Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

MongoDB Atlas vs metaphactory comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 2, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

metaphactory
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
AWS Marketplace (25th)
MongoDB Atlas
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
Database as a Service (DBaaS) (3rd), Managed NoSQL Databases (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

metaphactory and MongoDB Atlas aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. metaphactory is designed for AWS Marketplace and holds a mindshare of 0.3%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
MongoDB Atlas, on the other hand, focuses on Database as a Service (DBaaS), holds 14.5% mindshare, down 16.7% since last year.
AWS Marketplace
Database as a Service (DBaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Martin Kuenzle - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows domain experts who aren't software developers to create domain models
For improvements, I'd like to see more maturity in the product, especially regarding enterprise vendor lock-in. The whole area isn't mature enough yet. I think it will develop over time. More competitors are coming up now. I'd like to see better integration with specific vendors who specialize in managing data products. We need more standards beyond the W3C standards from the semantic web that have been around for twenty-five years.
Laksiri Bala - PeerSpot reviewer
Room for improvement in data handling leads to enhanced cost-effective data management performance
It would be beneficial if MongoDB Atlas could better support OLTP aspects and data frames, as well as enhance its capabilities for data pipelines and visualization dashboards. Furthermore, supporting the medallion architecture could be a valuable addition, and incorporating improved spatial and vector handling for geographical data could make it more competitive. Enhancing vector processing for AI capabilities would also be critical.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"metaphactory is a central tool for implementing these data products. We're considering it for pharmaceutical modeling and connecting to graph databases. It's the only product our company uses with Graph DB."
"The speed of it is the most valuable feature."
"It enables us to get work done quickly and get to our data."
"The stability and performance are great. The high availability feature is great. Moreover, I am happy with the automated backup and restore functionality."
"The most valuable feature is that it's all web-based. So one can browse collections just from the web. MongoDB Atlas is very accessible, quick to understand, and quick to learn. People who have never used CLI can hop into the web interface and browse the database."
"What I found most valuable in MongoDB Atlas is its Elasticsearch feature. It also has high availability, so it's stable."
"Administering the solution is easy."
"The product is simple to use and enterprise-ready. It is also open-source."
"It can store data as a flat file, similar to a file system."
 

Cons

"For improvements, I'd like to see more maturity in the product, especially regarding enterprise vendor lock-in. The whole area isn't mature enough yet. I think it will develop over time. More competitors are coming up now. I'd like to see better integration with specific vendors who specialize in managing data products. We need more standards beyond the W3C standards from the semantic web that have been around for twenty-five years."
"One improvement that I would like to see is a feature to export changes made in the environment, such as creating a new user."
"We need improved query performance."
"The cost needs improvement. The product is good, but the cost that we paid for it is expensive, so it wasn't that valuable."
"The product's file storage documentation needs improvement."
"The installation was straightforward except for the network hardware because it was a little complicated to make the connection with our VPC on AWS."
"Searching and browsing through the collection must be made easier."
"I am still new with it, but since I mentioned that I'm using this product for only the last six months and my experience with this product is good thus far, on a scale of one to ten, I would give MongoDB Atlas a six."
"The web console isn't very intuitive, especially for large data."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive."
"We pay for a license."
"Comparing the price between the MongoDB and Microsoft SQL Server, we are using the enterprise edition of Microsoft SQL Server, which is more expensive than MongoDB."
"The solution is fairly priced."
"For me, MongoDB is expensive, but I think it is not so expensive for customers."
"I have seen the cost, and it was pretty cheap."
"The price of MongoDB Atlas is highly expensive to use and maintain. They are taking advantage of the users with such a high price."
"For our service, it was around 300 to 600 euros per month, which was acceptable for our customers."
"The solution is expensive overall. It does not require a license but if you want the support then you will need to purchase the license. They use a pay-as-you-go model and you are able to receive some discounts by making longer usage commitments."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with metaphactory?
For improvements, I'd like to see more maturity in the product, especially regarding enterprise vendor lock-in. The whole area isn't mature enough yet. I think it will develop over time. More compe...
What is your primary use case for metaphactory?
We use the solution to monitor vulnerabilities. I use metaphactory to create semantic data as part of our data architecture. We're building data products, lifting data to be used internally for bet...
What do you like most about MongoDB Atlas?
There are many valuable features, but scalability stands out. It can scale across zones. You can define multiple nodes. They have also partnered with AWS, offering great service with multiple featu...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB Atlas?
The price of MongoDB Atlas is reasonable, which is why many organizations, including mine, are opting for it.
What needs improvement with MongoDB Atlas?
There is nothing about MongoDB Atlas I would like to improve or any weak points at this time. I have not thought through what other features I would like to see included in future updates. MongoDB ...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Atlas, MongoDB Atlas (pay-as-you-go)
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Wells Fargo, Forbes, Ulta Beauty, Bosch, Sanoma, Current (a Digital Bank), ASAP Log, SBB, Zebra Technologies, Radial, Kovai, Eni, Accuhit, Cognigy, and Payload.
Find out what your peers are saying about n8n.io, Canonical, Launchnodes and others in AWS Marketplace. Updated: August 2025.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.