HackerOne and Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management compete in cybersecurity, focusing on vulnerability management and external attack surface protection. HackerOne is strong in collaborative security research and community engagement, while Microsoft Defender excels in integrating with Microsoft security solutions and threat intelligence.
Features: HackerOne relies on a network of ethical hackers for vulnerability identification, uses crowd-sourced insights for proactive security, and maintains transparency. Microsoft Defender focuses on automated scanning, internal controls integration, and provides seamless integration with Microsoft tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender benefits from integration with the Microsoft ecosystem, requiring minimal setup and leveraging Microsoft's support channels. HackerOne involves a more detailed initial setup to engage with the security community but offers direct communication with ethical hackers for enhanced problem-solving.
Pricing and ROI: HackerOne has higher initial setup costs due to its collaborative model, promising high ROI through effective vulnerability identification. Microsoft Defender, with potentially lower upfront costs due to existing IT infrastructure usage, ensures high ROI by mitigating risks with integrated tools and threat analytics.
In this era of hybrid work, shadow IT creates an increasingly serious security risk. Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management helps cloud security teams see unknown and unmanaged resources outside the firewall.
We monitor all Attack Surface Management (ASM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
