InfluxDB vs Statseeker comparison

InfluxData and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. InfluxData is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.2, while Techniche is ranked #76. InfluxData holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of InfluxData users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

InfluxDB

Read 20 InfluxDB reviews

6,493 Views
1,818 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

2,440 Views
2,342 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

InfluxDB

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

InfluxDB and Statseeker are products in the domain of data storage and network monitoring. InfluxDB seems to have an upper hand in flexibility and scalability with its open-source environment, while Statseeker focuses on comprehensive network monitoring features.

Features: InfluxDB brings time-series data capabilities, high scalability, and numerous integrations, making it highly versatile for applications. Statseeker emphasizes real-time network monitoring, long data retention, and advanced metrics visualization, which are beneficial for network operations.

Room for Improvement: InfluxDB can improve its network monitoring specialization, user interface for non-technical users, and enhanced security features. Statseeker can benefit from broader data handling capabilities, scalability improvements, and integrating with non-network data sources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: InfluxDB offers flexible self-hosted and cloud deployment options with a comprehensive documentation base. Statseeker, primarily on-premise, offers straightforward installation for robust network monitoring. Both products provide strong support, with Statseeker noted for dedicated customer service in network operations contexts.

Pricing and ROI: InfluxDB often has a lower initial setup cost with its open-source model, ideal for varied data applications. Statseeker requires a higher initial investment due to its specialized network monitoring features, offering strong ROI for network management professionals, justifying its cost for specific use cases.

To learn more, read our detailed InfluxDB vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB vs. Statseeker

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 903,067 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

InfluxDB

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Relational Databases (1st), Open Source Databases (7th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (14th), NoSQL Databases (6th)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

76th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of InfluxDB is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
InfluxDB	0.5%
Statseeker	0.5%
Other	99.0%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

Time series data has been managed efficiently for IoT sensors but reporting still needs improvement

How InfluxDB can be improved is relevant since for Energy Box, we face certain issues. We have customers worldwide, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe, but when we expanded to China two years ago, they indicated that they do not support the cloud version there. Our application is built on the cloud, which required us to create a separate application for Azure China, which was painful for us. The second issue involves frequent version changes. For example, we started with version one, transitioned to version two, and I heard they are considering InfluxDB version three, reverting to earlier practices. InfluxDB should improve without completely changing its approach. Now we have to redo our work for InfluxDB version three. Regarding needed improvements, the documentation is sufficient, but pricing presents a challenge. InfluxDB has standard pricing, which is acceptable for large companies. However, for startups in our position, they should provide special discounts so everyone can utilize it. The pricing should adapt as companies grow, which is a reasonable expectation.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"InfluxDB reduced my time to show data without any interruption, also reducing the number of people needed to manage the project; it is very good to have InfluxDB in my project."

"Prior to InfluxDB usage, real-time data was not visualized and monitored, and after the introduction of InfluxDB in the entire framework, the organization is benefiting a lot in terms of monitoring and understanding performance data in real-time."

"The most valuable features of InfluxDB are the documentation and performance, and the good plugins metrics in the ecosystem."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is we can use InfluxDB to integrate with and plug into any other tools."

"The solution is very powerful."

"InfluxDB works as expected with excellent scalability and stability, which is critical for our application."

"This product has been working well and it is serving our purpose, so I can recommend it to others."

"The most valuable features are aggregating the data and integration with Graphana for monitoring."

More InfluxDB pros

"I am happy to advise others to use this product for monitoring their networks, as it is working so well."

"We haven't encountered any issues with stability."

"It helps us track the status of over 1200 devices in multiple geographical locations."

"I believe Statseeker has reduced the complexity of our network monitoring, providing real-time alerts and on-demand graphs that improve our network availability."

"Grouping, Threshold/alerts, Netflow analyser, Private MIB object support are most valuable as they can provide more visibility into network performance, and for network troubleshooting."

"I like the fact that I can aggregate multiple interfaces into a single graph. It allows me to quickly the summary of traffic for multiple devices which is helpful."

"Customer service is excellent, with a brilliant support team that is always responsive and always positive."

"Summary Reports provide a quick way to identify where potential issues are. Drill-downs provide more granular details very quickly."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"However, I do wish the documentation and community resources around Flux were more extensive and beginner-friendly."

"The interface of InfluxDB is so complex and should be made easier for non-technical people."

"The solution doesn't have much of a user interface."

"InfluxDB cannot be used for high-cardinality data. It's also difficult and time-consuming to write queries, and there are some issues with bulk API."

"It is challenging to get long-running backups while running InfluxDB in a Microsoft Azure Kubernetes cluster."

"InfluxDB can be improved in several ways. The Flux query language needs to be learned, but if there were something similar to SQL or previous options, it would be much easier for users without imposing a learning curve."

"The error logging capability can be improved because the logs are not very informative."

"I haven't seen a return on investment; unfortunately, I cannot share relevant metrics such as time saved, fewer employees needed, or money saved."

More InfluxDB cons

"Technical support for this solution is bad, as is everything with Cisco support."

"Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff."

"The user interface needs a great deal of improvement."

"It may be helpful to have more options in the alerting section."

"I do not feel that this solution is very scalable."

