We performed a comparison between IBM API Connect and webMethods.io based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."I have found the API Management to be most valuable."
"API Connect is a very good platform for the development of APIs."
"It is a complete all-in-one solution."
"It allows enterprises to expose some of their tech to outside stakeholders."
"One of the most valuable features of this solution is that it protects our backend system. We are exposing services to external parties and using this solution to protect the backend system, and to have a navigation in between."
"What's best about IBM API Connect is the excellent administration. The development tool that builds the API is also very simple, and user-friendly, and it doesn't consume too much time. Another valuable feature in IBM API Connect is its good reporting feature, particularly for operations, but the most valuable feature of the solution for the customer is security. IBM API Connect provides a DMZ and a security gateway between the external and internal environment, so you can publish your API safely. IBM API Connect can also integrate with any tool or middleware that works on open standards without the need for development or coding, so integration with the solution is easier."
"Its speed and performance are valuable."
"The product gathers data to measure API performance."
"EDI is robust and integration with SAP is good."
"The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation."
"There are some performance issues and issues related to asynchronous APIs."
"It is expensive within this class of products."
"The implementation process could benefit from improvements, as it may take some time to become accustomed to the deployment."
"We would have more capability to interact with the catalog and inventories, so a more DevOps-friendly solution is needed."
"It needs to be less taxing on compute resources."
"The integration of an API gateway that implements the sidecar pattern, which can be deployed in cloud applications, and expose the microservices directly in each pod, this can be more decentralized components."
"It would be nice to have a SaaS solution that can be deployed into the cloud."
"The installation was difficult with the IBM toolkit."
"webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience."
"Scalability and connectors to different cloud applications is lacking."
IBM API Connect is ranked 7th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 73 reviews while webMethods.io is ranked 18th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 2 reviews. IBM API Connect is rated 8.0, while webMethods.io is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM API Connect writes "Good speed and performance, but it's based on a bit dated architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io writes "Comes with strong and powerful BPM ". IBM API Connect is most compared with Apigee, IBM DataPower Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Amazon API Gateway, whereas webMethods.io is most compared with webMethods Integration Server.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
