HPE StoreVirtual vs Red Hat Gluster Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
979 views|487 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Red Hat Logo
958 views|599 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE StoreVirtual and Red Hat Gluster Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS).
To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined Storage (SDS) Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Data is stored in two different places, leveraging more security and availability. Therefore, network problems are having less affect on iSCSI.""he interface and the installation makes it easy as it's all in one piece of hardware and it doesn't need to be connected to anything else.""Simplicity of not having to buy FC or FCoE SAN. Instead, we buy servers with their own storage.""The initial setup is straightforward, not a complex procedure.""A very flexible solution.""The seamlessness behind the scenes of block management.""The solution is quite stable. We haven't had any issues with glitches or bugs.""I guess on the top of the list is certainly ease of use."

More HPE StoreVirtual Pros →

"It's very easy to upgrade storage.""The price tag is good compared to the amount of data and high availability provided.""The technical support team is excellent."

More Red Hat Gluster Storage Pros →

Cons
"The solution needs to ensure it is on par with the industry in terms of availability of features and various other options.""Product looks like it is in the end of development.""f you're doing the 10Gb adapters, SFPs don't come with it, but it doesn't say that. It might say that somewhere else, but it's not clear.""The penalty for the availability is performance. So, you have to balance or choose between the availability and the performance.""It is a costly solution.""The management aspect of the solution needs to be improved in order to make the product stronger.""The initial setup could be simplified to make it easier for new users.""Configuration of application integrated snapshots for VMware is convoluted and it did not work immediately."

More HPE StoreVirtual Cons →

"The performance of the solution must be improved.""The system should be more intuitive and easier to manage.""The user interface could be simplified."

More Red Hat Gluster Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The prices are OK, so we don't have much difficulty selling HPE in Brazil."
  • "One of the key features about it is that when you buy either a VSA license or a StoreVirtual appliance, all your software's included."
  • "If you buy a five-year license, not only does the technical support expire after five years, but you also lose the ability to change and expand the VSA, and the systems won't go down."
  • "Licensing is not exactly straightforward, but not the worst I have ever seen."
  • "For our organization, I believe the cost is 16,000 Euros for a three-year license. It costs a bit more to do the maintenance on our servers as well. It's also on an HP ProLiant server and an organization will need to do the maintenance there also. I believe the price for that is around 2000 Euros a year."
  • "It costs less than $10,000 for one machine. If it costs more than 15% higher than this, then the customer may change to another solution."
  • More HPE StoreVirtual Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "If you need cheap storage, but still need high availability, it's a good product to look at."
  • More Red Hat Gluster Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:According to HPE, they say that they will stop making updates from maybe next year or something The GUI is a bit old-fashioned. It should be updated. We need the solution to offer support for newer… more »
    Top Answer:We have several customers and we have StoreVirtual on several StoreVirtual deployments.
    Top Answer:The performance of the solution must be improved.
    Top Answer:The solution is used in banks and financial institutions. Customers use the replicated configuration for high availability. They either use the native Gluster client or configure it with NFS… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    979
    Comparisons
    487
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    425
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    958
    Comparisons
    599
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    344
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HPE StoreVirtual, HPE VSA
    Red Hat Gluster, Red Hat Storage Server
    Learn More
    Overview

    HPE StoreVirtual storage ensures that organisations can optimise the benefits of server virtualisation with cost-effective high availability and disaster recovery. The iSCSI-based, scale-out storage platform is easy to manage and change – meeting ongoing business demands without creating IT bottlenecks or application downtime. Overcoming the cost and management limitations of traditional storage area networks (SANs), HPE StoreVirtual nodes use storage clustering to form a single pool of resources that enable organisations to buy only what they need today, scaling non-disruptively to meet requirements in the future.

    Red Hat Gluster Storage (formerly known as Red Hat Storage Server) is a software-defined storage (SDS) platform designed to handle the requirements of traditional file storage—high-capacity tasks like backup and archival as well as high-performance tasks of analytics and virtualization. But unlike traditional storage systems, Red Hat Gluster Storage isn’t rigid and expensive. It easily scales across bare metal, virtual, container, and cloud deployments.

    Sample Customers
    NBrIX, WIND Telecom, Netrics
    NTT Plala, McMaster University, University of Basque Country, Goodtech ASA, Cox Automotive, Raidió Teilifís Éireann (RTÉ), SaskTel, Glashart Media, Casio
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company12%
    Import And Exporter8%
    Retailer8%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Government10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined Storage (SDS)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: April 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HPE StoreVirtual is ranked 13th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 50 reviews while Red Hat Gluster Storage is ranked 12th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 3 reviews. HPE StoreVirtual is rated 8.2, while Red Hat Gluster Storage is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of HPE StoreVirtual writes "Using this platform, we were able to provide virtual desktops (VDI) to our end users across WAN, to help alleviate some of the problems that we’ve had with bandwidth". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Gluster Storage writes "A scalable and easy-to-implement solution that has an excellent technical support team". HPE StoreVirtual is most compared with VMware vSAN, HPE SimpliVity, Red Hat Ceph Storage, StarWind Virtual Tape Library and StorMagic SvSAN, whereas Red Hat Gluster Storage is most compared with VMware vSAN, Red Hat Ceph Storage, IBM Spectrum Scale, LizardFS and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP.

    See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.

    We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.