IBM Rational Test Workbench vs Telerik Test Studio comparison

IBM and Progress Software are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. IBM is ranked #36, while Progress Software is ranked #25. IBM holds a 0.2% mindshare in TAt, compared to Progress Software’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Read 4 IBM Rational Test Workbench reviews

130 Views
71 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

674 Views
428 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Telerik Test Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

IBM Rational Test Workbench and Telerik Test Studio are competing products in the automated testing space. IBM shows strength in integration with its ecosystem, while Telerik leads with ease of use and quick setup.

Features: IBM Rational Test Workbench supports extensive test management, service virtualization, and robust integration with IBM tools. It is suitable for complex test environments and offers powerful API, performance, and service virtualization testing. Telerik Test Studio offers an intuitive interface with powerful automation, including features like PDF validation, an object repository for element reuse, and an efficient record and playback feature.

Room for Improvement: IBM Rational Test Workbench could benefit from a smoother deployment process, less complexity in initial setup, and more direct support for agile methodologies. Telerik Test Studio may improve by expanding its integration options, enhancing reporting functionality, and offering more advanced test management features for large-scale environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Telerik Test Studio is known for its straightforward deployment suited to agile workflows and responsive customer support. IBM Rational Test Workbench offers comprehensive support but tends to require more time for integration due to complexity, making it more appealing for firms already using IBM solutions.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational Test Workbench generally incurs higher initial costs due to its extensive features and integration capacities, which can result in a longer ROI period. In contrast, Telerik Test Studio's pricing model is more accessible, promising faster ROI by focusing on generating immediate value, appealing to small and mid-sized enterprises seeking cost-effectiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Telerik Test Studio Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Telerik Test Studio

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Test Workbench

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

36th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (19th), API Testing Tools (15th)

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (24th), Load Testing Tools (22nd), Regression Testing Tools (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Rational Test Workbench is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 0.8%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1513668

IT Specialist, ITE at a government with 10,001+ employees

Good reporting and interface, but supports limited types of protocols and requires low-level script editing

It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script.

Read full review

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution provides for API testing, functional UI testing, performance testing, and service virtualization."

"Reporting is pretty good. Its interface is also good. I'm overall pretty happy with the functionality and use of IBM Rational Test Workbench."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

Cons

"There are a number of things that they can do to simplify the tools, but the most important thing that they need to do is simplify the installation."

"It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is a little bit on the higher side, although it is really good."

"It doesn't really concern me. Licensing is on a yearly basis."

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

32%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

ReadyAPI Test vs IBM Rational Test Workbench

Compared 100% of the time

More IBM Rational Test Workbench Competitors

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 38% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 18% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 17% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 13% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 7% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

April 2025

Download IBM Rational Test Workbench product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

April 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Also Known As

Rational Test Workbench, IBM Rational Performance Tester, IBM Functional Tester, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server

No data available

Overview

IBM Rational Test Workbench provides a comprehensive test automation solution for mobile applications, regression testing, integration technologies and performance and scalability testing. It helps you build intelligent and interconnected enterprise applications that can be deployed on traditional and cloud infrastructures. With Rational Test Workbench, you can significantly reduce test cycle times, moving integration testing earlier in the development lifecycle.

IBM

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

Financial Insurance Management Corp.

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Telerik Test Studio

April 2025

Free Report: IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Telerik Test Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Telerik Test Studio and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Rational Test Workbench vs. Telerik Test Studio report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.