Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure App Service vs Unqork comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.9
Microsoft Azure App Service is efficient and cost-effective, reducing resource needs and simplifying implementation with machine learning features.
Sentiment score
8.3
Unqork offers cost-effective, user-friendly solutions for efficient project management and development, enhancing ROI through optimized resources and performance.
The platform provides default workspaces, and managing or increasing space is easier compared to other platforms.
Using Unqork has resulted in improved cost-saving, time-saving, and resource-saving benefits for our projects.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Feedback on Microsoft Azure App Service support varies, with praise for premium help but complaints about regional response inconsistencies.
Sentiment score
7.4
Unqork provides efficient tech support with quick responses, though some users note inconsistent quality in issue prioritization.
Regions like Europe, the US, Canada, and India provide very good and immediate support.
Microsoft provides support for a lot of add-on or customized integration requests.
The Unqork community helped integrate features like colored status indicators using JavaScript.
Technical support from Zendesk is very reliable and effective.
There were instances when support could not solve a problem and suggested raising it to higher management.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Microsoft Azure App Service provides scalable solutions with accessible tiered pricing, requiring some configuration for optimal performance and expandability.
Sentiment score
7.1
Unqork effectively handles large data with MongoDB, but scalability and performance may vary based on configuration and specific conditions.
Scalability features like UI and APIs are all available within the same platform, making it easy to handle increased demands.
Not every project can be executed through Unqork as some complex requirements might need proof of concept before proceeding.
Unqork consistently works in the background, releasing new components, and provides comprehensive documentation.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Microsoft Azure App Service is praised for stability and strong performance, with minor network or configuration issues occasionally reported.
Sentiment score
6.3
Unqork is generally stable with occasional issues, but users rate its stability highly despite minor disruptions and limitations.
I find Microsoft Azure App Service to be quite stable.
A component's previously set value might be missing the next day, affecting reliability.
The main issue I have with Unqork is the limited availability of learning resources.
There have been no significant stability issues where the entire platform went down.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Azure App Service requires enhanced templates, integration, cost clarity, UI, logging, monitoring, AI functions, and multi-language support.
Unqork requires accessibility, platform support, analytics, performance improvements, UI flexibility, mobile support, and enhanced data handling and migration tools.
Deploying Logic Apps in a private network environment becomes complicated due to the extensive white testing and configurations needed at the networking layer.
Microsoft's support and technical aspects like installation complexity could use enhancement.
I would like to see enhancements in the AI functions, specifically in the AI co-pilot within Azure.
Unqork moved from the Sanctuary to Vega platform without providing a migration tool, necessitating manual updates.
The setup for API calls was initially challenging, especially when dealing with service logs and transforming large JSON codes for validation and PDF generation.
It would be beneficial if they further improved compatibility with both the previous Sencha compiler and the new Vega compiler.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Azure App Service offers scalable, competitive pricing with both free and paid plans, suitable for various business needs.
Enterprise users view Unqork's pricing as premium, yet valuable, with customized plans and costly certifications often employer-covered.
Pricing is a concern.
It is an expensive product, primarily due to the licensing fees.
If I compare this solution to AWS, it's cheaper, so it's better.
The certification costs are particularly high, around 16,000 Indian Rupees.
The certification costs around $2000, which is ten times the price of UiPath.
In my experience, it seemed somewhat underpriced, possibly due to being an early adopter.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Azure App Service enhances global web operations with scalability, ease of deployment, integration, and serverless architecture for diverse needs.
Unqork excels with its enterprise integrations, AI, user-friendly design, scalability, security, API, and collaboration tools for efficient operations.
The integration capabilities of Microsoft Azure App Service have greatly enhanced my ability to handle global web operations and support various functions, which were previously challenging without such integration.
The product is easy to maintain and deploy.
The most valuable features in the context of development and deployment are the integration with SDKs and the infrastructure standpoint.
It streamlines operations by automating the process across various departments, allowing cash requests to be raised, reviewed, and approved more efficiently.
Performance-wise, Unqork facilitates connecting and configuring systems synchronously and efficiently.
Unqork allows me to write HTML code, use JavaScript, Angular, and React, which significantly enhances its flexibility.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure App Service
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (4th)
Unqork
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
17th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure App Service is 3.2%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Unqork is 2.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