"The main issue I've seen, in the last six months to a year, is when I upgrade I seem to be hitting bugs. The upgrade won't go smoothly and I have to engage support. These things happen when you upgrade, it's not the end of the world, but from a stability point of view, the only time I've so far, is during upgrades."

"It doesn't do absolutely everything and it will require some additional software or hardware support to be a complete single solution."

"It would be very nice to have the Cisco ACI option included in the regular license."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"InfluxDB is open-source, but there are additional costs for scaling."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"We are using the open-source version of InfluxDB."

"The licensing cost is yearly and it's $5,000 to $8,000, I think."

"When it came to selecting this solution, it came down to cost."

"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."

"Statseeker is pretty cheap."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."

"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."

"We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

903,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Marketing Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with InfluxDB?

If the dashboarding facility can be improved in terms of the visualization parameters and the amount of support available from the community, as well as having smarter alerts to send those alerts t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for InfluxDB?

My main use case for InfluxDB is to inject all my performance data and visualize it as a data source into Grafana. My data comes from JMeter from a plugin, which is inserting data to InfluxDB, and ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering InfluxDB?

It is good to start with InfluxDB to stabilize your data, visualize your data, and have the data stored on a time-series basis. I would recommend everyone to get into InfluxDB and start using it. T...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 7% of the time

MySQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

SQLite vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

ClickHouse vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

More InfluxDB Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 20% of the time

Nagios XI vs Statseeker

Compared 9% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Statseeker

Compared 9% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 6% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB

June 2026

Download InfluxDB product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

June 2026

Download Statseeker product report

Overview

InfluxDB offers efficient time series data handling with fast writes, optimized storage, and seamless Grafana integration, making it ideal for high-volume applications like crypto trading and real-time monitoring. Its SQL-like query language and cloud-based options enhance user experience and system scalability.

InfluxDB stands out with its ability to handle high-volume time series data efficiently, thanks to fast data writes and efficient compression. It is highly scalable, providing clustering features for improved performance management. Integration with Grafana enhances visualization, making it easier to analyze complex data through a user-friendly SQL-like query language. Real-time monitoring, historical data access, and proactive alerts enhance system reliability. Its cloud offering simplifies maintenance and operations, making it attractive for users seeking an efficient time series database.

What are the key features of InfluxDB?

Fast Data Writes: Ensures quick data handling necessary for real-time applications.
Optimized Storage: Reduces space requirements and improves performance.
Efficient Compression: Supports high-volume data like time series, enhancing throughput.
Grafana Integration: Supports seamless visualization and analysis of data.
SQL-like Query Language: Simplifies complex data operations with user-friendly queries.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Performance: Fast processing and optimized storage for better application responsiveness.
Scalability: Clustering features ensure adaptability to growing data volumes.
Improved Reliability: Proactive alerts and real-time monitoring prevent system downtimes.
Ease of Use: SQL-like language and intuitive visuals improve user accessibility.

InfluxDB is applied extensively in industries handling high-volume data needs. For sensor data storage in production environments, it offers reliable performance. Its role in server management metrics and performance monitoring is crucial for maintaining optimal operations. In crypto market data collection, it supports fast-paced trading environments. Industries use it for real-time tracking, like maritime vessel monitoring, leveraging its rapid data handling and visualization capabilities. Its applications also extend to IoT environments, API performance tracking, HVAC systems, and log aggregation, often integrating with Prometheus, Docker, and AWS to enhance system capabilities.

InfluxData

Statseeker provides comprehensive network monitoring with features such as interface statistics, bandwidth utilization, and robust alerts for outages and temperature issues.

Statseeker offers extensive network visibility, including Traffic Analyzer, historical data access, and a user-friendly dashboard. Its fast data retrieval and detailed reports improve internal communication and monitoring. The platform's scalability, reliability, and low maintenance make it an efficient choice for network monitoring. Areas for improvement include interface design, NetFlow features, and integration with systems like Dynatrace and Cisco ONS. Reporting could be more intuitive, and enhancements in alerting options, documentation, and configuration management are needed.

What are the key features of Statseeker?

Interface Statistics: Provides detailed data on network interfaces and bandwidth utilization.
Traffic Analyzer: Offers precise traffic analysis tools for better network management.
Historical Data Access: Allows users to retrieve past network performance metrics quickly.
User-Friendly Dashboard: Simplifies navigation and access to critical information.
Scalability: Supports network growth without significant changes to existing setup.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Facilitates in-depth understanding of network performance.
Reliable Alerts: Ensures timely identification of issues with responsive ping alerts.
Ease of Maintenance: Reduces the resources required for ongoing management.
Improved Communication: Utilizes reports for effective internal communication.
Data-Driven Decision Making: Empowers users with real-time and historical statistics.

In industries, Statseeker is implemented for tasks like monitoring up/down status, capacity management, and traffic analysis. Users leverage it to generate reports, manage congestion, and track device performance across network layers. Its ability to provide real-time statistics supports evidence-based decisions for upgrades and improves insight into network availability and device utilization.

Techniche

Sample Customers

ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB vs. Statseeker

June 2026

Free Report: InfluxDB vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about InfluxDB vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

903,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our InfluxDB vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.