IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs Talend Data Management Platform comparison

"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."

"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."

"It is a stable solution."

"We can develop our own code if we do not see the functionality we need."

"Talend Studio has the ability to connect to almost anything to integrate data from files, databases, web services, etc."

"They're very competitive in terms of performance, which is a good selling point. It has very rich features. It provides a very rich feature set in the application."

"The most valuable feature is the data loading and scripting language"

"Overall, the management and running environment are very stable, and I would rate it an eight out of ten."

"The process of upgrading the software is quite easy."

"The tool was mainly used for ETL processes to apply governance rules on data."

"The solution is connected to various phones. It retrieves the configuration from the system."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."

"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."

"The pricing can be improved."

"We'd like to see more connectors it the future."

"The documentation from version to version could be more accurate."

"I'd be interested in seeing the running of Python programs and transformations from within the studio itself."

"Including either XML or JSON in the next release would definitely be a good transformation. I'm not sure if Talend has that feature, but it's one of those requirements that we are working around and have to do some parsing of XML so this could make it easier."

"I think they should drive toward AI and machine learning. They could include a machine-learning algorithm for the deduplication."

"Once you get past the basic tools, it gets pretty complicated."

"The product must enhance the data quality."

"I would like to sync a project and do an upload from that current version, and then from GitLab, be able to download the latest one."

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The pricing is a little higher than what I had expected, but it's comparable with I-PASS competitors."

"The price of the Talend Data Management Platform is reasonable. The other competing solutions are priced high. Gartner Magic Quadrant identified other solutions, such as Informatica, that are far more expensive."

"License renewal is on a yearly basis."

"The price is on a per-user basis. It's a little more expensive than other tools. There aren't any additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"The licensing cost is about 40,000 Euros a year."

"The solution's pricing is very reasonable and half the cost of Informatica."

"The tool is cheap."