive support team. Microsoft Azure File Storage also receives high marks for deployment ease, largely due to its compatibility with existing file systems and networks, though some users report slower customer support response times.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure Object Storage users find the pricing reasonable, valuing its pay-as-you-go model for flexibility and cost-efficiency, and noting high ROI due to low storage costs and scalability. Microsoft Azure File Storage is noted to be more costly, but users report good ROI, citing the convenience and integration capabilities as justification for the higher price.