No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture vs Ignition Cloud Edition comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Gruntwork AWS Terraform Mod...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
61st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Ignition Cloud Edition
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
4th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the AWS Marketplace category, the mindshare of Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ignition Cloud Edition is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AWS Marketplace Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Ignition Cloud Edition0.3%
Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture0.2%
Other99.5%
AWS Marketplace
 

Featured Reviews

Manas Kashyap - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Dev Ops Engineer at 11 East Capital
Infrastructure as code has boosted multi-account deployments but needs less tool lock-in
The best features of Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture are that they offer production-grade option modules that are available for everything I can think of, such as VPC, EKS, RDS, ALB, NLB, or any Lambda functions, as well as the Terragrunt-first architecture, which emphasizes that DRY configs are there, remote states, and multiple account deployment can be used with that. It also maintains security best practices, including default IAM, least privileged right access, secure networking, logging, auditability, and CIS controlled network. Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture has positively impacted my organization, as previously things were done manually, but now we have everything in place. All the Terraform configurations are in the form of infrastructure as code that's available. I find Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture very good for easier management, as our whole infrastructure is there in the form of code. There are fewer chances of error because everything is in a formal structure, infrastructure as code, which can be reviewed by other people as well. The production speed and the deployment speed are quite high; if anything comes up, we don't need to go and check it. We can just write a module inside it, and it will create that thing using the other modules that are there.
Hassana Abubakar - PeerSpot reviewer
Control Systems (Scada) Engineer at Mainstream Energy Solutions Limited
Cloud monitoring has transformed real-time plant control and automated preventive maintenance
There is always room for improvement, and at the moment, I am on the good side. I do not really have a bad side of it or anything that I would like to see changed; I love what I see and I love what I use. One feature that comes to my mind as missing in Ignition Cloud Edition is the user graphics in the user interface. The graphics in the user interface, such as the slider or the shapes for the equipment, can be improved upon. When I am selecting a tank, I should see a real tank, or when I am selecting a breaker, it should look like a real breaker in the field, or a valve or a sensor or a slider. Every other feature, such as the graphs and charts, are cool.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
28%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Healthcare Company
6%
Construction Company
25%
Manufacturing Company
20%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that everything is very straightforward and easy to understand.
What needs improvement with Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture?
Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture can be improved in that the module update process is somewhat of a pain point. As modules evolve, upgrading existing environmen...
What is your primary use case for Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture?
The main use case for Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture is to standardize how our AWS infrastructure is provisioned using Terraform. As our engineering team star...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ignition Cloud Edition?
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing was quite good, as it was straightforward based on how many machines, what kind of hardware we wanted to use, and how many users were needed.
What needs improvement with Ignition Cloud Edition?
Improvements for Ignition Cloud Edition should include the addition of more traditional PLCs-based drivers. I would also suggest that they might launch future Ignition Cloud Edition-based services,...
What is your primary use case for Ignition Cloud Edition?
My main use case for Ignition Cloud Edition is regarding the customer deployment of these Ignition Cloud Edition projects when they do not want to install on the on-premises servers. My main use ca...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Gruntwork AWS Terraform Module Libraries & Reference Architecture vs. Ignition Cloud Edition and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.