HPE BladeSystem vs Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Lenovo are both solutions in the Blade Servers category. Additionally, 95% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Lenovo users who would recommend it.

HPE BladeSystem

Read 140 HPE BladeSystem reviews

6,717 Views
6,650 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]

Read 11 Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] reviews

88% willing to recommend

HPE BladeSystem

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE BladeSystem and Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco and others in Blade Servers.

To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 916,582 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE BladeSystem

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

140

Ranking in other categories

Blade Servers (3rd)

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

TarunAudichey

CTO at Miraj

Centralized modular platform has improved data center management and supports mission-critical workloads

The main area for improvement I see is the training process. When you use anything, how easily it is to manage is very important in hyper-converged solutions. If you compare it with VMware, it is very familiar. HPE Converged, however, is very large to understand for a new person. I am talking about training and management perspective, and user management. A system integrator and any system engineer who will operate and manage the system should find it easy to understand any configuration part and understanding part, which is currently a little bit tough. In Virtual Connect, we need some improvement. If we are going to move to hybrid, we need to easily move VM transactions from on-premises to cloud. We require a good, more easy process for day-to-day activities. Performance-wise, HPE BladeSystem is good regarding its ability to support mission-critical applications. However, reliability is all dependent on the core and memories, which will centrally control the entire blade and hyper-converged. We require more reliable things because if something goes down in the controller and center control, it is very tough to manage. We require a centralized image that will be replicated to any other device immediately, and all configurations and everything will come as soon as possible.

Read full review

it_user477012

Support Engineer-Enterprise System at a tech services company

Easy to deploy and produces better performance with less maintenance

We have separate compute module know as FSM for management Easy to deploy with better performance and less maintenance. Integrated DVD/CD ROM. Five years. No issues to date. It is every important that you should be very clear with your future plans. We have had no scalability issues to date.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"HPE BladeSystem provides good commuting performance."

"It's a good product, it's reliable, the performance is good."

"The density of the BladeSystem, that we can keep adding blades as we need more VMs."

"I believe they are ahead of the other vendors (IBM, Dell and Cisco)."

"Modularity is a key feature that provides energy saving ."

"When it comes to the BladeSystem, what we love about it most is being able to actually manage it using OneView, one feature that allows us to fully manage all of our infrastructure using just one application."

"BladeSystem was a huge improvement over rack. We gained an awful lot of productivity when we went to BladeSystem, because we can set up so much infrastructure in one swipe."

"When comparing the HPE ProLiant DL Servers to the HPE BladeSystem, the HPE BladeSystems are compact and need less space for installation, can provide the same computing as the HPE ProLiant DL Servers in the same unit, and are a lot easier to manage."

More HPE BladeSystem pros

"Central management of all blade servers and performance: It helps us to access blade servers remotely even at boot time, as well, when we can access the BIOS setup remotely."

"Overall, the product has great value for money."

"The servers have enabled us to run critical applications, backup of critical data, and storage systems on the same products without downtime issues that could otherwise be caused by hardware or software issues."

"The form factor is good for medium-level application hosting and does not take up too much space in the DC."

"We replaced five 42U server racks with two IBM S Series Blade Center chassis."

"Easy to deploy with better performance and less maintenance."

"The technical support is very good."

"Before this solution, we used rack mount servers, but this solution saves physical spaces and increases reliability."

More Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] pros

Cons

"The setup process is complex."

"The only con I can think of with using HP ProLiant is the limited parts of the old servers."

"Alerting management could be better."

"HPE BladeSystem can improve by providing the latest generation processor engine, such as the I-Flex processor."

"For me, the product is okay, but I would probably suggest improvement in their services or technical support. They need to work harder in the preventative maintenance of the system. They need to improve in terms of how quickly can we get attention and how quickly problems are resolved. Its price could also be lower."

"For me, the product is okay, but I would probably suggest improvement in their services or technical support."

"One of the issues we have is firmware on virtual connects; there's a little bit of overlap on the timing that, if you're not careful, can cause a short outage for the BladeSystem."