Sharjeel Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Lets you manage security more efficiently, and supports multiple frameworks, but has limited multi-language support and integration
Limited integration is an area for improvement in Microsoft Azure App Service. Another area for improvement in the platform is multi-language support. That still needs to be added because, at the moment, my team still has to work on specific Python languages whenever the API calls need to be configured. The pricing tier for Microsoft Azure App Service also has room for improvement because it significantly varies. For example, you have premium and dynamic pricing, and people on P2 should be offered dynamic pricing or the high-priced tier on offer could still be worked on. I want a lifecycle pipeline feature, similar to Azure Pipelines from Microsoft Azure App Service. For example, when configuring the pipelines, I should be able to configure the cloud security posture for a specific deployment. By default, there should be a prebuilt cloud security option that can be configured before moving into the production environment. Microsoft Azure App Service should also give you a clue regarding the risks. It would be best if you didn't have to connect to other modules because that wouldn't be as beneficial to platform users, mainly because Microsoft Azure App Service has a lot of security development kits.
Rajeev Lochan - PeerSpot reviewer
Great UI and out-of-the-box integrations, but needs expanded cloud platform support
Given the rapid pace of innovation we’ve already seen from Unqork, there are a few major capability gaps we face currently. However, some areas of improvement and features we would benefit from in upcoming releases include: 1. Enhanced accessibility compliance - While meeting baseline standards, further WCAG conformance and widgets optimized for screen readers could expand access for disabled users of Unqork solutions. Added compliance certifications would also be welcomed. 2. Expanded cloud platform support - The addition of Azure and Google Cloud alongside AWS would allow our deployment options to better align with enterprise strategic cloud choices outside just Amazon. 3. More analytics and observability - Increased telemetry on app performance, component reuse rates, load testing etc. would help fine-tune Unqork solutions. More data and dashboard visibility into adoption would optimize our ROI. 4. Managing technical debt - As portfolios of Unqork apps grow over time, best practices and features to facilitate updating legacy components, refactoring old solutions, and preventing erosion will be helpful. Added controls to manage technical debt long-term. 5. Evolution of existing components - Existing rich widgets and connectors rounding out maturity with incremental capabilities would expand Unqork's versatility. Expanding the range of use cases served by current components. 6. Offline functionality - For mobile solutions, some limited persistent caching and offline usability during intermittent connectivity would better support field agents/inspectors. Tolerating offline states is key. 7. Design version control - Advancing visual version control capabilities for better design history, branching, merging, and reverting changes to Unqork sites would improve collaboration and prevent overwrite errors by nontechnical users.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
39%
Insurance Company
9%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?
Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in locations that other cloud providers do not cater to. When servers are closer t...
Do you recommend Microsoft Azure App Service?
I highly recommend Microsoft Azure. We have been using it for nearly four years. We mostly use it for creating and maintaining websites, such as content management systems like WordPress sites, whi...
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure App Service?
One valuable feature of Azure App Service for us is its integration with Azure DevOps, which we heavily rely on in our development process.
What do you like most about Unqork?
Unqork UI behaves consistently across devices and seamlessly adapts to various form factors.
What needs improvement with Unqork?
Unqork needs to improve its learning resources because there aren't many available on platforms like YouTube or Google. Furthermore, troubleshooting is an area for improvement as errors should be v...
What is your primary use case for Unqork?
I use Unqork ( /products/unqork-reviews ) as a no-code platform to create various types of websites based on user requirements. For example, I can use it for developing solutions for insurance, ban...
 

Also Known As

Azure App Service, MS Azure App Service
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Real Madrid, Absolut, AccuWeather, Heineken, NBC News, Paramount
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure App Service vs. Unqork and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.