Lightspin vs Skyhawk Security comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Sponsored
Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
5th
Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
4th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
85
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (5th), Cloud and Data Center Security (5th), Container Security (5th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (4th), Compliance Management (5th)
Lightspin
Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
31st
Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
35th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Container Security (38th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (24th)
Skyhawk Security
Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
21st
Ranking in Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
23rd
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

AS
May 9, 2024
Evidence-based reporting shows all the findings and severity, helping us to prioritize issues
We provide cloud services on our site using AWS. Singularity detects flaws that we must close for security reasons. We use Singularity to observe those findings and fix things based on the customer's requirements. Previously, we used to segregate issues and look after them. Singularity helped us secure our infrastructure. We've significantly reduced our potential security breaches to a minimum. It has improved how we operate on a larger scale. We set up the platform, onboarded the info, and then gradually moved further. Over time, it helped us slowly resolve those issues. We were using the cloud platforms' native security tools, but those were unhelpful. Now, we rely on this more than those services. Singularity reduced our false positive rate by about 60 percent. We've had even better results in terms of our risk posture. We can rely on this tool to improve our security conditions on a broader scale. If I gave our security posture a percent rating, I would give it 89 percent. The solution saves time by giving us everything in one place. You don't need to manually check every account. It tells us a lot. Singularity reduces our detection time by about 60 percent. Singularity has improved collaboration among cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams. Previously, it would take around a week for engineers to address issues. Now that we use this tool, we resolve issues in one or two days.
Use Lightspin?
Share your opinion
CF
May 27, 2022
Reasonably priced with quick notifications and a fast setup
The solution needs automatic testing. It's very important for us to be able to create test scenarios to evaluate the resilience of our infrastructure. And will be very useful being able to check different part of our infrastructure like databases, queues, standard instances or the networking part. We cannot afford a red team and we are able to have penetration tests only few times a year, so it could be very useful to have integrated tests in our tools in a convenient way. It also could be useful being able to create comparative reports about these tests in different time periods to investigate how the infrastructure as evolved in resiliency.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I wasn't sure what to expect from the pricing, but I was pleasantly surprised to find that it was a little less than I thought."
"Singularity Cloud Workload Security's pricing is good."
"The tool is cost-effective."
"It was reasonable pricing for me."
"Singularity Cloud Security by SentinelOne is cost-efficient."
"Its pricing is constant. It has been constant over the previous year, so I am happy with it. However, price distribution can be better explained. That is the only area I am worried about. Otherwise, the pricing is very reasonable."
"PingSafe is priced reasonably for our workload."
"PingSafe is less expensive than other options."
Information not available
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
5%
Computer Software Company
38%
Performing Arts
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Healthcare Company
12%
Real Estate/Law Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?
The price depends on the extension of the solution that you want to buy. If you want to buy just EDR, the price is le...
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
All EDRs are made of different modules. There is a firewall module, an IPS module, and an application module. The app...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Radware Cloud Native Protector?
The initial setup process is easy and intuitive.
What is your primary use case for Radware Cloud Native Protector?
We use the product for monitoring and integrating web services.
 

Also Known As

PingSafe
No data available
Radware Cloud Native Protector
 

Learn More

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP). Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.