Jitterbit Vinyl vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service comparison

Jitterbit and Oracle are both solutions in the Rapid Application Development Software category. Jitterbit is ranked #28, while Oracle is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5. Jitterbit holds a 0.5% mindshare in RADS, compared to Oracle’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Jitterbit users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Jitterbit Vinyl

Read 31 Jitterbit Vinyl reviews

1,087 Views
935 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Read 6 Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service reviews

1,182 Views
827 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Jitterbit Vinyl

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Jitterbit Vinyl and Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service are competing products, each offering unique advantages in their categories. Jitterbit Vinyl receives favorable feedback regarding pricing and support, while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service impresses users with its robust features, making it a preferred choice despite higher costs.

Features: Jitterbit Vinyl users value its flexibility, integration capabilities, and ease of use. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is praised for its comprehensive development tools, strong performance, and extensive feature set, giving it an edge in this category.

Room for Improvement: Jitterbit Vinyl users suggest enhancements in documentation, UI responsiveness, and integration features. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service users desire better integration capabilities, more intuitive controls, and improvements in user interface design. Both products have areas for growth, reflecting their different strengths.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jitterbit Vinyl is commended for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service also receives good reviews for deployment, but some users report a steeper learning curve. Both have effective customer service, but Jitterbit Vinyl's easier deployment gives it a slight advantage.

Pricing and ROI: Jitterbit Vinyl is seen as cost-effective with a noticeable ROI, making it appealing for budget-conscious buyers. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service, while more expensive, delivers a substantial ROI due to its extensive features. Users feel the additional cost is justified by the benefits, although it may not suit all budgets.

To learn more, read our detailed Jitterbit Vinyl vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Vinyl vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jitterbit Vinyl

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

28th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

25th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No-Code Development Platforms (16th)

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud...

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

19th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Jitterbit Vinyl is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is 1.0%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

Larry Egan

VP Strategic Technologies at Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc

Can connect to any data source so we don't need to replicate data into a data warehouse to do reporting analytics

Having been a customer of theirs for a long time, I think the UI needed improvements early on. But, they have done a remarkable job catching up in that regard. They have always been great at connecting to a variety of data sources. They are a leader in that space. They do a great job, from a business analyst perspective, helping you shape what the ultimate system is going to look like. There really aren't a lot of areas that need improvement. The areas that they have, they are keenly aware of and have made great strides in recent releases.

Read full review

Sherif Bashar

Head of Digital Solutions at Wind Integrated Solutions

Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day

There are very minor things, like the feature called "action chains," that could use a bit of enhancement. But the team is perfect; they're working on it. An action chain is a sequence of actions triggered by a button or an event. It executes code in order, from top to bottom. For example, it could call a code, call a REST service, and then insert data into a database. It needs enhancement because it can be a bit complex for fresh grads or new developers to understand. It would be better if it was made more readable. That's the main point. But if you have experience, you'll understand it easily. One more thing I want to add about Visual Builder: up until two years ago, it supported native mobile development. That's not available anymore. They replaced native mobile development with progressive web apps, and most customers are complaining about that. We need native mobile development back – the ability to put apps on stores like Google Play or the App Store. That feature is not available right now, and they deprecated it starting in 2024. It's very important. Otherwise, clients go with Flutter or other mobile development tools. It would be good for Oracle to regain that capability. We need the native mobile development feature back.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"VINYL has given us the ability to really improve the speed with which we deploy releases and respond to the good ideas that our people have."

"We find it is easy to learn and use, and the user interface is easy to pick up. We have trained some of our own people to be able to do apps with VINYL. Therefore, we can turn things around quickly."

"The Lite Integration is really the key thing. You're able to attach the Vinyl software to a variety of different systems very easily and pull data together in a way that is really difficult to do using traditional technology... Also, the fact that it's a no-code platform also makes it easier for people to understand and deal with internally, to continue to build applications and modify existing applications."

"Their integrations are terrific. We've had zero issues, a 100 percent success rate with integrations. In terms of Zudy's data source connectors and API integrations, we've been really pleased. We use some software that is very common in the media business, and then we also have some custom things that we built for a variety of different use cases within our company, and we've had zero integration issues, in terms of getting data into Zudy and getting data out of it. It's been great."

"Vinyl has been a game changer in how we can now quickly deploy key features and new products."

"Valuable features include the ability to connect to disparate data sources, the workflow engine, and the speed and agility in building apps."

"One of the most valuable features of the solution is how rapid we can implement it, going from a design to an operational concept in a very short period of time."

"It allows us higher visibility into our data, which allows us to data-check faster, and validate data that we had not been able to validate, prior."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pros

"The tool is very easy to use."

"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."

"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."

"The action chains are really helpful, and the trigger event, along with those action chains, has been very helpful."

"The initial setup is easy."

"VBS is another tool that allows users to create enterprise applications without needing to store their projects in traditional databases like SQL."

Cons

"Upload time of documents that needed to be uploaded was a request that we were having an issue with. That issue got resolved in [near] real time, within probably 30 minutes."

