LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] vs Microsoft Defender XDR comparison

Exabeam and Microsoft are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. Additionally, 60% of Exabeam users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 26, 2025

Microsoft Defender XDR and LogRhythm UEBA compete in the cybersecurity category. Microsoft Defender XDR takes the upper hand with its comprehensive ecosystem integration, although LogRhythm UEBA excels in user behavior analysis.

Features: Microsoft Defender XDR provides comprehensive threat protection, integrates seamlessly within the Microsoft ecosystem, and offers advanced threat hunting. LogRhythm UEBA is notable for detailed threat detection, user behavior analysis, and server threat hunting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Defender XDR requires better third-party tool integration, more streamlined dashboards, and improved AI and machine learning. LogRhythm UEBA could enhance dashboard design, improve user-friendliness, and expand machine-learning capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender XDR supports various cloud environments, offering seamless updates but experiencing variable technical support. LogRhythm UEBA is easy to deploy on-premises, with reliable 24-hour customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender XDR is pricier but offers cost-effectiveness within the Microsoft stack, despite complex licensing. LogRhythm UEBA, while expensive, remains budget-friendly for small to medium businesses with modular pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,153 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Venda E

Cloud Option Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Behavior analytics has improved insider threat detection and reduces false positives for our team

The best features LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] offers are its behavioral balancing, baselining, risk scoring, and correlation with SIEM events, and what stands out most is risk scoring, which gives clear visibility into which user behaviors are genuinely risky and helps our team to focus on the highest priority threats without drowning in noise. Risk scoring helps us to quickly identify which users' activity needs immediate attention by clearly ranking threats based on impact and likelihood; it changes our day-to-day operations by reducing time spent on low-risk alerts and allowing the team to prioritize investigations and response actions more effectively and consistently. LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] has positively impacted our organization by improving our ability to detect insider threats and compromised accounts earlier, resulting in better security visibility, reduced false positives, and faster investigations and response times, which helped the team operate more effectively with greater confidence. I observed a noticeable reduction in false positive alert volume, which shortened the investigation time per incident, improving the mean time to detect and respond, and helping identify high-risk user activities earlier, which prevented potential security incidents from escalating.

Read full review

reviewer2812758

Infosec at a government with 10,001+ employees

Integrated defenses have unified threat hunting, phishing simulations, and identity investigations

I appreciate Microsoft Defender XDR's MDE, Microsoft Defender tool, which has Attack Simulator. Instead of doing a phishing campaign and getting a separate tool, Microsoft Defender XDR does it all. These features of Microsoft Defender XDR have helped us conduct a phishing campaign quarterly, which has been beneficial. I also appreciate the fact that it has Defender for Office integrated, Defender for Identity, and everything integrated together. I would describe the process of using Microsoft Defender XDR to prioritize incidents in my security operations as quite decent. I appreciate the automatic alerting system where any incidents or alerts we receive come directly to our email. From there, we can open the email, go directly to Microsoft Defender XDR, and start our investigations and remediations. I perceive the integration of security and identity access management in Microsoft Defender XDR as affecting my identity protection strategies very well because it is well integrated with Purview, integrated well with Entra ID, and integrated well with Exchange. I especially appreciate MDO, the Office product. If anything happens and I want to conduct an investigation, it takes me directly to Exchange, where I can also investigate any emails or phishing incidents. Instead of going to different portals, everything can be done from Microsoft Defender XDR. If necessary for further investigation, Microsoft Defender XDR then directs me to that environment. I would assess the integration of AI in guiding security actions within Microsoft Defender XDR as quite positive. Recently, Security Copilot went big, and it is beneficial that I can use that, especially to write KQL. I can do threat hunting features and intelligence all within using Microsoft's Security Copilot. It also has a nice AI feature for threat hunting. I know that all the Defender logs go to Sentinel, and I can pull it up from Microsoft Defender XDR or from Sentinel. The fact that I can actually do all that within Microsoft Defender XDR is a nice feature. In the top module, I can do threat lookups, and I can actually type KQLs in Microsoft Defender XDR and look up incidents. Predictive shielding has had a nice impact on my proactive security measures. It is beneficial that it has, similar to Entra ID, a secure score. For me to improve the product, the secure score helps me out. If I rate it from highest to lowest, I can see what things I can improve. Secure score helps me see what areas I can improve in Microsoft Defender XDR to increase my score and bring it to 80 or more. Knowing Microsoft Defender XDR from using it since 2019, before COVID days, I know that they have improved significantly. It is much more user-friendly and has a very nice vulnerability feature that I find handy and useful. The fact that this feature integrates into Intune is also very decent.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Palo Alto Networks Traps improves our security posture and lowers risk by providing next-gen methods to combat against modern threats on all the major platforms."

