HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs Pico Corvil Analytics comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and PICO are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #44 with an average rating of 8.3, while PICO is ranked #71. Additionally, 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PICO users who would recommend it.

HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Read 4 HPE Aruba Networking UXI reviews

770 Views
708 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pico Corvil Analytics

Read 9 Pico Corvil Analytics reviews

1,247 Views
1,060 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Pico Corvil Analytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE Aruba Networking UXI and Pico Corvil Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs. Pico Corvil Analytics Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,785 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

44th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (11th)

Pico Corvil Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

71st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Fabricio Nonato

Solutions Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides seamless network setup and efficient management with potential for security integration improvement

Areas where the HPE Aruba Networking UXI can improve include the integration of SD-WAN and security in a single solution. Now, Aruba has developed an SD-WAN solution that is among the best, alongside WLAN. In Brazil, it's common to see many hospitals and government locations utilizing Aruba solutions. However, Fortinet is well-known here for combining SD-WAN with security in a single box, whereas Aruba and Cisco typically have separate solutions for each. This separation can be expensive for companies in Brazil as they have to acquire multiple boxes. Currently, around 50% of firewall sales in Latin America are from Fortinet, but I believe this trend is changing as Aruba develops its offerings.

Read full review

Ted Hruzd

Founder at AI Fit LLC

Helpful support agents, beneficial issue detection, and high availability

The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite. The product suite could benefit from more out-of-the-box predictive analytics capabilities, such as projecting market or symbol movements. However, it is unclear whether the vendor currently provides this functionality. Users may need to adjust their software to perform such analysis independently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of HP Aruba Networking UX-I is its 24/7 monitoring capability."

"The performance, elasticity, and efficiency of Aruba products have been exceptional."

"Aruba products have significantly improved our network reliability, as none of my teammates have logged a call to Aruba in the past year."

"The analytics features of Corvil are really good... As long as you know what the field is in the message, you can build your metrics based on that field... It means you can do the analytics that you actually care for. You can customize it..."

"It has all the decoders so it's capturing every network packet and it's decoding in real-time and it's giving us latency information in real-time... It's the real-time decoding and getting the latency information statistics that we find the most useful."

"We use the data to analyze how much time we spend within the applications. Then, based on that, we are doing multiple analyses and types of investigations to work on reducing the amount of time spent on the latency, which helps our applications."

"What is most valuable is the ability to troubleshoot when a client complains of spikes in latencies. It gives us the ability to go granular, all the way down to looking at the network packets and analyze them."

"We like the dashboards because they essentially organize all the sessions into one viewpoint."

"The performance metrics are pretty good. We've got everything from the network layer to the actual application layer. We can see what's going on with things like sending time and batching."

"We're able to quickly drill down and find answers to events that are happening in real-time, using Corvil's analytics tools. That's the feature which is most in the spotlight..."

"It allows us to trace the flow. The logic is built sufficiently for us to be able to break down clients' orders, underlying child orders, and execution. Thus, it's a good way for us to trace client flow through a myriad of different internal systems."

More Pico Corvil Analytics pros

Cons

"Some manual administrative tasks still need to be triggered manually, leading to lower efficiency."

"It would be beneficial if the tool offered a less expensive subscription as it is currently costly for our clients."

"Some manual administrative tasks still need to be triggered manually, leading to lower efficiency."

"The analytics feature is very nice, but it's mostly software. We are hoping that it could be embedded in ASICs, so it could be faster."

"While the product is scalable, it's not easy to scale. It needs investment hardware and network bandwidth consideration. It's not something you can just do overnight."

"Before I got the Corvil training... one thing that was not very efficient was that every time you had to create a new stream or a new session from within Corvil... you had to tell it what protocol the message is going to come through and how to correlate messages, etc... After I went for the training, they had already added these nice features in the 9.4 version where it could do auto-discovery... Based on the traffic that it has already seen, it could create sessions on the fly."

"Alerting isn't great... you can only put in one email address in. And that's for all kinds of alerting on the box."

"There is definitely room for improvement in the reporting. We've tried to use the reporting in Corvil but, to me, it feels like a bolt-on, like not a lot of thought has gone into it. The whole interface where you build reports and schedule them is very clunky."

