IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog vs SAP Information Steward comparison

IBM and SAP are both solutions in the Metadata Management category. IBM is ranked #10, while SAP is ranked #12. IBM holds a 2.9% mindshare in MM, compared to SAP’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 72% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

IBM InfoSphere Information ...

Read 9 IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog reviews

1,028 Views
1,028 Comparison Views

72% willing to recommend

SAP Information Steward

Read 9 SAP Information Steward reviews

2,013 Views
845 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM InfoSphere Information ...

SAP Information Steward

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

SAP Information Steward and IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog compete in data governance. IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog has the upper hand in features, which many find justifies its cost and complexity.

Features: SAP Information Steward provides data profiling, metadata management, and data quality monitoring, with a strong focus on user-friendly data visualization and quality trend analysis. IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog offers comprehensive metadata management, lineage tracking, and policy enforcement that serve as powerful tools for managing information assets.

Room for Improvement: SAP Information Steward could enhance its integration capabilities and expand its advanced analytics options while simplifying complex functionalities for better usability. IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog might benefit from streamlining its setup process, enhancing its user interface, and improving the system's learning curve for faster user adoption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Information Steward is generally easier to deploy due to its straightforward setup procedures and offers proactive customer service. IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog involves a more complex deployment, but reliable customer support assists in managing its sophisticated implementation, helping balance initial setup challenges.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Information Steward is more budget-friendly, leading to a faster ROI with its quick setup. IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog requires a higher initial investment owing to its extensive capabilities, yet the advanced features offer substantial ROI over time as businesses utilize its comprehensive data governance in expansive data environments.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog vs. SAP Information Steward Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog vs. SAP Information Steward

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM InfoSphere Information ...

Ranking in Metadata Management

10th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Information Steward

Ranking in Metadata Management

12th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Quality (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Metadata Management category, the mindshare of IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is 2.9%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Information Steward is 3.1%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Metadata Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog	2.9%
SAP Information Steward	3.1%
Other	94.0%

Metadata Management

Featured Reviews

Data Architect Insurance Co.

Data Architect at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Provides good catalog integration but requires too much coding

This is a complex solution and quite expensive. The technology has changed and I think IBM needs to be more flexible with their licensing model. We've been with them for over 10 years and they were unable to provide decent options for us. As the consumer, they weren't offering much flexibility and certainly not the support we were looking for given our long-standing relationship with them. There is also too much coding required compared with other solutions where you can do a lot directly in the environment and see how the policies apply.

Read full review

FranciscoSantos

Director at Pixel Studio PTY

Provides accurate data that is validated against a personalized reference tool

For most SAP customers, Information Steward is enough because it is able to build quality data rules to detect issues in the source systems like SAP HANA, Business Warehouse, or other systems. A business user can first organize their data into several data domains. For example, procurement, human resources, and logistics setup. The domains can build data quality dimensions where you can describe the kind of rule that you are going to use. The user then can immediately see if something is wrong with their data using traffic lights. Another great feature of SAP Information Steward is the accuracy that the content is followed by validating against the reference tool. With the solution, you are creating data quality dimensions. Within these dimensions, you are creating business data quality rules that are looking for specific fields. From these rules, you can create a scorecard. The scorecard will highlight the percentage of good data and ensure the user can feel confident that the data is accurate within predetermined limits. SAP tables have field names that are very cryptic, making them hard to understand the meaning of the fields. Metapedia helps describe these fields in business terms.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to create special rules inside the solution using Portuguese is the most valuable feature."

"Working on the roles, actually, is the most valuable aspect."

"Anyone looking into using IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog should go for it because it's a leading governance provider, and IBM is known across the globe."

"The feature I found most valuable in IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is the lineage as it's very powerful and it provides data analytics in terms of where the data lives and where it goes. The interface is also clear, though it could still be sorted out, but the lineage is the most powerful thing in the solution."

"IBM tools always get inherent trust from companies."

"The solution allows us to leverage a concept called Open IGC to create custom assets and data lineages that are not technologies typically supported by IBM via connectors."

"IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is a stable product."

"The valuable feature is that you can connect with multiple types of sources."

More IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog pros

"The data profiling was excellent, as was the ease of generating the dashboards."

"The scorecard will highlight the percentage of good data and ensure the user can feel confident that the data is accurate within predetermined limits."

"Initial setup was straightforward."

"Ability to collect information, monitor user access and to plan storage capacity."

"The product has improved company efficiency because we're able to categorize the need for user access at the folder level across storage enterprise wide."

"Setup is straightforward."

"Data integration is much easier with Information Steward - irrespective of the data sources, integration is very smooth and easy."

"The most valuable features are data quality insight, metadata management, and metadata dictionary."

More SAP Information Steward pros

Cons

"The solution has performance issues when scaling up small sets of information such as assets and data lineage to the ITC."

"What could be improved in IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is its query tool, including its terms, labels, and reports because the query tool isn't user-friendly. This would also be an additional feature or enhancement in the solution that would make it more attractive to users and would make IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog a really good solution."

"A complex solution that requires a lot of coding."

"The scalability has room for improvement."

"Sometimes, if the product is new, getting support is difficult and the team was facing some challenges."

"The simplicity of usage could improve. Perhaps the simplicity of use for end users, not for system integrators, but for the user, the end users."

"Stability is a concern, actually. As a heavy tool, it always has some performance-related issues, and there are some cases that have a constraint on the stability."