"When the pandemic started, Palo Alto came up with many solutions, which helped with the quick shift from on-premises to the cloud."

"Cortex is the best solution for avoiding security breaches, malware attacks, and other kinds of security issues."

"The dashboard is customizable."

"I don't have to do much monitoring with it; I don't have to have anybody manually looking at this, it gives us reports, and it lets us know if something needs to be addressed, and we can easily address it."

"In one single alert, we are getting the network telemetry, endpoint telemetry, email security telemetry, and proxy telemetry all in one single ticket, making it very easy."

"The initial setup isn't too bad."

"Automation and playbooks have helped me significantly, as Cortex Xnor's playbooks predefine the workflow of the automation, such as response processes, alert triggering, and enriching the context, efficiently detecting and blocking malicious attacks with firewalls while eliminating workload and speeding responses for next-generation operations."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The capability of pinpointing specific cyber incidents is a valuable feature for us."

"Overall, this is a really good product and I recommend it."

"I typically use the product for reducing cyber risk, and I can investigate attacks more quickly using machine learning tools."

"LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] has positively impacted our organization by improving our ability to detect insider threats and compromised accounts earlier, resulting in better security visibility, reduced false positives, and faster investigations and response times, which helped the team operate more effectively with greater confidence."

"Licensing is on a yearly basis, and it's not expensive compared to its competitors."

"I definitely think that it's good at finding things automatically, versus trying to define it."

"LogRhythm UEBA’s best feature is the dashboard. It provides several graphs, charts, and event logs."

"It is easy to monitor users and that is how the solution is adding value to our firm."

More LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] pros

"The EDR features are valuable. By getting the EDR features, we have more control over the device. We have information about events in real-time and more protection against zero-day threats and zero-day vulnerabilities. We can monitor every event or action that a device is going through. We can get an idea if it is something malicious or if we have to take any actions."

"We can automate routine tasks and write scripts to carry out difficult tasks, which makes things easier for us."

"The support provides a 24 hrs service which I am completely satisfied with."

"Overall, the solution has decreased our time to detect and respond."

"From an attack chain perspective, Defender XDR handles phishing and spam emails easily, while Defender for Endpoint manages endpoints effectively. We've drastically improved our user experience."

"Among the most valuable features are the alert timeline, the alert story, which is pretty detailed. It gives us complete insight into what exactly happened on the endpoint. It doesn't just say, "Malware detected." It tells us what caused that malware to be detected and how it was detected. It gives us a complete timeline from beginning to end."

"The native capabilities are quite good as it slips in seamlessly as part of our integration and gives a lot of flexibility in terms of configuration and customization as per the business requirements."

"I have found the ability to delete unwanted threats beneficial."

More Microsoft Defender XDR pros

Cons

"A little bit more automation would be nice."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks could improve by adding a sandbox feature to better compete with their competitors which have it."

"Enhancing UI simplicity and playbook flexibility are areas that could benefit from more low-code automation options for smoother integrations."

"Cortex XDR should have a lightweight agent, and the agent size should not be heavy."

"When it comes to core analysis, and security analysis, Cortex needs to provide more information."

