JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management comparison

JFrog and Qualys are both solutions in the Software Supply Chain Security category. JFrog is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0, while Qualys is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.0. JFrog holds a 1.9% mindshare in SSCS, compared to Qualys’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of JFrog users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Qualys users who would recommend it.

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Read 3 JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform reviews

1,582 Views
127 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Read 35 Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management reviews

3,574 Views
250 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform and Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management compete in DevOps and cybersecurity. JFrog appears more favorable in pricing and customer service, while Qualys leads in security features.

Features: JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform focuses on seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines, comprehensive artifact management, and automation system support. It aims to enhance DevOps process efficiency. Qualys specializes in asset discovery, vulnerability assessment, and robust security protocols, catering to security-driven teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JFrog provides straightforward deployment with strong customer support to quickly resolve integration challenges. Qualys involves a complex deployment but offers detailed documentation and responsive assistance to manage its advanced security features. JFrog is preferred for rapid implementation, whereas Qualys targets organizations needing extensive security measures.

Pricing and ROI: JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform typically comes with a lower initial setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious buyers with increased DevOps efficiency offering substantial ROI. Qualys requires a higher setup investment but provides significant value through enhanced security and compliance, justifying the expense to security-focused buyers.

To learn more, read our detailed JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

DevSecOps (11th)

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset ...

Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security

4th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (7th), Patch Management (4th), Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (3rd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Software Supply Chain Security category, the mindshare of JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform is 1.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management is 2.4%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Supply Chain Security Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management	2.4%
JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform	1.9%
Other	95.7%

Software Supply Chain Security

Featured Reviews

Fredierick Saladas

DevOps Lead at Standard Chartered Bank

Provides superior integration options and comprehensive reporting features

The product could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with older software systems and more customizable reporting options. Improved support for mobile devices would also be advantageous, allowing team members to access the system more effectively while on the go. In the next release, we would like to see advanced analytics features, including predictive analytics to help forecast project outcomes. Additionally, a more robust mobile app with offline capabilities would be valuable for remote work scenarios.

Read full review

Arshad N. R.

Cyber Security Specialist at UBS Financial

Customized dashboards and quick deployment support comprehensive asset management

We use the True Risk Score for vulnerability prioritization, though we do not solely rely upon it since some assets may be decommissioned soon or not in use. From Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, we primarily focus on internet-facing assets. We have created separate tasks for internet-facing assets and track the True Risk dashboard specifically for these assets. If the True Risk Score is higher for any internet-facing assets, then we take action accordingly. The True Risk Score is very helpful for prioritization. The initial setup was straightforward and easy. We needed to create customized tags, group them twice, and validate whether the operating system detection was true positive or false positive. We encountered some false positives, which required coordination with the IT team for verification. In six months, we had approximately 20-25 machines that needed verification on a weekly basis. We coordinated with the IT team to identify the exact operating system specifications.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"They have a professional service team that works alongside their engineering and performance teams."

"The most valuable features include task tracking and reporting capabilities."

"I appreciate the features in JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform, especially the efficient file management where downloads and uploads are optimized, saving time. The storage efficiency is also great as it avoids redundancy, which is crucial for our team. It is also quite easy to use, especially for basic commands through the command line. It's straightforward for us internally, and our data is well-hosted on their servers, which makes data location and querying fast and efficient. Moving our storage to JFrog has streamlined our development cycle by eliminating duplicated data, which previously took up extra space locally. This efficiency is crucial for our workflow, although network speeds still play a significant role in performance."

"I really enjoy the flexibility of the interface setup configuration for my network VLANs, which makes it very easy to configure."

"The most valuable features of Qualys CSAM include the ability to manage authorized and unauthorized applications efficiently. This feature helps in validating applications and maintaining a secure environment."

"The comprehensive view that Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management gives us on our assets enables us to go to a single screen and get a good idea of our holistic asset count."

"I appreciate the feature that simplifies cloud security posture, offering insights into vulnerabilities, and reducing the complexity of managing the security program."

"The most valuable aspect we receive from Qualys is the remediation."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management has helped to improve the organization's security posture significantly."

"The support has been excellent; they are responsive and effectively bring in the appropriate resources to help solve problems."

"Qualys CSAM helps find all the assets. It categorizes information based on various criteria such as host and tenant version. It provides in-depth visibility into both hardware and software."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pros

Cons

"Our locations are in different environments, so the remote server takes time to catch up, causing replication delays. The engineering team suggested that this issue would be resolved, but I'm not sure if it has been addressed yet. This is more of a feature enhancement that we suggested."

"The product could benefit from enhanced integration capabilities with older software systems and more customizable reporting options."

"We have encountered stability issues lately, particularly with frequent 500 internal server errors. Despite efforts from our DevOps team to adjust settings, these issues persist, affecting our workflow, especially with machine learning data uploads. Overall, while it's beneficial for storage and accessibility, stability issues need improvement for seamless operations. The occasional occurrence of internal server errors takes several minutes to resolve on their own and can disrupt workflows. Another concern is that sometimes files appear to be successfully uploaded, but then they cannot be downloaded, with no error message indicating the issue during the upload process. This inconsistency needs to be addressed by JFrog to ensure reliable functionality for users like us."

"Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management could be more cost-effective by offering a lower price point or integrating with existing VMDR features."

"The product stability has notably declined over the last two months, and the performance to fulfill a page request is very slow compared to its previous performance."

"There can be further simplification to reduce the overall noise and provide ESAM-related data."

"Further research and development are needed to enhance integration with other cloud agents and products, particularly improving communication with external products and vendors."

"Based on the company's budget, Qualys offers limited features, which can also be utilized in other environments."

"One improvement that they can make in the EASM module is the scan frequency. After EASM is configured the first time, it allows you to do the complete configuration, but if you want to reconfigure it, it will not ask or provide any option for scan frequency. For that, you need to raise a case with Qualys and talk to the Qualys team."

"With Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management, it was very difficult to extract detections from the system."

"Some areas that would be helpful are more comprehensive tagging and the ability to set up better dynamic rules."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Regarding pricing, I focus on the platform's interface and user communication rather than costs."

"The product pricing is competitive but worth negotiating for volume discounts or longer-term contracts."

"The Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management pricing is well-aligned with our usage."

"Qualys is competitively priced for its features. Its pricing is suitable for large organizations with more than 4,000 assets, but for smaller organizations with few assets, such as banks, the costs might be high. They should come up with packages that are suitable for small organizations."

"The pricing is market-competitive."

"Though the solution is considered expensive, if bundled with other services such as VMDR or cloud agents, its value would significantly increase. It is currently a bit costly, but with bundling, it could become attractive to more customers."

"The pricing for Qualys CSAM is nominal."

"The pricing for Qualys Cybersecurity Asset Management is reasonable, with an annual subscription costing around $1,000 per year or a monthly subscription starting at approximately $72 per month, depending on the specific package and features included."

"The pricing is fair. I would love to see the price come down a little bit, but we do get a lot of value out of it. We are squeezing every ounce of value we can out of the tool."

"The pricing is reasonable relative to the features provided, as it collects all module data and operates as a main, centralized inventory, making it a cost-effective solution."

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Supply Chain Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

19%

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

University

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	23

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform?

Overall, the solution has been a great asset to our team. I advise investing time in the initial setup and training to leverage its capabilities fully. Ensure you clearly understand your needs and ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform?

The product pricing is competitive but worth negotiating for volume discounts or longer-term contracts. Licensing options are flexible, but ensure you understand the terms and any additional costs ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I'm not entirely sure about the pricing; I don't know.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I think the one thing Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management can do better is the package management and the updating process. Knowing that you can't update any of the packages until you've done the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

I primarily use it for a small, single-site, multi-source setup with multi-WAN inputs. I have a main fiber connection and a couple of failovers while managing different networks across different se...

See all answers

Comparisons

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 25% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 22% of the time

GitLab vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 19% of the time

Checkmarx One vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 18% of the time

n8n vs JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform

Compared 15% of the time

More JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform Competitors

Armis vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 6% of the time

Axonius vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 5% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

Bitsight vs Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Software Supply Chain Security

January 2026

Download JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

January 2026

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report

Download Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management product report

Overview

The JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform optimizes software development life cycles through robust artifact management, CI/CD automation, and strong version control. Notable for its security features, it supports seamless software version maintenance and vulnerability scanning. Praised for enhancing organizational efficiency, it ensures faster, secure deliveries, improving collaboration within teams.

JFrog

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management provides key features including asset inventory management, end-of-life tracking, dynamic tagging, and integration with CMDB, offering extensive visibility and support for proactive threat response.

Qualys offers comprehensive visibility across hardware and software assets, aiding in tracking unauthorized applications and facilitating automated vulnerability remediation. Its user-friendly interface and dynamic risk scoring enhance security posture management. Users leverage it for vulnerability management and compliance, benefiting from real-time risk identification and efficient operations in cloud and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management?

Asset Inventory Management: Provides detailed visibility over hardware and software assets.
End-of-Life Tracking: Helps identify technical debt by pinpointing outdated hardware and software.
Dynamic Tagging: Allows flexible classification and categorization of assets.
Real-Time Risk Identification: Detects risks as they arise, enhancing threat response capabilities.
CMDB Integration: Streamlines data integration for comprehensive asset insights.

What benefits should users look for in Qualys reviews?

Improved Security Posture: Enables proactive threat management and streamlined operations.
Efficient Remediation: Automates vulnerability management and patch deployment.
User-Friendly Operations: Simplifies cybersecurity operations with an intuitive interface.
Comprehensive Asset Visibility: Offers unparalleled insight into organizational assets.
Scalable Solutions: Facilitates asset tracking across cloud and on-premises environments.

Cybersecurity teams in various industries, such as financial services, healthcare, and manufacturing, utilize Qualys to manage technical debt through end-of-life tracking and facilitate robust patch management. It supports compliance and visibility initiatives, essential for maintaining data integrity and operational security in dynamic environments.

Qualys

Buyer's Guide

JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

December 2025

Free Report: JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management

Find out what your peers are saying about JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JFrog DevOps Cloud Platform vs. Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management report.

See our list of best Software Supply Chain Security vendors.

We monitor all Software Supply Chain Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.