HPE Zerto Software vs Precisely Assure QuickEDD comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Precisely are both solutions in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.0, while Precisely is ranked #31. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 5.9% mindshare in DRS, compared to Precisely’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Precisely users who would recommend it.

HPE Zerto Software

Read 357 HPE Zerto Software reviews

22,247 Views
10,901 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Read 2 Precisely Assure QuickEDD reviews

1,309 Views
1,230 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE Zerto Software

Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

HPE Zerto Software and Precisely Assure QuickEDD are competitors in disaster recovery and data management solutions. HPE Zerto Software holds a pricing and support advantage, appealing to some organizations.

Features: HPE Zerto Software offers continuous data protection, data recovery, and robust disaster recovery capabilities. Precisely Assure QuickEDD focuses on data integrity, high availability, and system performance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Zerto Software provides a straightforward deployment and reliable customer support, enabling quick utilization of its solutions. Precisely Assure QuickEDD has a complex deployment process, mitigated by attentive customer service catering to specific needs.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Zerto Software is a cost-effective option with substantial ROI through efficient resource utilization. Precisely Assure QuickEDD has higher setup costs but offers long-term value and significant ROI in data management and security.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Zerto Software vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Zerto Software

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

1st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

357

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (1st), Cloud Backup (2nd), Autonomous Operational Resilience (1st)

Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Ranking in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

31st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Disaster Recovery (DR) Software category, the mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 5.9%, down from 10.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Precisely Assure QuickEDD is 1.6%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE Zerto Software	5.9%
Precisely Assure QuickEDD	1.6%
Other	92.5%

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2802231

Dev Ops Engineer at a media company with 201-500 employees

Near-zero downtime has protected critical workloads and now simplifies hybrid cloud recovery

The best features of HPE Zerto Software are mainly very sophisticated and relevant to the current market. The data protection CDP part has real-time replication, unlike other solutions that have snapshot backups. We can set it up hourly, making it ideal for use with workloads. Another attraction is the near-zero RTO, with automated failover within minutes and one-click failover and failback. Currently, we are using a hybrid cloud solution, and HPE Zerto Software supports multi-cloud environments, making it easy to migrate between on-premises and cloud. Regarding the impact of HPE Zerto Software on our RTOs, we have near-zero RTO, meaning the system must be back online within thirty minutes if we measure the time. It is very quick to recover services. With HPE Zerto Software's near-synchronous replication, we have some CDP protection, so we typically write interceptions along with some asynchronous replication. There is almost real-time replication available.

Read full review

reviewer2325741

Director of Information Technology at a construction company with 1-10 employees

Trustworthy and provides good availability

Our administrator found the solution easy to use, but once that administrator left, it felt very overwhelming to the individual who took it over. It could be more of a knowledge transfer situation that didn't happen, but we didn't know if it was easy to use. Precisely Assure QuickEDD is deployed on the cloud in our organization. The implementation of QLED helped us with our recovery time objective and was a seamless transition. In order to utilize the product to its fullest potential, users should be knowledgeable of what it offers. They should also form a relationship with the person who is their representative. Overall, I rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I've been fortunate enough not to need to rely on Zerto in an actual disaster, but we do testing every year. Sometimes, it's multiple times annually or at the year's end. It takes the recovery workflow, which would normally take a lot of planning, and reduces that to just a few minutes."

"The most valuable feature is the point in time recovery. This allows us to recover at any point in time, up to a minute or so."

"The customer service and support are very good. Every time we have problems, they're ready to help us."

"The other thing that is impressive is that you really can bring up a virtual machine almost immediately."

"In situations of failback or moving workloads, it saves us hours. If I were to have to move a four or five terabyte machine using something like VMware's virtual copy it has to install on the machine and copy the data over. Then it has to shut the machine down and do a final copy, which means there's a lot of downtime while it's doing the final copy."

"What I appreciate about Zerto is that it's set and forget. You set it, and it just works."

"The most valuable features in Zerto are ease of use number one and the support that has come from the Zerto team."

"We have used Zerto to recover from ransomware three times and between the attacks we have recovered over 2 million files, never paid a ransom, and our users were only affected for just under two hours."

More HPE Zerto Software pros

"The most valuable feature of Precisely Assure QuickEDD is the backup system."

"Synchronous applications are valuable."

"Its initial setup is fine; it is straightforward and easy."

Cons

"When we migrated to new virtual infrastructure, we had to set up Zerto all over again. And that took a long time. It would be nice if Zerto had some sort of migration tool where you could migrate all of your virtual machines to a new infrastructure without having to set up Zerto all over again."

