IBM InfoSphere Optim vs Nutanix Database Service comparison

IBM and Nutanix are both solutions in the Database Development and Management category. IBM is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.0, while Nutanix is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8. IBM holds a 2.6% mindshare in DDM, compared to Nutanix’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

IBM InfoSphere Optim

Read 4 IBM InfoSphere Optim reviews

545 Views
223 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Nutanix Database Service

Read 29 Nutanix Database Service reviews

1,437 Views
238 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

IBM InfoSphere Optim

Nutanix Database Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

IBM InfoSphere Optim and Nutanix Database Service compete in the database management solutions category. Nutanix Database Service appears to have the advantage due to its advanced features that justify the investment.

Features: IBM InfoSphere Optim supports data privacy, archiving, and lifecycle management effectively. Its focus on data governance secures compliance and data security. Nutanix Database Service simplifies database management and automation, offering scalability and integration across diverse environments, highlighting automated operations and adaptability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM InfoSphere Optim involves traditional deployment with ample support resources, ensuring structured implementation. Nutanix Database Service streamlines deployment through cloud-based solutions, facilitating quicker integration and flexible management, emphasizing reduced complexity and customer autonomy.

Pricing and ROI: IBM InfoSphere Optim offers competitive initial setup costs with a favorable ROI by reducing data management expenses over time. Nutanix Database Service may have higher upfront costs but offers a better ROI through enhanced operational efficiency and reduced management overhead. IBM focuses on cost-effectiveness initially, while Nutanix emphasizes long-term savings with modern database innovations.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Nutanix Database Service Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Nutanix Database Service

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM InfoSphere Optim

Ranking in Database Development and Management

15th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nutanix Database Service

Ranking in Database Development and Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Database Development and Management category, the mindshare of IBM InfoSphere Optim is 2.6%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nutanix Database Service is 3.5%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database Development and Management

Featured Reviews

Kenneth Estanislao

Solutions Designer at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Backups become efficient while cost concerns remain

I am still working with IBM and we are transitioning to other tools rather than using IBM InfoSphere Optim. We use other tools, but I cannot recall the name because I am not the one currently handling it. It has transitioned to other architects. For IBM InfoSphere Optim, we are still currently using it, but we have transitioned to the newer version, the latest one with support for AWS S3. I cannot identify a main competitor for IBM InfoSphere Optim because we have transitioned to other architects, and they are the ones looking for other tools. The last comparison I did was almost 4 years ago. I am not using any AI technology with IBM InfoSphere Optim. I rate IBM InfoSphere Optim a seven out of ten. The tool is good, but the price is not favorable as it is the most expensive part. I can recommend IBM InfoSphere Optim for enterprises.

Read full review

Prasad Pimple

Vice President Information Technology at network techlab

Enhancing database management with operational efficiency but needs better compatibility

Era should be compatible with various environments, such as VMware and Red Hat, to be hypervisor agnostic. Due to increasing adoption among enterprise clients, integration with Kubernetes platforms is also needed. Furthermore, the product can benefit from improving its understanding of architectural setup and communicating its limitations to users and partners.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We like that we can easily restore the database with just a few clicks. The database is linked as well."

"The compression feature is valuable because it achieves around 80% compression."

"I feel the solution to be a bit faster than the traditional methods, which makes it easy to customize."

"The Time Machine feature in Nutanix Database Service has definitely reduced turnaround time for when we need clones or other environments spun up off of our existing environment, such as for corruption."

"The solution allows quick setting up of new development environments and ensures the use of the storage more efficiently. It manages to create new clients to be utilized for development or reporting."

"One feature that is very good is the backup and validation process that's built into Era."

"The time to provision the database went from taking a couple of days to now taking a few minutes. That is the immediate impact we saw. It helped the team to focus more. They can now be focused on support rather than spending time provisioning, which is a repetitive activity."

"I wanted a tool that offers enough monitoring for everything related to load balancing in my databases."

"I like how easy it is to implement MySQL, SQL, and open-source database platforms."

"We have an enterprise-level backup product that we're required to use, so we don't rely on Era's version. [But] it could be an awesome first-line backup. It's very elegant the way they designed it. It's quick and it doesn't take up nearly as much storage space as traditional backups. It would definitely help to save on tier-one storage."

