Imperva Data Security Fabric and Microsoft Defender for Cloud are two strong competitors in the data security solution category. Based on feature capabilities and integration, Microsoft Defender for Cloud appears to have an advantage due to its seamless integration with Microsoft products and extensive multi-cloud support.
Features: Imperva Data Security Fabric offers robust threat alert notifications, comprehensive database activity monitoring specifically beneficial for legacy systems, and a web application firewall. It enables the creation of fine-grained security policies that are straightforward to configure, aiding in securing complex environments. Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a strong compliance and auditing framework, multi-cloud capabilities, and seamless integration with Microsoft services, strengthening its appeal for enterprises leveraging Microsoft ecosystems.
Room for Improvement: Imperva Data Security Fabric could improve its user experience and reduce the complexity of configuring mainframe mappings and audit logs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud needs to enhance usability and minimize false positives, while also improving automation and clarity in compliance alerts and monitoring.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imperva Data Security Fabric is consistently deployed across various environments, though customer service experiences vary. It supports on-premises, cloud, and hybrid deployments. Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers efficient cloud integrations, particularly with Azure, and usually receives praise for its responsive technical support, making it preferred for cloud-centric deployments.
Pricing and ROI: Imperva Data Security Fabric is perceived as expensive but provides good ROI in large database environments. On the other hand, Microsoft Defender for Cloud presents complex pricing, potentially costly for SMEs, yet integrates well with Microsoft services, offering flexible licensing options. Both solutions offer significant ROI by safeguarding against security threats and compliance issues, though Imperva's upfront costs are generally higher compared to Microsoft’s flexible plans.
My thoughts on the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of the Imperva SecureSphere Database Security are that it could be more competitive.
Defender proactively indexes and analyzes documents, identifying potential threats even when inactive, enhancing preventative security.
Identifying potential vulnerabilities has helped us avoid costly data losses.
The biggest return on investment is the rapid improvement of security posture.
Local vendors provide on-ground support, and if issues cannot be resolved, a support ticket is raised to the OEM via a portal.
Regarding customer support, I would like to see improvements in response time.
Since security is critical, we prefer a quicker response time.
The support team was very responsive to queries.
They understand their product, but much like us, they struggle with the finer details, especially with new features.
The solution works well for large organizations and enterprise levels if appropriately sized during the setup.
The scalability of the Imperva SecureSphere Database Security in accommodating the organization's growth and database security needs is excellent.
We are using infrastructure as a code, so we do not have any scalability issues with Microsoft Defender for Cloud implementation because our cloud automatically does it.
It has multiple licenses and features, covering infrastructures from a hundred to five hundred virtual machines, without any issues.
Defender won't replace our endpoint XDR, but it will likely adapt and support any growth in the Microsoft Cloud space.
It is important to manage it correctly by performing health checks with the vendor.
I rate the stability of Imperva SecureSphere Database Security as nine because there are ongoing integration processes between Imperva and Thales.
Defender's stability has been flawless for us.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is very stable.
Microsoft sometimes changes settings or configurations without transparency.
The archiving functionalities should be enhanced to allow easy conversion of archived logs into CSV or Excel formats for data analysis.
We cannot be competitive by price alone, though in terms of quality, Imperva SecureSphere Database Security is the best compared to Russian import products and building products such as Garda, which attempt to copy Imperva's data activity monitoring and database firewall functionality.
Microsoft, in general, could significantly improve its communication and support.
It would be beneficial to streamline recommendations to avoid unnecessary alerts and to refine the severity of alerts based on specific environments or environmental attributes.
The artificial intelligence features could be expanded to allow the system to autonomously manage security issues without needing intervention from admins.
The price is high, but it is not as high as competitors like IBM, Guardian, and Oracle.
Every time we consider expanding usage, we carefully evaluate the necessity due to cost concerns.
We appreciate the licensing approach based on employee count rather than a big enterprise license.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is pricey, especially for Kubernetes clusters.
The Imperva SecureSphere Database Security has significantly aided my organization in forensic investigations and compliance audits.
Imperva SecureSphere Database Security provides one of the best solutions to analyze data, maintain GDPR compliance, and help investigate any incidents.
If something malicious occurs, I can set a policy to block it, review the action, and decide whether to release it if it's found not to be malicious.
The most valuable feature for me is the variety of APIs available.
This feature significantly aids in threat detection and enhances the user experience by streamlining security management.
The most valuable feature is the recommendations provided on how to improve security.
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 26 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 32 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 26 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 44 |
Imperva Data Security Fabric provides cutting-edge database security, featuring capabilities like activity monitoring, web application firewalls, and real-time alerting for comprehensive data protection.
Imperva Data Security Fabric focuses on securing databases through advanced monitoring, logging, and user behavior analysis. With features designed for ease of configuration, it effectively blocks unauthorized access and maintains detailed audit logs. Integration with other systems and automated reporting enhance vulnerability assessments and compliance efforts. Imperva's data discovery, classification, and masking capabilities strengthen security by managing user rights and uncovering vulnerabilities, making it ideal for protecting sensitive data and supporting forensic and compliance needs.
What are the key features of Imperva Data Security Fabric?Imperva Data Security Fabric is widely used across industries like finance and government, focusing on database security, activity monitoring, and user behavior analysis. It is essential for detecting unauthorized access and preventing data breaches while ensuring compliance. Financial institutions and government agencies leverage its capabilities to maintain data integrity and monitor database activities, implementing firewalls and vulnerability assessments that secure on-premises and cloud environments.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for cloud workloads. It offers real-time visibility into the security posture of cloud environments, enabling organizations to quickly identify and respond to potential threats. With its advanced machine learning capabilities, Microsoft Defender for Cloud can detect and block sophisticated attacks, including zero-day exploits and fileless malware.
The solution also provides automated remediation capabilities, allowing security teams to quickly and easily respond to security incidents. With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, organizations can ensure the security and compliance of their cloud workloads, while reducing the burden on their security teams.
We monitor all Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
