HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs Pico Corvil Analytics comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and PICO are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #51 with an average rating of 8.5, while PICO is ranked #73. Additionally, 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PICO users who would recommend it.

HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Read 2 HPE Aruba Networking UXI reviews

385 Views
349 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pico Corvil Analytics

Read 9 Pico Corvil Analytics reviews

955 Views
429 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Pico Corvil Analytics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HPE Aruba Networking UXI and Pico Corvil Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs. Pico Corvil Analytics Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,671 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

51st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (11th)

Pico Corvil Analytics

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

73rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

BalvantPatel

Deputy General Manager at Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd

Reliable network operations improved by seamless technology, though efficiency could benefit from reduced manual tasks

Aruba products have significantly improved our network reliability, as none of my teammates have logged a call to Aruba in the past year. The performance, elasticity, and efficiency of Aruba products have been exceptional. Extreme Ethernet fabric technology offers less administrative effort in extending VLANs due to its loop-free environment. We have been satisfied with this robust performance.

Read full review

Ted Hruzd

Founder at AI Fit LLC

Helpful support agents, beneficial issue detection, and high availability

The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite. The product suite could benefit from more out-of-the-box predictive analytics capabilities, such as projecting market or symbol movements. However, it is unclear whether the vendor currently provides this functionality. Users may need to adjust their software to perform such analysis independently.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The performance, elasticity, and efficiency of Aruba products have been exceptional."

"Aruba products have significantly improved our network reliability, as none of my teammates have logged a call to Aruba in the past year."

"The most valuable feature of HP Aruba Networking UX-I is its 24/7 monitoring capability."

"The analytics features of Corvil are really good... As long as you know what the field is in the message, you can build your metrics based on that field... It means you can do the analytics that you actually care for. You can customize it..."

"The performance metrics are pretty good. We've got everything from the network layer to the actual application layer. We can see what's going on with things like sending time and batching."

"It has all the decoders so it's capturing every network packet and it's decoding in real-time and it's giving us latency information in real-time... It's the real-time decoding and getting the latency information statistics that we find the most useful."

"Time-series graphs are very good for performance analysis. We can do comparisons... We can say this is the latency in the last 24 hours, and this was the same 24-hour period a week ago and overlay the two time-series graphs on top of each other, so we can see the difference. That's a really powerful tool for us."

"It allows us to trace the flow. The logic is built sufficiently for us to be able to break down clients' orders, underlying child orders, and execution. Thus, it's a good way for us to trace client flow through a myriad of different internal systems."

"What is most valuable is the ability to troubleshoot when a client complains of spikes in latencies. It gives us the ability to go granular, all the way down to looking at the network packets and analyze them."

"We like the dashboards because they essentially organize all the sessions into one viewpoint."

"We can use CLI with the UI for configuring the new monitoring system, which is good."

More Pico Corvil Analytics pros

Cons

"It would be beneficial if the tool offered a less expensive subscription as it is currently costly for our clients."

"Some manual administrative tasks still need to be triggered manually, leading to lower efficiency."

"The creation of charts and real-time windows was somewhat cumbersome. The vendor's website had an application called App Agent that required improvement. This API was designed to track message rates between microservers ingested into a microservice memory map. It allowed users to monitor the number of transactions that occurred at specific points within the application, and it was quite impressive. However, it had some limitations, and it mainly served as a tool for basic tracking. The protocols it employed could reveal the type of server-to-server communication and the specific order types, but it was not able to provide a more in-depth analysis of the application. The vendor has the potential to integrate application metrics more extensively into their product suite."

"Before I got the Corvil training... one thing that was not very efficient was that every time you had to create a new stream or a new session from within Corvil... you had to tell it what protocol the message is going to come through and how to correlate messages, etc... After I went for the training, they had already added these nice features in the 9.4 version where it could do auto-discovery... Based on the traffic that it has already seen, it could create sessions on the fly."

"Alerting isn't great... you can only put in one email address in. And that's for all kinds of alerting on the box."

"It's quite difficult to see, sometimes, how hard your Corvil is working. When we had a very busy feed that chucked out a lot of data it wasn't working very well on Corvil. We had to raise a case for it. It turned out to be that, in fact, we were overloading Corvil."

"Overall, the Corvil device needs a little bit of training for people to handle it. If that could be reduced and made more user-friendly, more intuitive, it would be better."