"There could be more management capability to work with integrations."

More HPE BladeSystem cons

"Firmware updates are troublesome and difficult."

"Because this is an old IBM blade chassis model and servers, we faced a couple of issues during VMware implementation."

"Performance is good, but on heavily non-linear workloads, they tend to have some issues."

"It needs better management software."

"The storage part of this product needs to be improved."

"If we talk about scalability, it is quite expensive, especially when you need to buy more blades."

"It was quite unfortunate that I lost data while using this blade server."

"Need some level of technical knowledge to configure it."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Regarding the cost, HPE BladeSystem is not cheap. The solution and its support are costly, and there are challenges with renewal and pricing, especially in Nigeria, due to the dollar rate and FX issues. However, it is reliable. I don't have specific figures for licensing costs, as the procurement and finance departments handle them."

"BladeSystem is a little bit cheaper."

"There is a one-time purchase for the HPE BladeSystem."

"The licenses for HPE BladeSystem are perpetual."

"it would make everyone happy if the solution were less expensive."

"Add OneView and ILO advanced to the base product. Don’t adjust the price, but just include them."

"The HPE BladeSystem is an expensive solution."

"The licensing is on an annual basis."

More HPE BladeSystem pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

916,582 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

12%

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	29
Midsize Enterprise	40
Large Enterprise	104

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

How would you choose between HPE's Bladesystem and Synergy?

For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE BladeSystem?

With around 19 years of exposure in working with various servers, including HPE, I encounter challenges in identifying reasonable prices during the setup cost and licensing process, especially for ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE BladeSystem?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

HPE Synergy vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco UCS B-Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 11% of the time

Dell PowerEdge MX- Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 8% of the time

Intel MFSYS25 vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 8% of the time

Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series vs HPE BladeSystem

Compared 6% of the time

More HPE BladeSystem Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE BladeSystem

October 2026

Download HPE BladeSystem product report

Buyer's Guide

Blade Servers

September 2026

Download Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] product report

Also Known As

HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem

Blade Servers, IBM Blade Servers, x86 BladeServers

Overview

HPE BladeSystem provides centralized management and modular infrastructure, offering flexibility, efficiency, and high performance. Its compact and scalable design is suitable for seamless integration, enhancing connectivity while reducing downtime.

HPE BladeSystem is valued for its ability to consolidate infrastructure with reliable and scalable solutions, catering to needs across industries like telecommunications, finance, and education. Its intuitive management and robust connectivity deliver efficient management and power savings. However, improvements are needed in license registration, driver access, KVM integration, and cost effectiveness compared to competitors. Installation and software support require attention, and users seek better cloud integration.

What are HPE BladeSystem's key features?

iLO Remote Management: Enables effective remote server control and monitoring.
Centralized Management: Simplifies infrastructure oversight and reduces administrative load.
High Performance: Delivers efficient operation for demanding applications.
Modular Design: Allows flexible deployment and infrastructure consolidation.
Seamless Integration: Supports smooth integration with existing environments.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from HPE BladeSystem?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses through efficient power and space usage.
Reliability: Minimizes downtime with scalable and dependable performance.
Ease of Deployment: Simplifies setup and configuration processes.
Enhanced Management: Reduces administrative tasks with advanced control features.

HPE BladeSystem sees implementation in sectors like finance and telecommunications, being crucial for virtualization and enterprise applications involving VMware or Hyper-V. It supports operations such as high-availability clustering and data management, effectively maintaining legacy systems and enhancing server management with integrated tools.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Regarding Blade Servers, IBM is a pioneer in blade technology, building the legendary IBM reliability, security and performance into the efficient, flexible blade form factor. IBM continues to drive innovation in blade servers, offering a range of technologies to support the unique demands of your business Ð large or small, in virtually any industry.

Lenovo

Sample Customers

EMIS Health

Merkl IT, Sanitas, Cnam, Generac Power, DIMAR Group, Comune di Messina

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco and others in Blade Servers. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

916,582 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.