No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Juniper AppFormix vs Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Juniper AppFormix
Ranking in Cloud Management
47th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)
Ranking in Cloud Management
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (6th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Juniper AppFormix is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is 1.3%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)1.3%
Juniper AppFormix1.0%
Other97.7%
Cloud Management
 

Featured Reviews

Ankur Chauhan - PeerSpot reviewer
Founder and CEO at OogyNW Consultancy
Good scalability, useful in terms of collective analytics, and low latency
For a hybrid cloud area, I see some issues when on the hybrid cloud; you want to use this kind of solution. It doesn't work great everywhere. If it's a complete solution from them, then it's very great. But when it's a hybrid cloud I'm trying to make, then I find some issues here. Moreover, my expectations were probably slightly more for the third-party tool integration; for example, regarding the analytics, I had some different tools. So, integration was not as good as I was expecting. So, analytics, configuration tool I was not really happy. So, there is room for improvement in context with integration with existing tools in our network environment.
VK
Global Infrastructure& Cloud Operations at a wholesaler/distributor with 10,001+ employees
Cloud migration becomes seamless with hardware management handled externally
The features I appreciate most about Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) are that we don't need to manage the hardware to start up with, and it is being managed by Microsoft currently, so that is hands-off. On our other solution, we have to take ownership of some hard drive failures and need to open up a case with Dell since we have Dell hardware. With Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2), I don't need to; it's been fully supported by Microsoft, and it's just a support ticket for them to take care of the failover and all those things. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) are managed by Microsoft. The hardware and the VMs are no longer constrained or bullying VMs since we are especially focused on the two days and over the workload. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) have helped migrate our apps and data to the public Cloud; however, we haven't migrated databases yet. The first step is apps to migrate, and that is working seamlessly fine because the application team doesn't know whether it's hosted on-prem or in Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) in Azure. I have been able to migrate enterprise applications with Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2). The time it took to migrate versus having to do application refactoring is easier because it is a lift and shift. My impression of Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) availability in AWS and Microsoft Azure marketplaces is that AWS is good and long overdue. The only drawback is that there aren't many hardware selections, as they have only a very limited selection compared to AWS. The license portability of Nutanix is very good; if you purchase a license, it doesn't matter whether you are going to use it in Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2), on-prem, or anything else. Not many hypervisors provide this currently, making it a really strong selling point for Nutanix.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Juniper is a high cost but it's a good enterprise solution for my enterprise network."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"It's a stable product. I didn't find any issues with regard to stability. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"Its performance and speed are valuable. Its performance has helped me reduce costs."
"The scalability is good."
"The feature I probably appreciate the most about Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is its scalability—how quickly I can deploy more nodes on a cluster and remove nodes."
"Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) benefits my company as it reduces administration work, allowing me to spend more time away from hardware issues."
"The license portability is good enough."
"Being able to spin up or reduce the cluster size based on the needs that we have has been helpful for us."
"On a scale of one to ten, I rate Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) a ten."
"Having a single pane of glass where you can have both your on-prem and anything else that you spin up within AWS is useful."
 

Cons

"My expectations were probably slightly more for the third-party tool integration; for example, regarding the analytics, I had some different tools. So, integration was not as good as I was expecting. So, analytics, configuration tool I was not really happy. So, there is room for improvement in context with integration with existing tools in our network environment."
"This solution has a yearly licensing. In my country, it's really expensive."
"This solution has a yearly licensing. In my country, it's really expensive."
"Improvement is obviously needed in pricing; I cannot pinpoint where else I would suggest improvements."
"I don't have the expertise to build a hybrid cloud. We are starting to build one and haven't tried that part yet. I want to try because that is the most critical part for us. I want to see what, if anything, could be improved. The product is fantastic locally. Now, I want to try it in the cloud. My problem is not in the infrastructure; it is in the application, a different thing."
"The technical support for Nutanix Clusters could be better."
"There are still some things that could be improved about the product."
"I believe that networking is one of the biggest improvements. They have a great stock already, but some use cases, particularly around incrementally spinning up workloads, haven't been considered closely enough. As we're putting workloads on there by adding a few VMs at a time, there are networking aspects that need to be considered more closely. It's great once everything's there, but incrementally getting things there is what's difficult."
"Perhaps the one thing that could be improved is the documentation around the solution."
"Some of the interfaces aren't as intuitive as they should be."
"The most significant improvement would be to streamline the starting point so that we could kick off the deployment with one node and then scan out that deployment without a need to restructure or reformat anything."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I'm not familiar with the contracts, but I thought the process was pretty seamless. Licensing for the Nutanix part was the same as licensing something on-prem, and since it runs on bare metal EC2, there was no new process we had to go through—it fits into our existing procurement processes nicely. I appreciate Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)'s license portability."
"The solution's licensing can be very pricey."
"There are positives and negatives to licensing. It all makes sense now, but it took a while. When the licenses first changed, it was a bit confusing."
"I feel that the prices could be improved, but the truth is that I am very happy. The license price keeps increasing, but I am confident that it is much more reasonable than other brands."
"The licensing portability can be very interesting. At the moment, I am working with Nutanix Appliances with the AHV as a hypervisor. I did not have a chance to ask for portability between platforms, but it will be good if you can have portability between multiple types of platforms."
"The licensing model of Nutanix is complex."
"The solution has been more costly at this point. We do not see any cost savings."
"I am working on one configuration that is priced at $50,000 USD, whereas another one that I'm working on is estimated to cost $250,000 USD."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
896,034 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)?
I'm not familiar with the contracts, but I thought the process was pretty seamless. Licensing for the Nutanix part was the same as licensing something on-prem, and since it runs on bare metal EC2, ...
What needs improvement with Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)?
From an improvement perspective, I cannot see anything at this point because I used those Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) at that moment, but I am currently not using it. The pricing could be lower.
What is your primary use case for Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2)?
I use the workload migration feature between clouds, such as migrating from VMware to Nutanix. I use Nutanix Move to migrate workloads from Nutanix Move. However, in some cases with our failover cl...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Nutanix Clusters
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rackspace, PlusServer
The Home Depot, JetBlue, Hyundai, ShiftLeft
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper AppFormix vs. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
896,034 professionals have used our research since 2012.