We performed a comparison between Hubble and Informatica PowerCenter based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tableau, Qlik, Splunk and others in Data Visualization."The most valuable features are both its budgeting and forecasting."
"It's very easy to use it to develop mappings and workflows."
"It is an excellent ETL tool."
"It's a complete package, which is why we use this solution."
"Informatica PowerCenter is very good for integrating a huge amount of data in a very short duration, such as a minute. It is also very easy to use. After you provide the source and the target, mappings are automatically done, which makes it easy to use for the development team."
"Good interface, reasonable documentation."
"The reliability of the product and the way of orchestration of different services is valuable to us."
"It has a Data Catalog that uses the Model repository."
"It has very good monitoring and process monitoring."
"We have been advised by the owners that the budgeting tool is no longer going to be supported with future development, so my recommendation would be for them to continue to invest in development. Otherwise, at some point we will have to migrate to another technology."
"Support could be better."
"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, considering the fact that the present licensing charges of the tool are expensive."
"I would like to see an improvement in the digital adoption."
"The solution's commercial cost is very high. Other open-source tools can do the tool's functions for free. The world is moving to the cloud, but the solution hasn't updated its drivers. I presume that its downfall will start soon. The tool is trying to cross-sell or upsell without helping customers derive benefits from the existing products. They have multiple tools and licenses. It is better to bring the smaller tools in one umbrella."
"Requires an established data center because there is no option for software as a service."
"Informatica PowerCenter could improve by having a single interface because half of the system is still in the legacy interface and many other elements are moved to the developer client. It would be good if there was a single interface for the end user and developers."
"Some of the conversions are done inside the product. We use work tables that are created by the engine itself, but the names of the work tables are very long, and they don't have any meaning, which makes it a bit difficult to understand and follow exactly what is happening inside."
"As a connector to big data, it is not well developed. We've had problems connecting Informatica with Hadoop. The functionality to connect Informatica with Hadoop, for me it's not good."
Earn 20 points
Hubble is ranked 28th in Data Visualization while Informatica PowerCenter is ranked 5th in Data Visualization with 78 reviews. Hubble is rated 8.4, while Informatica PowerCenter is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Hubble writes "Excellent for budgeting and forecasting, but long-term it will no longer be developed or supported". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica PowerCenter writes "Stable, provides good support, and integrating it with other systems is very fast, but its pricing is expensive". Hubble is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, Splunk Enterprise Security and Genpact Cora SeQuence, whereas Informatica PowerCenter is most compared with Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Azure Data Factory, SSIS, Databricks and AWS Glue.
See our list of best Data Visualization vendors.
We monitor all Data Visualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.