"The downsides of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks are that in many incidents, when I enter the causality chain, there are numerous logs."

"This is a very costly product."

"The product's pricing needs improvement. They could provide more discounts. Additionally, the dashboard and control panel could be enhanced."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The product could be user-friendly for someone who doesn’t have any prior experience working with it."

"In general, if something needs to be improved in the algorithm, it would be the dashboards."

"It should have better mitigation with other solutions and be tightly integrated with other solutions. It has to be improved."

"The cloud version is lacking and not up to par."

"The on-premises LogRhythm is not very scalable. When considering packets per second or the MPS needed for additional logs such as web application logs, scalability is usually found in cloud products."

"The product should improve its dashboards. Splunk has neat dashboards. Additionally, we would like to enhance the use cases provided by LogRhythm as its use case library is not as extensive as other tools. Its machine-learning capabilities need to improve when compared to other solutions. It lacks risk quantification in a single, transparent view for individuals such as CSOs."

"What needs improvement in LogRhythm UEBA is the pricing. Here in Asia, for example, in Sri Lanka, pricing is the primary concern, and this is the only area for improvement I see in the product."

"We're now exploring the cloud version but unfortunately we've found that they are lagging in that space."

More LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] cons

"There are a few technical issues with Defender XDR that can be improved. Sometimes, the endpoint devices are not reporting properly to the Defender 365 portal. When you're getting all the information from the Microsoft portal, the devices are sometimes not in sync. We have hundreds of endpoint devices, some needing to be onboarded again."

"There are other SIEM solutions that are easier to use, mainly based on the creation of rules, use cases, and groups."

"We should be able to use the product on devices like Apple, Linux, etc."

"Automated playbooks and automated dashboards would be preferable to the way the data is currently being presented."

"Defender XDR could provide recommendations for threat-hunting queries. Some people do not know how to write an advanced threat query, so we need to spend time training them."

"From a performance standpoint, improvements could be made."

"I'd like to see a wider solution that includes not only desktop devices but also other devices, such as servers, storage cabinets, switching equipment, et cetera."

"The only issue I've had is, when it comes to deployment, the steps I must take around policy setup. That is challenging."

More Microsoft Defender XDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our license will require renewal in August, after which the maintenance will continue as usual."

"If one wishes to work with another team or large number of users at a future point, he must purchase a license for them."

"Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider."

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"The cost depends on your chosen license type, like Pro or other licenses."

"It is cost-effective compared to similar solutions. It fits for the small businesses through to the big businesses."

"Very costly product."

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"As LogRhythm UEBA is pretty expensive, I'd give its pricing a seven out of ten."

"I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten. However, the cloud version is expensive. You need to hire professional services for deployment and migrations, which can be expensive."

"The pricing is nice when compared to other products in the industry."

"It is quite a budget-friendly product."

"Licensing is on a yearly basis. It's not expensive compared to its competitors."

"I find the pricing to be quite competitive, especially considering its inclusion in our E5 subscription, which provides a comprehensive set of functionalities."

"The licensing fee for Microsoft 365 Defender is fair."

"All I can say again is the E5 gives you all the capabilities that it offers. It also gives Office 365 and one terabyte of storage. All in all, the E5 license model makes sense. There are some people who say it's quite costly, but rather than paying different vendors, it makes sense to go all in with Microsoft if you've got that licensing. From that perspective, it's cost-effective, but I can't comment much on that."

"Microsoft 365 Defender offers competitive pricing."

"Defender plan 1 is tenant-wise, and Defender plan 2 is per-user, which makes it more expensive. To have certain features, you would need to purchase the E5 license. For all of the capabilities that the tool provides, the price, though it can be high, is fair."

"The solution is affordable, and we haven't been hit with any hidden costs. The subscription model is straightforward, and it's easy to understand how much additional features cost. If we need to cancel a license or feature, we do that well in advance to avoid being charged for it, but overall, the pricing and licensing are simple and easy."

