Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HP Wolf Security vs WatchGuard EPDR comparison

HP and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. HP is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while WatchGuard is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.8. HP holds a 6.3% mindshare in EPP, compared to WatchGuard’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of HP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.
HP Wolf Security
Read 8 HP Wolf Security reviews
  • 12,654 Views
  • 10,503 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
WatchGuard EPDR
Read 35 WatchGuard EPDR reviews
  • 4,776 Views
  • 3,725 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

HP Wolf Security and WatchGuard EPDR are leading cybersecurity solutions. While HP Wolf Security is appreciated for its cost and customer support, WatchGuard EPDR is favored for its feature set, making it a preferred choice despite the potentially higher pricing.

Features: HP Wolf Security is valued for its robust endpoint protection, integration capabilities, and cost-effectiveness. WatchGuard EPDR stands out with advanced threat detection, response features, and comprehensive security options.

Room for Improvement: HP Wolf Security users suggest improvements in reporting capabilities, faster threat detection times, and interface enhancements. WatchGuard EPDR users want better integration with third-party tools, enhanced user management functionality, and simpler administrative tasks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HP Wolf Security is praised for its streamlined deployment and responsive customer service. WatchGuard EPDR, although efficient in deployment, has mixed feedback regarding its support services.

Pricing and ROI: HP Wolf Security is noted for its reasonable setup costs and good ROI, making it a cost-effective solution. WatchGuard EPDR, though offering substantial ROI, is often seen as a higher investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed HP Wolf Security vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report (Updated: August 2025).
Buyer's Guide
HP Wolf Security vs. WatchGuard EPDR
August 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HP Wolf Security
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
20th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
30th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
3.4
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
WatchGuard EPDR
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
11th
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
13th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of HP Wolf Security is 6.3%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard EPDR is 2.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

BH
Adds a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments
The tool's deployment is easy. HP Wolf Security's deployment was a swift process since it was initially compatible with Windows 10, the operating system on both machines. However, when I transitioned to Windows 11, I encountered minor issues that prompted me to delve deeper into Wolf Security to fine-tune security settings according to my preferences. While I mostly used default settings, there was an initial adjustment where I disabled the AI function related to malware. Currently, the system is running smoothly with no reported issues. Adjusting some settings raised concerns about compatibility between HP Wolf Security and Norton 360. Specifically, aspects of HP Wolf Security, such as the virtual machine component, intrigued me, but I hesitated due to potential conflicts. During my investigation, Windows 11 raised a flag, questioning the system's security settings with Norton 360 and HP Wolf Security. However, it seems that they coexist well without causing issues.
Read full review
PaolaLamura - PeerSpot reviewer
While being easy to manage and create reports, the tool also offers a good UI
I rate the ease of use and management of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 an eight on a scale of one to ten. The tool's ability to provide information about the vulnerability is the most impactful feature of the product that has an impact on our company's security posture. Speaking about scenarios where the solution effectively prevented the security breach, I would say that our company sees how the tool blocks when our customers accidentally click on some malware, after which it quarantines that file. My company makes a playbook with the SOAR tool that Panda Adaptive Defense 360 uses to block and isolate attacks. In our company's system, if there is a big event that occurs, then to block the endpoint, we use SOAR with Panda Adaptive Defense 360 to block and isolate attacks or threats. The solution's real-time monitoring has improved our company's ability to detect threats if we use it in our company with Panda SIEMFeeder. Only if in my company there is a need to do some research, prepare a report, or if we want to change the policy, so it is not very often that we use the visualization part of the tool in our company. The reporting and analytics part of the tool has helped with the decision-making in our company since we combine different kinds of logs and situations from different ingestion logs, and we can configure a specific alert. In my company, we use the tool's data search functionality if required to check the information we need. Presently, our company uses the configuration alert and SIEMFeeder in our system. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We've been able to isolate and prevent malicious code from external email attachments and from downloaded internet files. Those are the two big areas that have really made an impact."
"It has prevented thousands of potential threats by encapsulating them within its own vSentry container, thus providing overall protection and integrity of the operating system."
"The isolation feature is the most important because it prevents attacks."
"I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments."
"Our overall security posture has absolutely improved as a result of adding Bromium to our security stack. We continue to have less user impact through a significantly reduced amount of malware infections. It's become a non-event."
"The most valuable feature is the process isolation because it simply stops malware from infecting the machines."
"The feature that stands out the most is that when someone clicks on a link in an email... [if] that link is malicious and it has some malware or keylogger attached to it, when it opens up in that Bromium virtualized browser, there's no chance of it actually being on the machine and running, because as soon as they click that "X" in the upper right-hand side of the browser, everything just vanishes. That is an added plus."
"Now, instead of us having to go through that analysis, they actually give us a monthly report that shows us: "Here's what you got hit with, here's what would have happened, here are the forensics behind the attack," and, obviously, Bromium stopped it."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its device control."
"The dashboard management feature is valuable."
"The product so far has been good at protecting us. We haven't faced a breach."
"The EDR has a high accuracy rate with only a few false positives."
"Their remote management (RMM) is very good."
"It is easy to manage."
"It prevents our users from circumventing security. Everything is password protected so they can't get into it. They can't uninstall it. They can't do anything."
"WatchGuard EPDR improves organization primarily by supporting the IT team rather than the end users directly. It helps IT teams accomplish more with fewer people. One of its standout features is the patch management solution, which allows companies without up-to-date services like WSUS to manage patches for Windows and Linux systems. Additionally, it provides the usual endpoint protection features such as virus and malware protection, application control, and website control."
More WatchGuard EPDR pros
 