"The provisioning and other features of Nutanix Database Service have improved my company by making it easy to deploy the databases, and DBAs can just deploy what they need as needed instead of having to manually create VMs for them individually and install the databases and setting everything up with DBAs provisioning databases themselves."

More Nutanix Database Service pros

Cons

"While the solution is very supportive of Db2, it is not so friendly when it comes to IMS databases."

"The potential room for improvement for IBM InfoSphere Optim is usually its cost, as it is too expensive."

"We're looking for a solution that can be implemented on AWS. IBM InfoSphere Optim can be implemented on AWS, but it costs more than double what we're currently paying. So, it's not really of good value for us."

"The graphical user interfaces could be much more user-friendly. They are already user-friendly, but they could be simpler so that we do not need L3 staff to handle them. If they were simpler, we could also have some command center or L1/L1.5 associates do some housekeeping activities on it."

"Era should be compatible with various environments, such as VMware and Red Hat, to be hypervisor agnostic."

"We have a regular license program because it's really expensive."

"One of the things that we've discovered specific to SQL is that the deployment options that are available do not match our company standards, so we have asked the Nutanix team if that is something that is customizable or if we need to adjust our deployment strategy. That's the only thing that we've discovered so far."

"I don't have a comprehensive answer because we're not utilizing it extensively."

"The solution should provide more integration with more databases."

"The downside of this solution is that it's more expensive than its competitors."

"The patching should be a one-button function. Also, it works about 80 percent of the time, but 20 percent of the time it requires manual intervention. And sometimes, until you understand the technical underpinnings of that process, you can't fix it. I thought we would move past that. In the last version, they broke a big chunk of that for me, and that's why I'm waiting for the new release because they promised me it would fix the problem."

More Nutanix Database Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM InfoSphere Optim is a very expensive solution. Actually, it's the most expensive archiving solution that we have."

"The pricing is competitive."

"Licensing costs will be the main scalability problem."

"It is amazing. The pricing compared to the time saved is nothing. It's worth the cost."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."

"This solution is reasonably priced."

"It's priced fairly... It's a good value. When you go looking for something from Oracle that automates things and makes your life easier, it's always going to be a minimum of $500,000. Era's nothing like that."

"Not everyone can afford it. It's a bit expensive, so the price has to be improved."

More Nutanix Database Service pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

27%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM InfoSphere Optim?

The potential room for improvement for IBM InfoSphere Optim is usually its cost, as it is too expensive. Currently, there are no issues with IBM InfoSphere Optim; the only problem is the cost, whic...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM InfoSphere Optim?

My current use case for IBM InfoSphere Optim is just for doing backups. We are using IBM InfoSphere Optim specifically for backup purposes.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM InfoSphere Optim?

See all answers

What do you like most about Nutanix Database Service?

The most valuable feature is its robust infrastructure management tools.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Database Service?

It is amazing. The pricing compared to the time saved is nothing. It's worth the cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Database Service?

It has already saved me a lot of time, but it can still improve. In the past, there were built-in templates, and now, for some particular databases, I have to create my own templates and push them ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Informatica Data Archive vs IBM InfoSphere Optim

Compared 47% of the time

Solix Enterprise Data Management vs IBM InfoSphere Optim

Compared 28% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs IBM InfoSphere Optim

Compared 26% of the time

More IBM InfoSphere Optim Competitors

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Nutanix Database Service

Compared 38% of the time

Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials vs Nutanix Database Service

Compared 26% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs Nutanix Database Service

Compared 20% of the time

EDB Postgres Enterprise Manager vs Nutanix Database Service

Compared 16% of the time

More Nutanix Database Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

May 2025

Download IBM InfoSphere Optim product report

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Database Service

May 2025

Download Nutanix Database Service product report

Also Known As

IBM Optim, Optim

Nutanix Era

Overview

IBM Optim solutions manage data from requirements to retirement. They boost performance, empower collaboration, and improve governance across applications, databases and platforms. By managing data properly over its lifetime, organisations are better equipped to support business goals with less risk.

IBM

Nutanix Database Service (NDB) simplifies and automates database lifecycle management across on-premises and public clouds for Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle Database, PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MongoDB databases.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

Durham Police Department, Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc., Continental, KCE Electronics Public Company Limited, The University of Adelaide, Migros Zurich, COPROB

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

Buyer's Guide

IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Nutanix Database Service

June 2025

Free Report: IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Nutanix Database Service

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Nutanix Database Service and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Nutanix Database Service report.

See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.

We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.