"For FIX protocol, maybe we could have built-in configurations for signatures and decoders. Also, for certain protocols, which are newer, we would like to just add the signatures within the decoders itself."

"In terms of performance analysis, if you really want to dig down into the minutiae and get statistics on the important things... that would be the only piece lacking because, in our environment, we have thousands and thousands of symbols. With the architecture that Corvil is built on, it's cumbersome."

"The analytics feature is very nice, but it's mostly software. We are hoping that it could be embedded in ASICs, so it could be faster."

More Pico Corvil Analytics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Pico Corvil Analytics is expensive. There are several competitors in the market. Selling this solution to a trading firm might be challenging as there are several other solutions available that can perform basic similar operations, such as using Wireshark and Python scripts to obtain the required values. However, that does not nearly approach the comprehensive end-2-end automated depth of metrics and their correlations that Pico Corvil Analytics provides."

"Corvil has reduced the time it takes us to isolate root causes."

"It is pricey versus its competitors."

"We bought a box from Corvil and it was $200,000 for one big CNE. Then there are obviously the recurring maintenance fees. The licensing is perpetual but the maintenance fees are not."

"The pricing is very expensive. Corvil could work on the pricing."

"I like the way they've decoupled the hardware now... Everything's based on the licensing side now. The way they do the packs is fair. It's very flexible in that we're not charged per decoder, we're charged for a certain pack. Whether we use one decoder or 20 decoders, as long as they're in the same pack, there's no extra charge. Expensive but fair is how I'd summarize it."

"As I am working more with Corvil, it looks like it is improving diagnostic times."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Insurance Company

67%

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

Hospitality Company

Financial Services Firm

56%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

Aruba UX UI pricing is in the medium range, neither high nor low, making it affordable. Similarly, Extreme campus LAN switches are priced reasonably, in a medium range when compared to Juniper, Cis...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

Some manual administrative tasks still need to be triggered manually, leading to lower efficiency. This room for improvement is especially pertinent in the administrative aspect, although scalabili...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

We use Aruba access points, specifically models 515 and 635, in conjunction with our wireless controller. We also utilize Aruba network switches, specifically the 8325 model, and integrate Extreme ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Compared 61% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Compared 39% of the time

More HPE Aruba Networking UXI Competitors

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 33% of the time

Datadog vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 30% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 20% of the time

NIKSUN NetVCR vs Pico Corvil Analytics

Compared 17% of the time

More Pico Corvil Analytics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

April 2025

Download HPE Aruba Networking UXI product report

Buyer's Guide

Pico Corvil Analytics

April 2025

Download Pico Corvil Analytics product report

Also Known As

No data available

Corvil

Overview

HPE Aruba Networking UXI offers advanced network monitoring features designed to optimize and enhance user experience within diverse environments. It is particularly beneficial for IT teams seeking to diagnose issues quickly and improve network reliability.

HPE Aruba Networking UXI provides valuable insights into network performance by continuously monitoring and analyzing real-time data. It helps organizations identify potential issues before they impact users, empowering IT teams with timely information to make informed decisions. Its user-friendly interface allows seamless navigation and efficient operation, making it a preferred choice for enterprises looking to maximize network efficiency and end-user satisfaction.

What are the top features of HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

Real-Time Monitoring: Delivers constant data analysis for network optimization.
Proactive Alerts: Provides notifications about potential disturbances.
Dashboard Visualization: Offers easy access to key performance indicators.

What benefits should users expect from HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

Improved Network Performance: Optimize reliability and user experience.
Enhanced Troubleshooting: Quick identification and resolution of network issues.
Increased Operational Efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual monitoring tasks.

HPE Aruba Networking UXI is implemented in industries such as healthcare, finance, and education, offering tailored solutions that address specific networking challenges faced in these sectors. Its high adaptability ensures that organizations can effectively meet their operational demands, ensuring dependable and superior network performance.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Corvil transforms Network Data with speed and precision into the powerful real-time truth. Corvil captures, decodes, reassembles, and enriches vast amounts of data in motion, adding analytics and making the resulting enriched data and IT Operations Analytics available to humans, machines and other systems.

PICO

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

NASDAQ, Commerzbank, Pico Quantitative Trading, CME Group, Interactive Data, Tokyo Stock Exchange Inc.

Buyer's Guide

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

April 2025

Free Report: HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs. Pico Corvil Analytics

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs. Pico Corvil Analytics and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs. Pico Corvil Analytics report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.