No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Infracost vs Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Infracost
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
67th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
488th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2801481 - PeerSpot reviewer
SRE II at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
Shift-left cost insights have made teams question infrastructure changes in everyday reviews
The best features Infracost offers include shift-left visibility, so we see the impact before it actually happens, and we do not manually consult with cloud pricing each time, and we do not guess. We have precise information instead. It pulls the pricing difference and drops it in the code review interface. Having that precise information in the code review interface makes us question the changes. Infracost has positively impacted my organization by enhancing our engineering team's cost consciousness. We no longer treat the FinOps operations as something that we do at the end of the month. We do this regularly and this changes a lot for us, so this is super important.
Azam S M - PeerSpot reviewer
Infrastructure Lead at Danat Fz LLC
Container workloads have run reliably and now support secure, customizable services
It is important that Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages has long-term support for mission-critical operations, because there are applications which need to be updated if we are going with a newer version. I do not see areas for improvement in Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages because it satisfies our requirements. Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages is 99% stable and reliable. It is not our primary OS; we are using it for specific services for containers and specific services. We have also introduced AI into the platform. For example, if an updated version of Redis is available, that updated version will not be available in Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages repository. In that case, we have to pull it directly from the Redis servers and install it manually for it to work for us. I give this product a rating of 9.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Infracost has positively impacted my organization by helping me reduce my infrastructure cost and review expenses, and I am able to remove all unnecessary infrastructure."
"Infracost has positively impacted my organization by enhancing our engineering team's cost consciousness."
"Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages is easy to learn, which is my favorite part about it, as the commands are very easy."
"Regarding value for money, organizations that provide services typically use Ubuntu as their primary OS, which is secure, compatible, and developer-friendly, allowing our DevOps team to utilize it effectively for daily deployments and configurations."
 

Cons

"Infracost could be improved in terms of processing and the user interface, as there are times that these aspects could be enhanced."
"I would appreciate some improvements in terms of processing speed, and I would be happy to see a slightly better user interface from my perspective, but everything else is excellent."
"There are a few applications that are not easy to deploy on Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages, so we need to have some workarounds for that."
"Despite mentioning many advantages, an area for improvement in Ubuntu is its application support, as it lacks many GUI-friendly applications that are available on Windows or macOS, which limits usability for tasks requiring specific software."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
45%
Transportation Company
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Infracost?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been great.
What needs improvement with Infracost?
I would appreciate some improvements in terms of processing speed, and I would be happy to see a slightly better user interface from my perspective, but everything else is excellent.
What is your primary use case for Infracost?
My main use case for Infracost is tracking and analyzing the cost impact of infrastructure changes before they are actually provisioned. This manages the entire multi-cloud infrastructure that we a...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages?
We are going with the open source version and are not purchasing Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages.
What needs improvement with Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages?
There are a few applications that are not easy to deploy on Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages, so we need to have some workarounds for that. For example, certain appli...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Infracost vs. Ubuntu 20 (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS) (ARM) | Support by SupportedImages and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.