IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

HPE Proliant ML vs IBM System X comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
937 views|495 comparisons
IBM Logo
285 views|180 comparisons
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The ML series is cheaper than other products, and everything is included with the standard licensing fees."
  • "The price of HPE Proliant ML is very good. If we are partners, we have courses to attend and exams to do, but we buy more or less at the same price as everybody else. We have a small discount which should be increased."
  • More HPE Proliant ML Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Tower Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    621,327 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is the technical support, which is both good and available easily.
    Top Answer:The ML series is cheaper than other products, and everything is included with the standard licensing fees.
    Top Answer:I think that the RAID support can be improved because it is not very effective compared to the DL series. Generally, scalability can be improved. I would like to see a centralized monitoring system… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    1st
    out of 4 in Tower Servers
    Views
    937
    Comparisons
    495
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    453
    Rating
    8.0
    4th
    out of 4 in Tower Servers
    Views
    285
    Comparisons
    180
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HP Proliant ML
    Learn More
    Overview
    HP ProLiant ML expandable tower servers are ideal for remote and branch offices in need of low-risk networking, file-and-print and shared Internet access solutions, and provide maximum internal storage and I/O flexibility. Many small to medium-sized businesses rely on HP ProLiant ML expandable tower servers for the highest level of efficiency, insight and control. HP expandable servers deliver decades of engineering and integration experience designed to speed the implementation of new business computing technology.
    The IBM System x iDataPlex dx360 M4 is a half-depth, dual-socket server designed for data centers that require high performance, yet are constrained on floor space, power, and cooling infrastructure. The dx360 M4 is equipped with the latest Intel Xeon E5-2600 Series processors and is ideal for clients that need a dense, flexible solution with low total cost of ownership.
    Offer
    Learn more about HPE Proliant ML
    Learn more about IBM System X
    Sample Customers
    Kenya Ports Authority, RAK Ceramics, Continental Resources
    SEW-EURODRIVE, Intrinsec, Fluent Trade Technologies, Oxford Networks, Tracewell Systems
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider31%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Government11%
    Educational Organization10%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise56%
    No Data Available

    HPE Proliant ML is ranked 1st in Tower Servers with 2 reviews while IBM System X is ranked 4th in Tower Servers. HPE Proliant ML is rated 8.0, while IBM System X is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of HPE Proliant ML writes "Easy to set up and use, with technical support that is both good and readily available". On the other hand, HPE Proliant ML is most compared with Dell PowerEdge T and Lenovo ThinkSystem Tower Servers, whereas IBM System X is most compared with Lenovo ThinkSystem Tower Servers and Dell PowerEdge T.

    See our list of best Tower Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Tower Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.