Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Hardcat vs QAD Enterprise Asset Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hardcat
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
16th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
QAD Enterprise Asset Manage...
Ranking in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
13th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) category, the mindshare of Hardcat is 1.3%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QAD Enterprise Asset Management is 1.8%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Infor and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM). Updated: April 2025.
850,900 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Hardcat Asset Management
QAD MLS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ball Aerospace, Asset Logistics, Courville Auctioneers, DeKalb County Board Of Health, University of Phoenix, Ernst & Young, UK Ministry of Defence, Southern Metro Fire Rescue, Elcon Corporation, Cox Communications, Bostik, HeathTech Solutions, Canon, Cleomass Solutions, Victoria Police, NSW Police, ICAC, BHP Billiton, ADF, Royal Melbourne Hospital, UNSW, DFAT, 3M, Ford, Ministry Of Defence, United Nations, Boeing, BAE Systems, Crown Resorts, Sheridan, NSW Health, Monash Health, Australian Unity, Catholic Care, Metro Fire Service SA, QLD Fire & Rescue Service and more.. 
SOLAFT
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Infor and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM). Updated: April 2025.
850,900 professionals have used our research since 2012.