"Overall, the Corvil device needs a little bit of training for people to handle it. If that could be reduced and made more user-friendly, more intuitive, it would be better."

"The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite."

"It's quite difficult to see, sometimes, how hard your Corvil is working. When we had a very busy feed that chucked out a lot of data it wasn't working very well on Corvil. We had to raise a case for it. It turned out to be that, in fact, we were overloading Corvil."

More Pico Corvil Analytics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Corvil has reduced the time it takes us to isolate root causes."

"It is pricey versus its competitors."

"As I am working more with Corvil, it looks like it is improving diagnostic times."

"We bought a box from Corvil and it was $200,000 for one big CNE. Then there are obviously the recurring maintenance fees. The licensing is perpetual but the maintenance fees are not."

"The pricing is very expensive. Corvil could work on the pricing."

"Pico Corvil Analytics is expensive. There are several competitors in the market. Selling this solution to a trading firm might be challenging as there are several other solutions available that can perform basic similar operations, such as using Wireshark and Python scripts to obtain the required values. However, that does not nearly approach the comprehensive end-2-end automated depth of metrics and their correlations that Pico Corvil Analytics provides."

"I like the way they've decoupled the hardware now... Everything's based on the licensing side now. The way they do the packs is fair. It's very flexible in that we're not charged per decoder, we're charged for a certain pack. Whether we use one decoder or 20 decoders, as long as they're in the same pack, there's no extra charge. Expensive but fair is how I'd summarize it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Insurance Company

41%

Healthcare Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

52%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

With the pricing and setup cost and licensing for the HPE Aruba Networking UXI, it depends and varies. Many people use these for a short-term solution just to gather their information. Many leverag...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

They could improve their services. The AI-driven insights of the HPE Aruba UXI for optimizing network operations are pretty comprehensive. There is still room for improvement in that sense, but it ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

I have used the HPE Aruba Networking UXI more in complex types of environments, mainly in enterprise environments. I have used them extensively in healthcare industry where certain areas within hos...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Compared 27% of the time

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Compared 19% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Compared 18% of the time

PRTG Enterprise Monitor vs HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Compared 11% of the time

More HPE Aruba Networking UXI Competitors

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 22% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 17% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 15% of the time

Datadog vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 13% of the time

Alluvio AppResponse vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 12% of the time

More Pico Corvil Analytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

September 2025

Download HPE Aruba Networking UXI product report

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics

September 2025

Download Pico Corvil Analytics product report

Also Known As

No data available

Corvil

Overview

HPE Aruba Networking UXI offers advanced network monitoring features designed to optimize and enhance user experience within diverse environments. It is particularly beneficial for IT teams seeking to diagnose issues quickly and improve network reliability.

HPE Aruba Networking UXI provides valuable insights into network performance by continuously monitoring and analyzing real-time data. It helps organizations identify potential issues before they impact users, empowering IT teams with timely information to make informed decisions. Its user-friendly interface allows seamless navigation and efficient operation, making it a preferred choice for enterprises looking to maximize network efficiency and end-user satisfaction.

What are the top features of HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

Real-Time Monitoring: Delivers constant data analysis for network optimization.
Proactive Alerts: Provides notifications about potential disturbances.
Dashboard Visualization: Offers easy access to key performance indicators.

What benefits should users expect from HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

Improved Network Performance: Optimize reliability and user experience.
Enhanced Troubleshooting: Quick identification and resolution of network issues.
Increased Operational Efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual monitoring tasks.

HPE Aruba Networking UXI is implemented in industries such as healthcare, finance, and education, offering tailored solutions that address specific networking challenges faced in these sectors. Its high adaptability ensures that organizations can effectively meet their operational demands, ensuring dependable and superior network performance.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Corvil transforms Network Data with speed and precision into the powerful real-time truth. Corvil captures, decodes, reassembles, and enriches vast amounts of data in motion, adding analytics and making the resulting enriched data and IT Operations Analytics available to humans, machines and other systems.

PICO

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

NASDAQ, Commerzbank, Pico Quantitative Trading, CME Group, Interactive Data, Tokyo Stock Exchange Inc.

Buyer's Guide

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

September 2025

Free Report: HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs. Pico Corvil Analytics and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs. Pico Corvil Analytics report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.