LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] vs Microsoft Defender XDR comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Exabeam and Microsoft are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. Additionally, 60% of Exabeam users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026

Microsoft Defender XDR and LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] compete in the cybersecurity software category. Defender XDR seems to have the upper hand with its integration capabilities and a broad set of features, while LogRhythm excels in user behavior analysis and dashboard functionalities.

Features: Microsoft Defender XDR offers robust web protection, end-to-end threat analytics, and integration with other Microsoft products that provide real-time threat management and automatic incident response. LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] stands out with its behavioral analysis, risk scoring, and interactive dashboards, offering visibility into user behavior patterns and correlation with SIEM data for comprehensive threat detection.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Defender XDR can improve cross-tenant visibility, enhance third-party integration, and refine its UI navigation. LogRhythm UEBA [EOL], on the other hand, needs enhanced model transparency, improved dashboard usability, and better integration with various data sources to meet diverse business needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Defender XDR, primarily cloud-based, facilitates smooth integration into Microsoft environments but faces challenges with support, largely influenced by licensing tiers. LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] offers greater deployment control as an on-premises solution, but can be slower in providing support for complex issues compared to Defender XDR.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender XDR is perceived as expensive but is often bundled with other Microsoft services, potentially yielding cost efficiencies through integration and tool consolidation. LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] is also considered costly, especially for smaller enterprises, offering flexible subscription options, though it may not achieve the same ROI as Defender XDR due to its narrower feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,338 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Venda E

Cloud Option Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Behavior analytics has improved insider threat detection and reduces false positives for our team

The best features LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] offers are its behavioral balancing, baselining, risk scoring, and correlation with SIEM events, and what stands out most is risk scoring, which gives clear visibility into which user behaviors are genuinely risky and helps our team to focus on the highest priority threats without drowning in noise. Risk scoring helps us to quickly identify which users' activity needs immediate attention by clearly ranking threats based on impact and likelihood; it changes our day-to-day operations by reducing time spent on low-risk alerts and allowing the team to prioritize investigations and response actions more effectively and consistently. LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] has positively impacted our organization by improving our ability to detect insider threats and compromised accounts earlier, resulting in better security visibility, reduced false positives, and faster investigations and response times, which helped the team operate more effectively with greater confidence. I observed a noticeable reduction in false positive alert volume, which shortened the investigation time per incident, improving the mean time to detect and respond, and helping identify high-risk user activities earlier, which prevented potential security incidents from escalating.

Read full review

reviewer2812758

Infosec at a government with 10,001+ employees

Integrated defenses have unified threat hunting, phishing simulations, and identity investigations

I appreciate Microsoft Defender XDR's MDE, Microsoft Defender tool, which has Attack Simulator. Instead of doing a phishing campaign and getting a separate tool, Microsoft Defender XDR does it all. These features of Microsoft Defender XDR have helped us conduct a phishing campaign quarterly, which has been beneficial. I also appreciate the fact that it has Defender for Office integrated, Defender for Identity, and everything integrated together. I would describe the process of using Microsoft Defender XDR to prioritize incidents in my security operations as quite decent. I appreciate the automatic alerting system where any incidents or alerts we receive come directly to our email. From there, we can open the email, go directly to Microsoft Defender XDR, and start our investigations and remediations. I perceive the integration of security and identity access management in Microsoft Defender XDR as affecting my identity protection strategies very well because it is well integrated with Purview, integrated well with Entra ID, and integrated well with Exchange. I especially appreciate MDO, the Office product. If anything happens and I want to conduct an investigation, it takes me directly to Exchange, where I can also investigate any emails or phishing incidents. Instead of going to different portals, everything can be done from Microsoft Defender XDR. If necessary for further investigation, Microsoft Defender XDR then directs me to that environment. I would assess the integration of AI in guiding security actions within Microsoft Defender XDR as quite positive. Recently, Security Copilot went big, and it is beneficial that I can use that, especially to write KQL. I can do threat hunting features and intelligence all within using Microsoft's Security Copilot. It also has a nice AI feature for threat hunting. I know that all the Defender logs go to Sentinel, and I can pull it up from Microsoft Defender XDR or from Sentinel. The fact that I can actually do all that within Microsoft Defender XDR is a nice feature. In the top module, I can do threat lookups, and I can actually type KQLs in Microsoft Defender XDR and look up incidents. Predictive shielding has had a nice impact on my proactive security measures. It is beneficial that it has, similar to Entra ID, a secure score. For me to improve the product, the secure score helps me out. If I rate it from highest to lowest, I can see what things I can improve. Secure score helps me see what areas I can improve in Microsoft Defender XDR to increase my score and bring it to 80 or more. Knowing Microsoft Defender XDR from using it since 2019, before COVID days, I know that they have improved significantly. It is much more user-friendly and has a very nice vulnerability feature that I find handy and useful. The fact that this feature integrates into Intune is also very decent.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability is pretty good except for one or two cases, and based on the performance, it's been okay with pretty high performance, no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze."