"I believe the pricing is fair and acceptable. I consider it to be reasonable and satisfactory."

"It has consistently offered highly appealing academic pricing, with distinct rates for higher education and general educational purposes."

More Microsoft Defender XDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	54

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	28
Large Enterprise	41

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm UserXDR?

In general, if something needs to be improved in the algorithm, it would be the dashboards. The dashboards with solut...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LogRhythm UserXDR?

I typically use the product for reducing cyber risk, and I can investigate attacks more quickly using machine learnin...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering LogRhythm UserXDR?

I would not necessarily recommend LogRhythm due to its complexity and lack of modularity. I would always recommend Sp...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft 365 Defender?

My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Microsoft Defender XDR is that we are on an E5 license,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft 365 Defender?

From my perspective, Microsoft Defender XDR can be improved with better visibility in certain areas where I can trigg...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft 365 Defender?

My main use cases for Microsoft Defender XDR are telemetry, advanced hunting, and the ability to perform host isolati...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 13% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Darktrace vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Wazuh vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Aruba IntroSpect vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Veriato User Activity Monitoring (UAM) vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Exabeam vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 3% of the time

More LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 8% of the time

Wazuh vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 4% of the time

Cybereason XDR vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Defender XDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

August 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

August 2026

Download LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender XDR

July 2026

Download Microsoft Defender XDR product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

LogRhythm UserXDR, LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA

Microsoft 365 Defender, Microsoft Threat Protection, MS 365 Defender

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] offers advanced threat detection with an intuitive interface, utilizing correlation, behavior analysis, and machine learning to monitor server threats and privileged accounts effectively.

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] provides comprehensive user behavior analytics and threat hunting capabilities, making use of customizable dashboards, reporting tools, file and registry monitoring. CloudAI adds depth by identifying unknown activities, enhancing network visibility and cyber risk reduction through constant monitoring. Users in Sri Lanka find it valuable for network stability, while other users leverage it for improved user monitoring and quick attack investigation. Despite its strong features, enhancements in integration, pricing in Asia, and documentation could improve its adoption.

What are the key features of LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]?

Intuitive Graphical Interface: Provides a user-friendly experience tailored to cybersecurity needs.
Customizable Dashboards: Offers personalized monitoring views and reporting capabilities.
Effective Reporting Tools: Enhances incident analysis and decision-making with detailed insights.
Machine Learning: Identifies patterns in user behavior, detecting anomalies efficiently.
CloudAI: Detects unknown activities, improving threat identification accuracy.

What benefits can users expect from LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]?

Enhanced Threat Detection: Increases network safety through comprehensive monitoring.
Improved Network Visibility: Facilitates better management of cybersecurity resources.
Quick Attack Investigation: Reduces time to detect and respond to threats.
Cyber Risk Reduction: Employs machine learning to address potential security gaps proactively.

In the financial sector, LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] is implemented to monitor privileged accounts and identify suspicious transactions swiftly. Healthcare organizations use it to safeguard sensitive patient data through behavior analysis. Manufacturing firms apply it to protect intellectual property and ensure compliance with industry regulations. Across these industries, the adaptability and analytics of LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] offer a strategic approach to cybersecurity management.

Exabeam

Microsoft Defender XDR is a comprehensive security solution designed to protect against threats in the Microsoft 365 environment.

It offers robust security measures, comprehensive threat detection capabilities, and an efficient incident response system. With seamless integration with other Microsoft products and a user-friendly interface, it simplifies security management tasks.

Users have found it effective in detecting and preventing various types of attacks, such as phishing attempts, malware infections, and data breaches.

Watch the Microsoft demo video here: Microsoft Defender XDR demo video.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Accenture, Deloitte, ExxonMobil, General Electric, IBM, Johnson & Johnson and many others.

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

July 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SentinelOne, CrowdStrike, TrendAI and others in Extended Detection and Response (XDR). Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.