We performed a comparison between HashiCorp Vault and One Identity Password Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Password Managers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's stable. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten."
"It can still be configured by a separate team other than developers. That's why I think it's more secure."
"It is user-friendly and easy to implement from any application point."
"The product is free and easy to use. It is well documented with an easy implementation process."
"The most valuable feature of HashiCorp Vault is the management of tickets in the pipeline."
"This solution is easy to use and to integrate."
"The solution is stable. It has been working perfectly without any problem."
"We were using it because we have compliance requirements around secret management. Having a secure vault and encrypting data was an additional requirement. When we looked at it first, we were just looking for a vault, like a lockbox. The greatest benefit of HashiCorp is its ability to manage encryption on the fly. It provides encryption of data at rest, in use, in transit, on the fly, and linked with applications, which was really attractive."
"One Identity Password Manager is a stable solution."
"The solution is very customizable."
"It is an absolutely scalable solution...The product is easy to install."
"It does have advantages over the other products that we are seeing. Other products don't have the out-of-the-box OTP option, whereas One Identity Password Manager has the out-of-the-box OTP option. It also has a cloud-based solution for generating OTPs. So, the customers can either opt for their own SMS gateway, or they can use the One Identity OTP option where they don't have to have an SMS gateway. With other products, customers must have their own SMS gateway."
"It provides seamless integration with different types of password modules like temporary access passcode and MFA."
"It is extremely simple to integrate with various systems, including OTP, passwords, and so on because everything is based on our environment."
"What I found most valuable in One Identity Password Manager is its easy use. It's a flexible solution. It also supports many languages, including Arabic."
"I would rate the stability a six out of ten. There are some bugs and glitches. We are in touch with the vendor to resolve them."
"In terms of features, the only thing that I found a little bit hinky was that there was no revocation or deletion on the model we were using. Once in a financial year, a client interacts, and you pay for that client for the year. So, there are just little things like that in the pricing. There should be more clarity around the end of the key. I know there is no system like this. They all are the same. I tested Microsoft, Google, and some others, and none of them really want you to delete a key, which makes sense. You delete a key, and you lose everything that it has wrapped or encrypted, but it's actually just a language. Deletion isn't really deletion. It's really revocation, but overall, HashiCorp Vault ticked all the boxes for us, and I couldn't fault it."
"The product is complicated to install."
"There could be a plugin for the database to change the secret automatically. It would be an efficient feature for password security."
"In my opinion, HashiCorp Vault could improve its user interface. Right now, they don't offer much in terms of a graphical interface, which means you usually have to manage things manually through API calls. I think CyberArk has a better approach because it provides a UI that integrates features across all its components, making it easier, especially for new users or those from organizations with strict licensing policies."
"The solution could be much easier to implement."
"The solution's initial setup process is complicated."
"I would like to see better integration of HashiCorp Vault with SAP products."
"One Identity Password Manager could improve the integration with other technology, it is complex for integrating. There needs to be more connectors or adapters. There is limited out-of-the-box customization."
"An area for improvement in One Identity Password Manager is the management gap since Quest is no longer under Dell, and One Identity is under Quest. The management gap resulted in poor support, which needs improvement."
"The UI needs improvement to match any other standard password manager because it's not very intuitive right now."
"The improvement required is an increase in the number of people who manage the product's support team."
"If there is a self-service option to update the mobile number, it will be much more useful."
"I would like it to be more secure in terms of password storage."
"The software is complex on the backend, and there isn't enough documentation."
More One Identity Password Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
HashiCorp Vault is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Password Managers with 16 reviews while One Identity Password Manager is ranked 15th in Enterprise Password Managers with 7 reviews. HashiCorp Vault is rated 8.2, while One Identity Password Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HashiCorp Vault writes "Useful for machine-to-machine communication and has secret engine feature ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Password Manager writes "An easy-to-use tool that offers its users strong security on the password management front ". HashiCorp Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault, Keeper and Delinea Secret Server, whereas One Identity Password Manager is most compared with Azure Key Vault. See our HashiCorp Vault vs. One Identity Password Manager report.
See our list of best Enterprise Password Managers vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