"The alerting doesn't quite give you the information about what exactly is going on when an issue comes up. We do get alerts inside of our vCenter, but it doesn't quite give you accurate information inside the plugin to be able to tell us what's going on without having to go into the actual Zerto application and figuring out what's causing the issue."

"Its price is a little bit on the higher side."

"I would like to see them continuously improve Zerto's automated functions, such as putting hosts in maintenance mode within vSphere and not having to worry as much about how Zerto is going to react... Sometimes, Zerto almost holds the vSphere environment hostage when it comes to taking certain actions. You really need to be cognizant about what you're about to do. They should further automate that and increase Zerto's ability to handle things like that in a very slick, automated way, without intervention."

"Recently, they started forcing everybody to use a Linux-based appliance for their z/VMs. That appliance has been extremely touchy and, in some cases, problematic."

"Some of the cloud instructions around VNets and peering of networks could be clearer with some best-case examples."

"In the future, the tool's user interface needs to be refreshed since it seems to be becoming somewhat antiquated."

"I definitely would like to see the continuation of the migration capability to Hyper-V included in the next release of HPE Zerto Software, as well as adding migration capabilities to other hypervisors, such as Nutanix Acropolis."

More HPE Zerto Software cons

"There should be more interactive dashboards."

"It is expensive. The cost varies based on your requirements."

"Our administrator found the solution easy to use, but once that administrator left, it felt very overwhelming to the individual who took it over."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When they changed their licensing model, pricing might have gotten a little more expensive for some use cases, but it has been pretty straightforward."

"Zerto's pricing structure could be more competitive to better suit the needs of a wider range of businesses."

"Zerto is fairly expensive, but worth it."

"It was pretty appropriate. It was not too cheap, not too expensive. It was just about right."

"It is not the cheapest option on the market, but it offers a number of features that make it a good value for businesses that need a comprehensive disaster recovery plan."

"Zerto is affordable."

"Its price is reasonable. I have not worked with other tools, but as compared to its competitors such as VMware, its price is lower. So, in my opinion, its price is good."

"We paid a big investment upfront with renewal fees each year."

More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice

"It is expensive. The cost varies based on your requirements. If you want to manage it, there is an extra cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	93
Midsize Enterprise	93
Large Enterprise	204

No data available

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zerto?

I believe HPE Zerto Software can be improved by providing more clarity on roadmap features coming.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 9% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 4% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 3% of the time

More HPE Zerto Software Competitors

Precisely Assure MIMIX vs Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Compared 16% of the time

Vision Solutions Double-Take vs Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Compared 9% of the time

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Compared 5% of the time

BDRShield vs Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Compared 5% of the time

Quorum OnQ vs Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Compared 4% of the time

More Precisely Assure QuickEDD Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software

June 2026

Download HPE Zerto Software product report

Buyer's Guide

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software

June 2026

Download Precisely Assure QuickEDD product report

Also Known As

Zerto Virtual Replication

Syncsort Assure QuickEDD, Syncsort Quick-EDD/HA, Quick-EDD/HA

Overview

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Precisely Assure QuickEDD is an advanced data management tool designed for businesses requiring robust and efficient data quality solutions. It ensures seamless integration and real-time data accuracy, facilitating informed decision-making.

Tailored for enterprises, Precisely Assure QuickEDD offers comprehensive features that enhance data management through quick error detection, data validation, and correction capabilities. This tool is integral for reducing data discrepancies and improving data quality across business operations. QuickEDD's adaptability streamlines complex data processes, making it an essential asset for companies focusing on data integrity and accuracy.

What are the most important features of Precisely Assure QuickEDD?

Error Detection: Quickly identifies and alerts users to discrepancies in data.
Data Validation: Ensures data integrity through rigorous validation checks.
Real-Time Processing: Provides immediate feedback and updates, enhancing decision-making.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with existing systems for a smooth workflow.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Data Accuracy: Enhances decision-making with reliable data.
Reduced Error Rates: Saves time and resources by minimizing data errors.
Increased Efficiency: Streamlines data processes, boosting operational productivity.
Scalability: Supports business growth by accommodating increasing data volumes.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Precisely Assure QuickEDD is implemented to bolster data accuracy and security. Financial institutions use it to ensure compliance and mitigate risks, while healthcare organizations rely on it for maintaining patient data integrity. This versatility across sectors highlights its contribution to achieving operational excellence.

Precisely

Sample Customers

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Toyota Material Handling Australia, Westpac Pacific Banking, Symphony Health, Wimbledon, OCBC Bank

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD

June 2026

Free Report: HPE Zerto Software vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Zerto Software vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Zerto Software vs. Precisely Assure QuickEDD report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.