"This software helps us understand any issues that may arise when someone is not at work."

"The normal protection was really effective, and we detected situations that if we didn't have Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, it's highly likely that we would have been affected, but it protected the infrastructure."

"It can automatically correlate events and logs, which is very helpful for an IT administrator. It can correlate different kinds of malware activities over a network, agent, or host system. You do not need to do it manually. It is a good feature. It is also a user-friendly solution. We have deployed it on the cloud because our space does not provide any flexibility for on-premises deployment, but Palo Alto has added some flexibility to install it on-premises. It must be like the same Cortex XDR agent for all the VPN services, web filtering services, and everything else."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks's ability to block sophisticated threats in real time is quite good and is on par with SentinelOne's."

"Traps has drastically reduced our endpoint attack surface via advanced detection capabilities, sandboxing of never before seen programs, and by drastically limiting where executables can launch in the first place."

"The initial setup is pretty easy."

"The policy configuration is great, the granularity of policies that are available is very helpful, it is straightforward to set up, and it has pretty much everything we need and works well within the Palo Alto ecosystem."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"I typically use the product for reducing cyber risk, and I can investigate attacks more quickly using machine learning tools."

"It has a lot of features. It has file integration monitoring."

"It is easy to monitor users and that is how the solution is adding value to our firm."

"LogRhythm UEBA’s best feature is the dashboard. It provides several graphs, charts, and event logs."

"Overall, this is a really good product and I recommend it."

"Licensing is on a yearly basis, and it's not expensive compared to its competitors."

"The solution is useful for privilege accounts and super admin accounts. It is beneficial from a security perspective. The tool uses machine learning rather than threshold-based alerts. For instance, it can detect unusual user logins, such as a user logging in from a new browser or location."

"The most valuable features are file activity monitoring and registry activity monitoring."

More LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] pros

"The biggest return on investment when using Microsoft Defender XDR for me is saving time for the most part."

"Microsoft Defender's most critical component is its CASB solution. It has many built-in policies that can improve your organization's cloud security posture. It's effective regardless of where your users are, which is critical because most users are working from home. It's cloud-based, so nothing is on-premise."

"Advanced hunting is good. I like that. We can drill down to lots of details."

"Microsoft 365 Defender's most valuable feature is the ability to control the shadow IP."

"Defender XDR offers richer insights into Defender XDR. It's a better overall experience."

"The most valuable feature is probably the aggregation and correlation of the different telemetry points with Defender for Identity, Defender for Endpoint, and Defender for Cloud Apps. All of these various things are part of that portal. We've wanted that single pane of glass for years."

"What I appreciate most about Microsoft Defender XDR is the visibility it provides through a breakdown of incidents that come through."

"The attack simulation is excellent; initially, this feature wasn't very robust, but Microsoft improved what we could achieve with it. We can now customize our practice phishing emails and include our company logo, for example. Attack simulation also helps integrate with third-party solutions where applicable and provides an overview of our security architecture through testing. The summary includes areas for improvement in our protection and what steps we need to take to get there."

More Microsoft Defender XDR pros

Cons

"If they had pulse rate detection, it would be better."

