HiT Software DBMoto vs Qlik Replicate comparison

The compared HiT Software and Qlik solutions aren't in the same category. HiT Software is ranked #23 in DR , and holds a 2.3% mindshare in the category. Qlik is ranked #20 in DI , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of HiT Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

HiT Software DBMoto

Read 2 HiT Software DBMoto reviews

447 Views
107 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Qlik Replicate

Read 18 Qlik Replicate reviews

3,881 Views
2,756 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HiT Software DBMoto

Qlik Replicate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HiT Software DBMoto and Qlik Replicate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Replication solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed HiT Software DBMoto vs. Qlik Replicate Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HiT Software DBMoto vs. Qlik Replicate

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,922 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HiT Software DBMoto

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (23rd)

Qlik Replicate

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (20th)

Mindshare comparison

HiT Software DBMoto and Qlik Replicate aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. HiT Software DBMoto is designed for Data Replication and holds a mindshare of 2.3%, up 0.8% compared to last year.
Qlik Replicate, on the other hand, focuses on Data Integration, holds 2.1% mindshare, down 2.9% since last year.

Data Replication Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
HiT Software DBMoto	2.3%
NetApp Snapshot	9.6%
NetApp SnapMirror	8.8%
Other	79.3%

Data Replication

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Qlik Replicate	2.1%
Informatica PowerCenter	5.3%
SSIS	5.1%
Other	87.5%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

reviewer1077405

Works at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Replication monitor feature is helpful in that it allows a quick view of the status, errors, and results of the last replication

We appreciate the ease of use in this solution. It looks like File Explorer, where you set up your source and targets. Replications are created simply by using the replication wizard. It also has functionality for scheduling, verification, and alerts. The ability to write code for transformations is very useful. Once the replications are set up it is simple to maintain. The Replication monitor is helpful in that it allows a quick view of the status, errors, and results of the last replication. Replication logs and history files are very useful for determining problematic data issues. The transaction latency tool is also helpful for determining how many connections are required for larger files. The replication types that are available are: Refresh Only, Continuous, and Synchronization. We currently use Refresh Only (scheduled refreshes), and Continuous. The source and target table verification is very helpful for running checks. The Replication Monitor is also a great plus, which shows a quick view of the replication status.

Read full review

JohnZacharkan

Senior Architect at SourcEdge

Efficient data replication with exceptional data mapping and recovery capabilities

Qlik Replicate's ability to correctly map and replicate data, especially when converting complex fields like packed decimal fields into integers, stands out. Its unparalleled capability to handle replication with DB2 is a key feature. Additionally, its change data capture capability and ability to recover data when not available enhances the data integration process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"DBMoto was very simple to set up and move our tables to the Oracle DB."

"The most valuable features are that is easy to install and it is user-friendly."

"The system is basically user-driven, mostly operating as a local platform."

"The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data applications."

"The most valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is their change data capture feature."

"We use Qlik Replicate to change data capture of databases in production environments."

"A pretty good series of connectors is one of the best features of Qlik Replicate."

"Support has been great."

"A valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is that you do not need ETL. It's easy to use—you choose two systems and it automatically replicates them. Even if there is no CDC available, if you insert it and update it, and there is nothing to find out, then you can use Qlik Replicate. It's a good product."

"It enables us to transform data at the latest stage rather than in ETL loads, so it's more ELT which is one of the advantages. It is also in near real-time, which brings significant advantage for our embedded analytics approach."

More Qlik Replicate pros

Cons

"Pricing is an area that needs improvement."

"This product would be improved with additional built-in functions for simpler date conversion, as well as for data type transformations."

"It's not possible to replicate the QVC files in data analytics."

"The disadvantage is people are not going for this license because it is not marketed properly."

"There is complexity involved in the licensing part of this system."

"Support-wise, this solution is in need of improvement."

"Support for this product is not great. It needs to be improved."

"The UI and data version control can be improved."

"We'd like better connectivity."

"Some features can also be overly dependent on each other. So, there is room for improvement."

More Qlik Replicate cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Customers pay a license fee yearly."

"I found the price to be quite reasonable."

"Pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

"Unlike Azure, where you pay based on consumption, Qlik Replicate seems to charge per endpoint."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Qlik Replicate's pricing a nine out of ten."

"Qlik Replicate is not expensive, compared to GoldenGate."

"Overall, Qlik is an expensive solution. You need to pay for all additional features that you would like to use."

"Qlik Replicate is mainly suited for large companies. However, it is too costly for small businesses. Its pricing is high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,922 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Qlik Replicate?

The main valuable feature is its real-time change data capture (CDC) capabilities, which process data with minimal latency. There is not much delay. It also performs well with batch-wise data appli...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Qlik Replicate?

Qlik Replicate could be improved in the next release by incorporating more monitoring options to monitor the logs. Currently, log monitoring is not easily accessible, so there should be improvement...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Qlik Replicate?

My customer's main use case for Qlik Replicate is with one of the payment banks in India. We have implemented this Replicate project for their source data migration to cloud solutions. They wanted ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Informatica PowerCenter vs HiT Software DBMoto

Compared 33% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs HiT Software DBMoto

Compared 33% of the time

HCL Integration Platform vs HiT Software DBMoto

Compared 33% of the time

More HiT Software DBMoto Competitors

Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 16% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 16% of the time

Qlik Compose vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 8% of the time

Fivetran vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 7% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Replicate

Compared 5% of the time

More Qlik Replicate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

October 2025

Download HiT Software DBMoto product report

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Replicate

October 2025

Download Qlik Replicate product report

Also Known As

DBMoto

Replicate, Qlik Replicate

Overview

HiT Software DBMoto provides an optimal data replication and Change Data Capture solution based on open standards, which enables an IT crew or systems integrator to implement cost-effective, extensible solutions across heterogeneous databases, high-speed analytic systems/platforms and Cloud-based systems

HiT Software

Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support.

Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.

Qlik

Sample Customers

JAS Forwarding Worldwide, Animal, Financiera Pagos Internacionales C.F., Bur de Credito, Qualitas-IT, EFCO Corporation, Andrews Consulting, ASL Modena, BancAssurance Popolari S.p.A., Banco BICSA, Cheshire County Council, Epson Precision, Ferrari North America

American Cancer Society, Fanzz, SM Retail, Smart Modular, Tangerine Bank, Wellcare

Buyer's Guide

HiT Software DBMoto vs. Qlik Replicate

September 2025

Free Report: HiT Software DBMoto vs. Qlik Replicate

Find out what your peers are saying about HiT Software DBMoto vs. Qlik Replicate and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,922 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HiT Software DBMoto vs. Qlik Replicate report.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.