"I don't have a lot of negative things to say about the platform. One of the things we joke about, because it is very minor in detail, is that as with any platform, when you're hosting a live webinar on a GoToMeeting or a Zoom, everything slows down a little bit. So when you're doing a live demo internally with folks, the platform can go a step slower. That's not necessarily just a Zudy thing."

"If it could be prettier, it might be a bit more attractive on the business side. The most meaningful improvement might be done in some of the aesthetics of the reporting and dashboarding."

"The calendar has room for improvement, but that's what they're going to be working on next, to make a Gantt chart."

"One of the troubles we have sometimes is the amount of data we're processing within the applications. That can really add a lot of "laggy-ness." That's an ongoing struggle we're going to have while we use it. It doesn't happen for all our applications, only some of them that are heavy on the reporting."

"I would like them to build out more tools for communication, particularly the ability to do a multinode panel via email."

"Perhaps the UI could be improved."

"Eventually, a nicer way to create certain features, like the way that we create PDFs, would help. Sometimes the way that it resizes when I have multiple windows up, could also be better. It's minor stuff though. It's edge-case stuff."

More Jitterbit Vinyl cons

"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."

"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."

"The initial setup of Oracle VBCS can be challenging for those unfamiliar with DBS."

"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."

"The tool has minor bugs."

"There are some bugs in VBCS."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to if I used traditional methods, such as hiring developers and setting up systems, VINYL is costing me less than half of what it would normally cost."

"The licensing costs we pay are, I believe about 5,000 a month. That's every quarter. We've been doing it for about a year now, and the prices have remained steady. We feel it's a reasonable cost for what we're getting because it's unlimited users. So as big as you want to make it, you're not constrained by a per-user licensing cost or any of those other restrictions, so that's going to stifle your development."

"Pricing was actually one of the things that drew us to the product initially... the way it was licensed at the time, I got a flat monthly fee from Zudy for the Vinyl product, which allowed me to basically have unlimited use of it... We have an annual license, we pay monthly. It's very competitive and very worthwhile given the return we get out of it."

"We have seen a 30 percent decrease in time for some of our workflows."

"You always look for the underlying cost, there's always underlying costs but the value is fine. I don't think it should cost any more. You pay for the software but you're also paying for their employees, when they work onsite for you."

"The pricing and the licensing of Zudy are reasonable. Pricing is always a tricky thing. It could be a little simpler, but they're doing well. I'm happy with it."

"Our licensing costs are approximately 100K annually, and from my perspective, that really is quite the value with the flexibility and what we're getting from the product."

"The pricing is moderate. It's okay."

More Jitterbit Vinyl pricing and cost advice

"It's not expensive when you consider what it provides: low-code/no-code development, faster development time, good quality, and good stability."

"Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is much too expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Consumer Goods Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

The tool is very easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

I actually don't have much experience with pricing, so I can't comment on it right now.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service?

There was a requirement to build a custom form to raise AI invoices, using Oracle Fusion. We created a form, and another use case was that users wanted to create and update customers.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Power Apps vs Jitterbit Vinyl

Compared 100% of the time

More Jitterbit Vinyl Competitors

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 27% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 13% of the time

OutSystems vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Compared 11% of the time

More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Vinyl

August 2025

Download Jitterbit Vinyl product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

August 2025

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service report

Download Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service product report

Overview

Jitterbit's Vinyl (previously Zudy) is an enterprise low-code application platform that makes it easy to build scalable, end-to-end apps that are easily integrated with new and existing systems. Designed for large enterprises to solve complex business problems at scale, Vinyl empowers anyone to create fully integrated, bi-directional applications in weeks. Powerful enough for Full Stack Developers, intuitive enough for Citizen Developers/Business Technologists, Vinyl empowers you to create secure apps that run on any device, automate any business process, and integrate any data source without coding.

Create fully integrated, bi-directional applications
Utilize guided development and visual rule builders
Predictable pricing with no per-user fees
Integrate the entire ecosystem without impacting source data
Protect apps with enterprise-grade security
Integrate real-time data
Deploy apps via enterprise cloud, on-premise or hosted
Improve customer digital experience

For more information: www.jitterbit.com/product/viny

Jitterbit

Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is a cloud-based software development Platform as a Service (PaaS) and a hosted environment for your application development infrastructure. It provides an open-source standards-based solution to develop, collaborate on, and deploy applications within Oracle Cloud.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Aetna, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc., Alvarez and Marsal, Audacy, Barstool Sports, Brooks Brothers, Cal-Maine Foods Inc., CNH Financial, Collette Travel, Darn Tough Vermont, DXL, Fresh Direct, iHeartMedia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, JBS Foods, J.Crew, Kraft Sports Group, MEMIC, New England Patriots, PGT Trucking Inc., United Healthcare, Worley

Transcom Worldwide, Latham Pool Products

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Vinyl vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

July 2025

Free Report: Jitterbit Vinyl vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Jitterbit Vinyl vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jitterbit Vinyl vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service report.

See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.