Cons

"Room for improvement would be keeping up with the rate of change, specifically on Windows platforms. There are a lot of updates that come out for Microsoft Windows operating systems and the Bromium product needs to be able to keep up quickly with those updates and all the browser updates that are coming out. It's hard to do, but that's really where they need to be more responsive because we end up with problems and then we have to call support to get patches, etc."
"When you deploy, not only is the user asked to reboot their computer, they are also asked to wait for 20 minutes while it sits there and initializes. It definitely impacts the end-user. It takes time away from their day."
"Initial setup was complex. There were many configurations that needed to be worked out with the vendor. The setup required hands-on assistance from Bromium."
"After a major release, there's always a lot of "dust settling." You have to work through all those issues and then you're fine for a while. The problem is, it's stable, it's fine, until the next major release comes out. Then you go back into the cycle again of uncertainty, instability, working through issues until they have patched and remediated all the problems that you're having. It's not unlike any other vendor though"
"I did not find this to be an out-of-the-box solution, it required planning and alignment across many groups."
"Reporting is one of the shortcomings of the product. We do mine the data that's in there from a forensics perspective... It becomes very difficult because you have to spend a lot of time digging through the volumes of data. Reporting is absolutely the biggest shortcoming."
"They need to improve the compatibility with other applications and its stability. It works well with attacks, but it doesn't work well with all software on the clients. There is a lot of troubleshooting and a lot of things that need to be tuned to make it work and not break things."
"The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11."
More HP Wolf Security cons
"The solution should have additional endpoint protection."
"They need to expand their offering of add-ons to enhance capabilities further."
"WatchGuard EPDR does have areas for improvement. One significant gap is the lack of a virtual patching feature integrated into the endpoint security. This would be particularly useful for endpoints running operating systems that are no longer supported, such as Windows 7."
"The gap between the two final conclusions is a problem, whether or not a file is known to be malware or is known to be safe."
"It needs some improvements in the DNS security feature. Currently, it does not have full DNS security. It only has semi-DNS security, which can be improved. It is an important feature for us, and it would be really good if they can improve the DNS security feature. Our group has some plans to change to Cisco AMP, which has features such as DNS, Umbrella. We are trying to learn about Cisco AMP and compare it with Panda."
"For some urgent updates, I don't like the need for the tool to be frequently restarted."
"It needs improvements in its EDR and its ability to manage all the nodes. I'd like better communication between the console and the nodes, so I don't have to remote into each individual machine that's having an issue with the protection."
"The implementation was difficult."
More WatchGuard EPDR cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's pricing is a good value. We only run it on our internet-facing workstations, we don't run it on everything in our environment. We are very selective. Some organizations may want to consider doing something like that to reduce their license count."
"I think the pricing is a good value. All of these security products are always going to be very expensive, but I don't think Bromium is unreasonable. I think Bromium is decently priced. It’s a tiered licensing platform. The more you buy, the cheaper gets per unit, and I think their tiers are very well defined. I think they're fair."
"Pricing is reasonable."
"The product came as a bundle with the machine."
"The pricing is very fair compared to the competition. The licensing is straightforward."
"The licensing is subscription-based and priced well compared to other endpoint security solutions."
"I don't think Panda's license is too expensive, but they're charging more than it's worth. It's a yearly license. For 1,000 endpoints, it's around $18,000."
"Our licensing fee is 1M Euro per month, so it is about 80 Euro's per user."
"The product is available at a high price."
"The licensing costs are not too high. We pay about 20 Euros a year. It's a reasonable amount to pay."
"The price of this solution depends on the number of licenses that you are purchasing."
"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is approximately $30 annually."
"Customers need to pay monthly licensing costs for Panda Security Adaptive Defense, which is not expensive."
More WatchGuard EPDR pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Government
7%
Educational Organization
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Hospitality Company
6%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HP Wolf Security?
The product came as a bundle with the machine.
See all answers
What needs improvement with HP Wolf Security?
The tool behaves differently when I ported to Windows 11.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for HP Wolf Security?
I use HP Wolf Security to add a layer of safety, especially for laptops operating in various environments.
See all answers
What do you like most about WatchGuard EPDR?
The product's most valuable features are the zero-trust application service and its capability to detect threats and attacks.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WatchGuard EPDR?
I think the pricing is normal because we subscribe for three years. Regarding pricing, I am not sure because I did not compare it with other antivirus; maybe it is pricey.
See all answers
What needs improvement with WatchGuard EPDR?
I have no idea if I use some automation functions. I can't find any disadvantages; maybe that is because many companies haven't used it. I would prefer to see some features such as AI in antivirus ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security Logo
Bitdefender Total Security vs HP Wolf Security
Compared 15% of the time
Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security Logo
Norton Small Business vs HP Wolf Security
Compared 15% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs HP Wolf Security
Compared 12% of the time
McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs HP Wolf Security Logo
McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs HP Wolf Security
Compared 9% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business vs HP Wolf Security
Compared 6% of the time
More HP Wolf Security Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WatchGuard EPDR
Compared 17% of the time
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WatchGuard EPDR Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs WatchGuard EPDR
Compared 10% of the time
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WatchGuard EPDR Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs WatchGuard EPDR
Compared 7% of the time
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs WatchGuard EPDR Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs WatchGuard EPDR
Compared 5% of the time
Huntress Managed EDR vs WatchGuard EPDR Logo
Huntress Managed EDR vs WatchGuard EPDR
Compared 2% of the time
More WatchGuard EPDR Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
HP Wolf Security
August 2025
HP Wolf Security reportDownload HP Wolf Security product report
Buyer's Guide
WatchGuard EPDR
July 2025
WatchGuard EPDR reportDownload WatchGuard EPDR product report
 

