Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Safer Planet vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus comparison

IBM and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category. IBM is ranked #77, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #29. IBM holds a 0.1% mindshare in TIPT, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution.
IBM Safer Planet
  • 174 Views
  • 17 Comparison Views
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Read 7 Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus reviews
  • 1,282 Views
  • 1,051 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between IBM Safer Planet and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Recorded Future, VirusTotal and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Threat Intelligence Platforms Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 864,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Safer Planet
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
77th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms
29th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms category, the mindshare of IBM Safer Planet is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Threat Intelligence Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Use IBM Safer Planet?
Share your opinion
RichPhillips - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers a centralized dashboard for reporting threats and anomalies
The tool along with other suite of products provides us with threat and alert information.  The solution has provided us with a centralized dashboard for reporting threats and anomalies.  I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.  I…
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Performing Arts
10%
Insurance Company
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
While Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is effective, I always prefer to have a second source of threat intelligence feed to ensure coverage for zero-day vulnerabilities that might be missed. This is mo...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
I use Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus ( /products/palo-alto-networks-autofocus-reviews ) for threat intelligence. Palo Alto Networks has its own threat intelligence team, Unit 42, which analyzes submi...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus?
I would rate Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus a ten out of ten. I always activate it when purchasing Palo Alto Networks products because it's simple to deploy and beneficial. However, for non-Palo Alto...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Recorded Future vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Logo
Recorded Future vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Compared 36% of the time
Anomali vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Logo
Anomali vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Compared 36% of the time
Cisco Threat Grid vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Logo
Cisco Threat Grid vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
Compared 29% of the time
More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
July 2025
IBM Safer Planet reportDownload IBM Safer Planet product report
Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
July 2025
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus reportDownload Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Palo Alto Threat Intelligence Management
 

Overview

Help your clients operate faster than the speed of threat by turning large amounts of disparate data into actionable intelligence for mission critical decision making. Whether it is protecting your country, community or corporation, IBM Safer Planet solutions help rapidly uncover time sensitive insights about attackers and their motivations and methods.Thus, you can proactively adjust and enhance your security measures against them.
IBM

AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

Palo Alto Networks
 

Sample Customers

Department of Science and Technology of the Republic of the Philippines, Rochester Police Department
Telkom Indonesia
Buyer's Guide
Threat Intelligence Platforms
July 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Recorded Future, VirusTotal and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.