IBM API Connect vs TIBCO Cloud Integration comparison

IBM and TIBCO are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. IBM is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while TIBCO is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 2.8% mindshare in PaaS, compared to TIBCO’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

IBM API Connect

Read 76 IBM API Connect reviews

367 Views
299 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

TIBCO Cloud Integration

Read 3 TIBCO Cloud Integration reviews

135 Views
110 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

IBM API Connect

TIBCO Cloud Integration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

IBM API Connect and TIBCO Cloud Integration are two prominent API management and integration platforms. IBM API Connect holds the edge due to its comprehensive security measures.

Features: IBM API Connect offers robust security, detailed analytics, and extensive API lifecycle management. TIBCO Cloud Integration is known for its simplicity, strong workflow automation, and a broad range of connectors.

Room for Improvement: IBM API Connect could reduce complexity and enhance integration with other tools. TIBCO Cloud Integration needs better error handling and more advanced monitoring tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM API Connect's deployment is more complex, requiring significant initial setup, but customer service is responsive and supportive. TIBCO Cloud Integration offers quick deployment and straightforward setup, although customer support could be more robust.

Pricing and ROI: IBM API Connect has higher setup costs but provides significant long-term ROI due to extensive features and reliability. TIBCO Cloud Integration offers competitive pricing with quicker ROI due to easier deployment and lower initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM API Connect vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM API Connect vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM API Connect

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Management (5th)

TIBCO Cloud Integration

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of IBM API Connect is 2.8%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO Cloud Integration is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

KavitaChavan

Associate Manager at Baariz

Quite flexible and provides excellent performance for API gateway

The only disadvantage I can see is that it requires heavy hardware support, which can be considered quite expensive. In terms of new functionality, I think the analytics can be improved in V10. The analytics feature was better in the older version, 2.18. But in V10, it's not as flexible. When exporting analytics as KSP or JSON, it's not well formatted. They can work on enhancing the analytics part. Additionally, they can focus on reducing the hardware cost.

Read full review

NarendraThota

Vice President of Technology Services at SAge IT inc

A product that is easy to install and offers good stability to users

The API part of the solution is an area in the solution where improvements are made since I see that TIBCO is currently trying to revamp its tool by focusing more on redesigning it. There was a tool called Mashery, which is an API management tool that was acquired by TIBCO. TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex. I think in the UK, one of the major telecom providers for whom I had done the infrastructure setup uses TIBCO Cloud Integration. Basically, TIBCO Cloud Integration is a bit difficult to install and manage the platform, but I feel there are improvements in the tool's latest version, especially on the API management side. Instead of moving to the higher version and converting the older version of TIBCO Cloud Integration or the legacy platform covered under TIBCO, they still use it because the architecture is completely different, and the components that the product has are completely different from what the new version of the product offers, making it one of the major reasons why TIBCO is coming up with a new version of the product that will be released in the upcoming year. The legacy platform of TIBCO will run on the cloud directly. TIBCO plans to develop a unified tool that is supported on the cloud and in an on-premises environment.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IBM API Connect is a reliable and scalable solution."

"The most valuable feature of IBM API Connect is the security of the protocol."

"The support is good and active. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."

"The product gathers data to measure API performance."

"Scalable and stable API platform for creating and managing APIs."

"Its speed and performance are valuable."

"The capabilities are very good."

"This is a very easy to use solution."

More IBM API Connect pros

"I am really impressed by TIBCO's integration of any level of complexity."

"I like that it is a very good integration tool with many other things. TIBCO is very good for cloud integration"

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

Cons

"It should be cheaper."

"The monetization of the API could be improved. The pricing for the consumer is also very important to improve this solution."

"It is expensive within this class of products."

"The integration of cloud-based services is where we're looking for improvement in this platform."

"The developmental process is not quite user-friendly."

"Components, like caching, should be implemented as policies, not requiring dependency on an external solution."

"In the next version, I don't know if they've already been included it or not, but the designer and all the tools should be on the cloud. I don't want any external installation or local installation."

"It would be nice to have a SaaS solution that can be deployed into the cloud."

More IBM API Connect cons

"TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex."

"Integrations could be better. Although integration is good, we have faced some block issues."