Also Known As

Bromium vSentry
Panda Adaptive Defense 360
 

Overview

HP Wolf Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that bolsters your organization's cyber-resilience on multiple fronts. With its full-stack security approach, it ensures layered protection from hardware to the cloud, providing a robust defense against cyber threats. HP Wolf Security introduces endpoint isolation, a cutting-edge feature that effectively halts threats that may go unnoticed by Next-Generation Antivirus (NGAV) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems. Moreover, it extends its security coverage to printers, equipping them with advanced detection and self-healing capabilities to further safeguard your digital ecosystem. This integrated solution streamlines IT and security risk management, resulting in fewer alerts and false positives, and reduces the time and effort required for endpoint incident analysis and remediation. Notably, HP Wolf Security prioritizes productivity, allowing you to manage risk without disrupting the user experience, enabling worry-free work from anywhere, and offering rapid IT disaster recovery at scale. 

HP

EDR for continuous monitoring that prevents the execution of unknown processes. Behavioral analysis and detection of IoAs (indicators of attack) scripts, macros, etc. 
Automatic detection and response for targeted attacks and in-memory exploits. Endpoint protection capabilities such as URL filtering, device control and managed firewall. 
Zero-Trust Application and Threat Hunting features delivered as managed services. Lightweight agent and easy-to-use Cloud-based console with detailed reporting.

WatchGuard
 

Sample Customers

Valspar
Indra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd
Buyer's Guide
HP Wolf Security vs. WatchGuard EPDR
August 2025
Free Report: HP Wolf Security vs. WatchGuard EPDR
Find out what your peers are saying about HP Wolf Security vs. WatchGuard EPDR and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our HP Wolf Security vs. WatchGuard EPDR report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.