ThreatLocker and Kaspersky Total Security both compete in the endpoint protection category. ThreatLocker seems to have the upper hand due to its strong application control and quick support response, while Kaspersky is commended for its reliable antivirus capabilities.
Features: ThreatLocker offers robust application control with ring-fencing and selective elevation, making it ideal for detailed app management. It includes comprehensive training through the Cyber Hero program and an intuitive learning mode. Kaspersky Total Security provides signature-based detection and antivirus protection with intrusion prevention systems, efficient virus scanning, and centralized management features.
Room for Improvement: ThreatLocker could benefit from increased flexibility in training and staggered updates to ease network load. Users suggest the introduction of podcasts for ongoing insights, while some find the interface and learning curve challenging. Kaspersky could improve configuration simplicity, boost stability, and enhance authorization speed and resource efficiency.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both platforms support on-premises and cloud deployments. ThreatLocker's deployment is straightforward, backed by effective onboarding and highly-rated customer service, particularly the Cyber Hero support. Kaspersky's deployment is traditional, with simpler installation but less exceptional customer service feedback compared to ThreatLocker.
Pricing and ROI: ThreatLocker is generally seen as well-priced, offering strong ROI with its security features and efficiency improvements. Kaspersky Total Security is traditionally priced with annual licenses, considered competitive but not low-cost. Users recognize ThreatLocker's operational impact and ROI in security terms, while Kaspersky's ROI is noted for antivirus reliability.
Kaspersky Total Security provides a good return on investment by improving data security and reducing costs by sixty percent with its robust security features.
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
The main return on investment is peace of mind, knowing that with ThreatLocker on any endpoint, it will almost always block all malicious code or exploits, even zero-day exploits.
It keeps malware, Trojans, and ransomware at bay.
I rate them an eight out of ten for their support in deploying Total Security.
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Their support is world-class.
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
We have not experienced any issues with Kaspersky Total Security as we manage their entire IT infrastructure.
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
It has been very stable, reliable, and accessible.
The only area for improvement is the price, which is slightly high.
The system can be demanding on resources, making devices busy when running the client application.
Controlling the cloud environment, not just endpoints, is crucial.
This is problematic when immediate attention is needed.
Comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring is a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users.
The pricing for Kaspersky Total Security is quite affordable.
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
I had a really good deal at the time, and it continues to be cost-effective.
The solution offers endpoint protection by scanning and alerting to viruses in the organization without physical inspection, increasing efficiency by stopping unwanted applications running in the background.
Kaspersky Total Security is a lightweight solution that does not slow down Windows.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
It protects our customers.
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform | 1.1% |
| Kaspersky Total Security | 1.3% |
| Other | 97.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
Kaspersky Total Security provides robust antivirus and malware protection, comprehensive security for banking systems, infrastructure, endpoints, and personal devices including antivirus, firewall, and VPN services.
Kaspersky Total Security is a multi-faceted solution featuring antivirus, firewall, VPN services, and protection for personal devices, company laptops, and critical data. It is utilized for patching, managing vulnerabilities, and safeguarding against threats from USB drives and harmful websites. With features like anti-spam for Microsoft Exchange Server and secure web browser modes for online banking, Kaspersky offers comprehensive protection for personal and business use. Additionally, its combination of machine learning, AI, and reliable intrusion prevention makes it a preferred choice for many users.
What are the most important features of Kaspersky Total Security?Kaspersky Total Security is implemented across diverse industries to fortify banking systems, infrastructure, and endpoints. It protects personal devices, company laptops, and sensitive data, ensuring a safe digital environment for users. Industries rely on its anti-spam features for secure communication and its secure browser modes for safe online banking. Kaspersky's superior intrusion prevention and automated threat recognition powered by AI and machine learning enhance industry-specific cybersecurity measures.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform empowers organizations with application control, selective elevation, and ring-fencing to enhance security and prevent unauthorized access.
ThreatLocker provides comprehensive security management using application allowlisting to ensure only approved software operates across servers and workstations. The platform's centralized management simplifies security processes by consolidating multiple tools, and its robust capabilities align with zero-trust strategies by actively blocking unauthorized applications and ensuring compliance. Users note intuitive features such as mobile access, helpful training resources, and responsive support, which effectively reduce operational costs and help desk inquiries. The managed service providers prefer ThreatLocker to maintain network integrity by preventing malicious scripts and unauthorized access attempts. However, users identify room for growth in training and support flexibility, the interface, and certain technical challenges like network saturation from policy updates.
What are the most important features?Organizations utilize ThreatLocker for application allowlisting, ensuring only authorized software operates to prevent unauthorized access efficiently. Deployed across servers and workstations, its features support zero-trust principles and are favored by managed service providers for application management and network integrity.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
