IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why
  • Home
  • IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository vs. Managed Methods JaxView

IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository vs Managed Methods JaxView comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
11th
out of 13 in SOA Governance
Views
60
Comparisons
41
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
12th
out of 13 in SOA Governance
Views
32
Comparisons
5
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere Service Registry and Repository
JaxView
Learn More
IBM
Managed Methods
Overview
IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository provides service registry and repository functions for service-oriented architecture (SOA), enterprise applications for SOAP and REST services. It enables service lifecycle governance to help optimize productivity and resources in an SOA environment.

JaxView from Managed Methods is a versatile tool for Web services management and runtime governance of service-oriented environments.

Offer
Learn more about IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository
Learn More
Learn more about Managed Methods JaxView
Learn More
Sample Customers
ZAO Raiffeisenbank
McLaren, Orlando Utilities Commission, MedAssets, Meridian Health Plan, Trust Co of America, Merkle Inc., United Natural Foods

IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository is ranked 11th in SOA Governance while Managed Methods JaxView is ranked 12th in SOA Governance. IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository is rated 0.0, while Managed Methods JaxView is rated 0.0. On the other hand, IBM WebSphere Service Registry and Repository is most compared with CentraSite, whereas Managed Methods JaxView is most compared with .

See our list of best SOA Governance vendors.

We monitor all SOA Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.