"They need to improve asset management."

More IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog cons

"Performance could be improved."

"SAP Information Steward could be improved by offering a cloud version of the product."

"Needs to be more powerful on rules."

"We'd like to see some manipulation techniques included in SAP Information Steward."

"The user experience of metapedia could be improved."

"Granularity could be reduced from an application level to the object level."

"A problem with the solution is that it does not allow us to review the results of Information Stewards for other analogies."

"SAP is a bit pricey, and better tools are available for a lower price."

More SAP Information Steward cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of pricing, I find IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog excessive. It's at the top end of the price range in terms of what you get for your money. It's an expensive product, and contractually, IBM is difficult to deal with. I can't remember the exact cost of IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog, but it could be in the region of three hundred thousand pounds."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is expensive."

"Licensing for IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is per user."

"Smaller-sized organizations may not be able to invest in SAP Information Steward because of the cost."

"A bit pricey, and better tools are available for a lower price."

"I do not know if there were additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees."

"SAP Information Steward is an expensive solution compared to others."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Metadata Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

19%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	7

Comparisons

erwin Data Literacy vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog

Compared 18% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog

Compared 17% of the time

Collibra Platform vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog

Compared 16% of the time

Quest Data Intelligence vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog

Compared 11% of the time

More IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog Competitors

SAP PowerDesigner vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 12% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 12% of the time

SAP Data Quality Management vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Data Quality (EDQ) vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 8% of the time

Syniti Information Management vs SAP Information Steward

Compared 7% of the time

More SAP Information Steward Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog

August 2026

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog report

Download IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Information Steward

July 2026

Download SAP Information Steward product report

Also Known As

IBM Information Governance Catalog

Information Steward, SAP Data Insight

Overview

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog delivers a user-friendly, automated, and scalable data governance solution that enhances data management through features like role management, metadata asset management, and data lineage capabilities.

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog revolutionizes data management by offering comprehensive features designed to simplify and enhance data governance. While it integrates seamlessly with modern data sources and supports data lineage, the platform faces challenges with legacy systems and licensing flexibility. Its user-friendly interface and automation features make it a valuable tool in data analytics and governance, enabling organizations to streamline operations and improve decision-making.

What are the key features of IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies navigation and access to data management tools.
Automation: Streamlines workflows and reduces manual effort in data governance.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs and expands with organizational growth.
Role management: Efficiently manages user roles and permissions.
Metadata asset manager: Organizes and categorizes data for easy access and management.
Data lineage: Tracks data flow across systems for enhanced analytics and compliance.
Multiple data source connectors: Integrates with various data inputs for seamless data management.

What benefits and ROI should be considered when evaluating IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog?

Enhanced decision-making: Provides structured data insights to drive strategic decisions.
Improved data consistency: Ensures uniformity in data naming conventions and source monitoring.
Business term association: Links business jargon with data assets for better understanding.
End-to-end data workflows: Facilitates comprehensive data management from source to analytics.

In industries such as automotive, insurance, and healthcare, IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog aids by addressing data inconsistencies and supporting the creation of business glossaries. It supports end-to-end data workflows, significantly impacting these sectors by enhancing metadata management and glossary maintenance. Through integration with existing tools, it helps enhance data-driven decision-making by defining and enriching critical information.

IBM

SAP Information Steward offers data quality insights, metadata management, and data validation scorecards, ensuring accurate data validation through scorecards and dashboards, making it user-friendly and efficient for businesses seeking clarity and effective data profiling.

SAP Information Steward provides a comprehensive approach to managing data quality and governance. It is designed to simplify deployment and streamline data profiling and cleansing with ease. Businesses leverage its capabilities to create data quality rules and detect issues in source systems, enhancing business clarity and accurate data validation. Centralizing cloud data and offering business-friendly metadata descriptions with Metapedia, it supports better metadata management and data profiling. However, it requires improvements in data export capabilities, integration for data manipulation, data filtering features, and enhanced support responsiveness.

What are the key features of SAP Information Steward?

Data Quality Insight: Provides tools for insightful data quality assessments.
Metadata Management: Allows centralized management of metadata through Metapedia.
Scorecard for Data Validation: Offers intuitive scorecards and dashboards for validating data accuracy.
Data Profiling and Cleansing: Facilitates effective profiling and cleansing processes.
Cloud Data Centralization: Centralizes cloud data for effective management.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Ease of Deployment: Simplifies the integration into existing systems ensuring swift usage.
User-friendly Interface: Enhances usability for efficient operations.
Accurate Data Validation: Improves the accuracy of business data.
Comprehensive Metadata Descriptions: Offers detailed business-friendly descriptions.
Integrated Data Profiling: Enhances the quality and accuracy of data management.

Industries implement SAP Information Steward widely, notably in global enterprises for S/4HANA business processes and historical reporting, prioritizing data profiling, data quality assessments, and business rules for managing customer information and transformations. Its Metapedia component supports data governance initiatives within these businesses.

SAP

Sample Customers

Rabobank, QuadReal Property Group, Jakarta Smart City

American Water, Graphic Packaging International, OSRAM Licht AG, Maxim Integrated

Buyer's Guide

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog vs. SAP Information Steward

August 2026

Free Report: IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog vs. SAP Information Steward

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog vs. SAP Information Steward and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog vs. SAP Information Steward report.

See our list of best Metadata Management vendors.

We monitor all Metadata Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.