"The solution could improve by providing better integration with their own products and others."

"It should support more mobile operating systems. That is one of the cons of their infrastructure right now."

"The MAC agent is not as robust feature-wise as the PC version."

"I have run into some detection issues with Cortex XDR. It needs to be better at detection of internal attacks."

"Although I would say this product is highly-rated, it could probably do more because nothing does everything that you want."

"The onboarding process could be better."

"Basically, they don't provide customer support tools just to investigate the logs."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The product could be user-friendly for someone who doesn’t have any prior experience working with it."

"In general, if something needs to be improved in the algorithm, it would be the dashboards."

"The search feature needs to be improved."

"The solution is very expensive. There are also costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"It should have better mitigation with other solutions and be tightly integrated with other solutions. It has to be improved."

"It would be helpful if there were more guidance provided for integrating with unsupported devices."

"The on-premises LogRhythm is not very scalable. When considering packets per second or the MPS needed for additional logs such as web application logs, scalability is usually found in cloud products."

"We're now exploring the cloud version but unfortunately we've found that they are lagging in that space."

More LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] cons

"Generally, antivirus products provide a central control to manage every device in terms of who is installing it or who is trying to disable it, but Microsoft doesn't have such a control center for the antivirus product it provides."

"Every now and then, Microsoft Defender XDR seems to go through and aggregates almost a week's worth of incidents and wraps them up, indicating a huge problem."

"I do think that maybe having a feature within my organization where there are three different domains within which we have to operate would be helpful, as there is currently no unified view within the domains."

"The automation response being slow is the main concern; when an incident occurs or if I run a remediation, it takes significant time to complete the remediation."

"The only problem I find is that the use cases are built-in. There is no template available that you can modify according to your organization's standards. What they give is very generic, the market standard, but that might not be applicable to every organization."

"Automated playbooks and automated dashboards would be preferable to the way the data is currently being presented."

"The only issue I've had is, when it comes to deployment, the steps I must take around policy setup. That is challenging."

"The onboarding and offboarding need improvement. I work with other vendors as well, and they have an option to add a device or remove a device from the portal, whereas with Microsoft 365 Defender, we need to do that manually. However, once you do that, everything can be controlled through the portal, but getting the device onboarded and offboarded is currently manual. If we have an option to simply remove a device from the portal or get a device added from the portal, it would be more convenient. The rest of the features are similar. This is the only area where I found it different from others. I would also like to be able to simply filter with a few of the queries that are already there."

More Microsoft Defender XDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is cost-effective compared to similar solutions. It fits for the small businesses through to the big businesses."

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"The pricing is okay, although direct support can be expensive."

"This is an expensive solution."

"Our customers have expressed that the price is high."

"The cost of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is $55 to $90 USD per endpoint per month."

"It's about $55 per license on a yearly basis."

"It has a yearly renewal."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten. However, the cloud version is expensive. You need to hire professional services for deployment and migrations, which can be expensive."

"It is quite a budget-friendly product."

"Licensing is on a yearly basis. It's not expensive compared to its competitors."

"As LogRhythm UEBA is pretty expensive, I'd give its pricing a seven out of ten."

"The pricing is nice when compared to other products in the industry."

"There are no issues with pricing, but sometimes, the clarity in licensing is a concern."

"It is 15 dollars per server per month. It is worth it, but it can be costly. It depends on the company's size."

"Defender plan 1 is tenant-wise, and Defender plan 2 is per-user, which makes it more expensive. To have certain features, you would need to purchase the E5 license. For all of the capabilities that the tool provides, the price, though it can be high, is fair."

"Microsoft purposely makes its license combinations complex and includes combinations like Microsoft 365 E3 and Microsoft 365 E5, Office 365 E3, Office 365 E5, and Office 365 E1, so you get confused. Microsoft tries to sell you a bundle of a lot of things together."

"Defender XDR is included in the E5 license, but it's a bit too expensive."

