IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs Talend Data Management Platform comparison

"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."

"It is a stable solution."

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."

"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."

"Talend Studio has the ability to connect to almost anything to integrate data from files, databases, web services, etc."

"We can develop our own code if we do not see the functionality we need."

"The features that I like the most are the simplicity of the interface, and the ability to quickly develop with a predefined component."

"The process of upgrading the software is quite easy."

"The basic tools are easy to pick up and understand."

"The most valuable features of the Talend Data Management Platform are the components."

"They're very competitive in terms of performance, which is a good selling point. It has very rich features. It provides a very rich feature set in the application."

"The most valuable feature is integration."

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."

"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."

"The pricing can be improved."

"I'd be interested in seeing the running of Python programs and transformations from within the studio itself."

"The documentation from version to version could be more accurate."

"They lack in memory capacity."

"I would like to sync a project and do an upload from that current version, and then from GitLab, be able to download the latest one."

"The biggest challenge with Talend was its performance."

"Performance and speed could be improved."

"I wonder if, at the same price, the API component could be added, which would be beneficial."

"The stability is good, but the performance is slower when I work on a huge amount of data."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."

"The price of the Talend Data Management Platform is reasonable. The other competing solutions are priced high. Gartner Magic Quadrant identified other solutions, such as Informatica, that are far more expensive."

"The solution's pricing is very reasonable and half the cost of Informatica."

"The pricing is a little higher than what I had expected, but it's comparable with I-PASS competitors."

"The licensing cost is about 40,000 Euros a year."

"License renewal is on a yearly basis."

"The price is on a per-user basis. It's a little more expensive than other tools. There aren't any additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"The tool is cheap."