"The deployment was rather complicated."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"API Connect's license cost could be a little lower. But, unfortunately, there aren't many open-source API gateways. Ideally, some new developers could come up with a minimum-functionality open-source solution."

"It is a pretty expensive tool."

"Pricing for IBM API Connect varies, e.g. it could be subscription-based. Deploying it on private cloud also means you have to own most of the software licensing."

"API Connect is expensive - I'd rate their pricing five out of ten."

"It would be a good idea to bring down the pricing by at least 20 to 30 percent."

"It is quite an expensive product."

"IBM API Connect could be cheaper."

"The price of the solution is very expensive, it can turn many customers away."

More IBM API Connect pricing and cost advice

"We don't pay for a license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

24%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

13%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Consumer Goods Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM API Connect?

Publishers can easily identify, create, and publish APIs on the developer portal, defining plans, packages, and potentially billing rules.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM API Connect?

Price depends on many factors like size of the deal, competitive factors, timing, customer profile or where the pricing for API Calls is very competitive comparing to any of the leader players.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM API Connect?

The only downside where improvements are needed is probably on the licensing side. Scalability is an issue with IBM API Connect, making it an area where improvements are required.

See all answers

What do you like most about TIBCO Cloud Integration?

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TIBCO Cloud Integration?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TIBCO Cloud Integration?

I mainly use TIBCO Cloud Integration for iPaaS platforms, SaaS connectors, and SaaS connectivity that you have. The solution can be deployed on the cloud and on an on-premises model, so you can go ...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM API Connect

Compared 25% of the time

Apigee vs IBM API Connect

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Azure API Management vs IBM API Connect

Compared 15% of the time

Amazon API Gateway vs IBM API Connect

Compared 7% of the time

Kong Gateway Enterprise vs IBM API Connect

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM API Connect Competitors

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 59% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs TIBCO Cloud Integration

Compared 41% of the time

More TIBCO Cloud Integration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM API Connect

April 2025

Download IBM API Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

April 2025

Download TIBCO Cloud Integration product report

Overview

IBM API Connect facilitates API management and integration in the financial sector. Companies use it to expose, secure, and manage APIs for banking, insurance, and fintech, deploying it on-premises, in the cloud, or as a hybrid solution.

IBM API Connect focuses on creating and monetizing APIs while enabling seamless transactions and integration with third-party services. It is vital for compliance with regulations and enhances external communication among institutions. With deployment options suitable for different environments, it supports centralized gateway management, robust security features, and comprehensive API lifecycle management. Users benefit from powerful analytics, user-friendly interfaces, and high performance with capabilities in message transformation and efficient monitoring.

What are the most important features?

Centralized Gateway: Manages all APIs through a single entry point.
Robust Security: Ensures API protection with advanced security measures.
Comprehensive API Lifecycle Management: Covers creation, deployment, and retirement of APIs.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies API creation and management tasks.
Powerful Analytics: Provides insights into API usage and performance.
Seamless Integration: Connects easily with third-party services and internal systems.
Flexible Deployment Options: Supports on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.
High Performance: Optimizes API performance and reduces latency.
Message Transformation: Manipulates and formats messages between different systems.
Visualization Tools: Enables clear and detailed views of API usage statistics.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

API Monetization: Generates additional revenue streams from APIs.
Enhanced Compliance: Ensures adherence to industry regulations and standards.
Improved External Communication: Facilitates integration and communication among financial institutions.
Technical Support: Benefit from reliable customer support and easy configuration.
Deployment Flexibility: Choose from on-premises, cloud, or hybrid options.

IBM API Connect is extensively implemented in the financial sector, enabling banking, insurance, and fintech services to manage APIs efficiently. Companies use it to ensure secure transactions, integration with third-party services, and compliance with regulatory standards. Its deployment flexibility accommodates different infrastructure needs, making it suitable for a wide range of financial applications.

IBM

TIBCO Cloud Integration, built on open-source technologies, can connect cloud, on-premises, and IoT edge applications. It has a drag-and-drop and API-led design approach and a deploy-anywhere model.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

Heineken, Tine, Finologee, Axis Bank

NASA, T-Mobile, EagleView, Air France KLM, Caesars Entertainment

Buyer's Guide

IBM API Connect vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration

April 2025

Free Report: IBM API Connect vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM API Connect vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM API Connect vs. TIBCO Cloud Integration report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.