Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAP Hybris PCM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Informatica Intelligent Dat...
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
185
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (2nd), Data Quality (1st), Business Process Management (BPM) (11th), Business-to-Business Middleware (5th), API Management (8th), Cloud Data Integration (3rd), Data Governance (2nd), Test Data Management (3rd), Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions (1st), Data Management Platforms (DMP) (2nd), Data Masking (2nd), Metadata Management (1st), Test Data Management Services (3rd), Product Information Management (PIM) (1st), Data Observability (2nd)
SAP Hybris PCM
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Master Data Management (MDM) Software (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Data Integration and Access solutions, they serve different purposes. Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) is designed for Data Management Platforms (DMP) and holds a mindshare of 15.5%, up 13.7% compared to last year.
SAP Hybris PCM, on the other hand, focuses on Master Data Management (MDM) Software, holds 1.9% mindshare, down 2.9% since last year.
Data Management Platforms (DMP)
Master Data Management (MDM) Software
 

Q&A Highlights

Dec 28, 2015
 

Featured Reviews

Raj Sethupathi - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers profiling and address standardization but can be complicated
Informatica Data Quality has its data warehouse, primarily using Oracle and some SQL databases. You need a database to host the data. The cleansed version of the data is stored in the data warehouse. It integrates with PowerCenter and other Informatica tools. The integration details can be complex, but a regional setup is involved in this process. Profiling smaller datasets, such as 10,000-50,000 records, worked fine. However, unexpected issues could arise with larger datasets, such as thousands of records or more, especially with tables containing many columns. Handling tables with fifty or more columns can be challenging, even in Excel. A mismatch in data types could cause the entire system to crash. Continual enhancements are being made to address these issues, which can be unique to specific industries like finance and healthcare.
Mohamed Messaoud - PeerSpot reviewer
It has a good architecture and it's easy to maintain
We work with various clients and use Hybris for selling different kinds of products, including merchandise, electronics, ticket reservations, electronics, and food Hybris is stable and has good architecture. It's easy to maintain.  They can change their backend because it's a little hard to work…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The metadata management of Informatica is great."
"Able to customize data search and data sharing."
"We've used the solution for quite some time, so in our organization, the product is pretty mature."
"The profiling feature in Informatica Data Quality is incredibly effective for data governance."
"The mass ingestion functionality and the elasticity of the solution are great."
"It's good for tool management, maintaining the golden record of customer status."
"The way that the solution scans is very useful."
"The data quality component is very good."
"Hybris is stable and has good architecture. It's easy to maintain."
 

Cons

"The customer servive and support could be faster. There is a slow turnaround."
"It needs to be a little more intuitive but it’s really not bad."
"I have received feedback from certain teams and there is a steep learning curve to use this solution."
"The GUI needs to be a little more user-friendly and appealing."
"We cannot sell the product directly with an additional layer."
"Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog could improve by having a much better user interface. It is not user-friendly."
"Managing the licenses with the on-premises version was difficult."
"They need more feature flexibility, as it is not fully developed."
"They can change their backend because it's a little hard to work with. They could streamline it with new technology."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Informatica MDM's pricetag should come down. They have to cut some costs."
"The solution is very expensive."
"It's an expensive solution."
"Informatica Axon is expensive."
"It's pretty high for us. It's more on the higher side, like low to middle high."
"It's a very expensive solution"
"Informatica MDM's price could be lower."
"Comparatively, their prices are a little bit too high."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Management Platforms (DMP) solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

Dec 28, 2015
Dec 28, 2015
I have participate in two customer integration projects for financial sector. First was connected with custom MDM, second was Informatica MDM implementation. If you plan build own MDM solution you have consider: - integration with current architecture (bulk loading via MDM, real-time integration via ESB) - use data quality tool for information matching (ex QualityStage or IDQ) - data steward in...
2 out of 4 answers
it_user150675 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 8, 2015
I was part of evaluating several vendors for MDM program at my company and after technically evaluating each of them, Informatica was the choice. It doesn't make sense to build one as the tools available in the market are sufficient to satisfy the needs of MDM program. please let me know if you need help with vendor evaluation, RFP, implementation strategy etc..
Ariel Lindenfeld - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 8, 2015
@nitesh- Do you have a vendor evaluation matrix you can share with the community?
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
6%
Retailer
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica Cloud Data Integration?
Azure Data Factory is a solid product offering many transformation functions; It has pre-load and post-load transformations, allowing users to apply transformations either in code by using Power Q...
Which Informatica product would you choose - PowerCenter or Cloud Data Integration?
Complex transformations can easily be achieved using PowerCenter, which has all the features and tools to establish a real data governance strategy. Additionally, PowerCenter is able to manage huge...
What are the biggest benefits of using Informatica Cloud Data Integration?
When it comes to cloud data integration, this solution can provide you with multiple benefits, including: Overhead reduction by integrating data on any cloud in various ways Effective integration ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

ActiveVOS, Active Endpoints, BPM, Address Verification, Persistent Data Masking, Cloud Test Data Management, PIM, , Enterprise Data Catalog, Data Integration Hub, Cloud Data Integration, Data Quality, Cloud API and App Integration
SAP Hybris Product Content Management
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

The Travel Company, Carbonite
NHS 24, Wholesale Sports Outdoor Outfitters, Nu Skin Enterprises Inc., FC Bayern Munchen AG, Tumi, The Kellogg Company
Find out what your peers are saying about Palantir, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Management Platforms (DMP). Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.