"All I can say again is the E5 gives you all the capabilities that it offers. It also gives Office 365 and one terabyte of storage. All in all, the E5 license model makes sense. There are some people who say it's quite costly, but rather than paying different vendors, it makes sense to go all in with Microsoft if you've got that licensing. From that perspective, it's cost-effective, but I can't comment much on that."

"Its licensing and pricing are handled by someone else. My role is limited to incidents or issues with the portal, but you get what you pay for. It is worth the cost."

"On average, we pay around 55 euros per user for the services and features we receive."

More Microsoft Defender XDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,338 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Retailer

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	50
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	57

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	28
Large Enterprise	41

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm UserXDR?

In general, if something needs to be improved in the algorithm, it would be the dashboards. The dashboards with solut...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LogRhythm UserXDR?

I typically use the product for reducing cyber risk, and I can investigate attacks more quickly using machine learnin...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering LogRhythm UserXDR?

I would not necessarily recommend LogRhythm due to its complexity and lack of modularity. I would always recommend Sp...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft 365 Defender?

My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Microsoft Defender XDR is that we are on an E5 license,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft 365 Defender?

From my perspective, Microsoft Defender XDR can be improved with better visibility in certain areas where I can trigg...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft 365 Defender?

My main use cases for Microsoft Defender XDR are telemetry, advanced hunting, and the ability to perform host isolati...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 16% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

IBM Security QRadar vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Security Network IPS vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

Varonis Platform vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

Darktrace vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 7% of the time

Wazuh vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec XDR vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Defender XDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

November 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

October 2026

Download LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender XDR

October 2026

Download Microsoft Defender XDR product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

LogRhythm UserXDR, LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA

Microsoft 365 Defender, Microsoft Threat Protection, MS 365 Defender

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] offers advanced threat detection with an intuitive interface, utilizing correlation, behavior analysis, and machine learning to monitor server threats and privileged accounts effectively.

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] provides comprehensive user behavior analytics and threat hunting capabilities, making use of customizable dashboards, reporting tools, file and registry monitoring. CloudAI adds depth by identifying unknown activities, enhancing network visibility and cyber risk reduction through constant monitoring. Users in Sri Lanka find it valuable for network stability, while other users leverage it for improved user monitoring and quick attack investigation. Despite its strong features, enhancements in integration, pricing in Asia, and documentation could improve its adoption.

What are the key features of LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]?

Intuitive Graphical Interface: Provides a user-friendly experience tailored to cybersecurity needs.
Customizable Dashboards: Offers personalized monitoring views and reporting capabilities.
Effective Reporting Tools: Enhances incident analysis and decision-making with detailed insights.
Machine Learning: Identifies patterns in user behavior, detecting anomalies efficiently.
CloudAI: Detects unknown activities, improving threat identification accuracy.

What benefits can users expect from LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]?

Enhanced Threat Detection: Increases network safety through comprehensive monitoring.
Improved Network Visibility: Facilitates better management of cybersecurity resources.
Quick Attack Investigation: Reduces time to detect and respond to threats.
Cyber Risk Reduction: Employs machine learning to address potential security gaps proactively.

In the financial sector, LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] is implemented to monitor privileged accounts and identify suspicious transactions swiftly. Healthcare organizations use it to safeguard sensitive patient data through behavior analysis. Manufacturing firms apply it to protect intellectual property and ensure compliance with industry regulations. Across these industries, the adaptability and analytics of LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] offer a strategic approach to cybersecurity management.

Exabeam

Microsoft Defender XDR is a comprehensive security solution designed to protect against threats in the Microsoft 365 environment.

It offers robust security measures, comprehensive threat detection capabilities, and an efficient incident response system. With seamless integration with other Microsoft products and a user-friendly interface, it simplifies security management tasks.

Users have found it effective in detecting and preventing various types of attacks, such as phishing attempts, malware infections, and data breaches.

Watch the Microsoft demo video here: Microsoft Defender XDR demo video.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Accenture, Deloitte, ExxonMobil, General Electric, IBM, Johnson & Johnson and many others.

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about SentinelOne, TrendAI, Palo Alto Networks and others in Extended Detection and Response (XDR). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,338 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.