Google Kubernetes Engine and Microsoft Defender for Cloud compete in the cloud management space. Google Kubernetes Engine seems to have an advantage in integration with Google's ecosystem and autoscaling capabilities, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud excels in security and multi-cloud support.
Features: Google Kubernetes Engine offers features such as horizontal staging of applications, seamless integration with AWS, GCP, and Azure, and robust auto-scaling capabilities. It simplifies infrastructure management and supports machine learning integration. Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides multi-cloud support, vulnerability assessments, regulatory compliance, dynamic networking, and integration with Microsoft services, along with comprehensive threat protection.
Room for Improvement: Users of Google Kubernetes Engine highlight areas for improvement in security, user interface complexity, and documentation clarity. Enhancements are needed in the backup system and monitoring capabilities. Microsoft Defender for Cloud could enhance recommendation granularity, hybrid environment support, and pricing transparency. Users find compliance metrics complex and desire improvements in threat detection consistency.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Kubernetes Engine is noted for straightforward deployment across public, hybrid, and private cloud infrastructures, though support response could improve. Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers easy deployment and clear support channels across various cloud environments, yet users report occasional response delays and complex licensing.
Pricing and ROI: Google Kubernetes Engine is recognized for competitive pricing and high ROI, owing to efficient resource management. It follows a subscription model aligned with consumption-based pricing. Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides flexible pricing based on module usage and enterprise needs. Despite perceived high costs, its robust ROI reflects its comprehensive security features and integration with Microsoft solutions.
By migrating from AWS to Google Cloud Platform, we have saved a lot of time and money.
Defender proactively indexes and analyzes documents, identifying potential threats even when inactive, enhancing preventative security.
Identifying potential vulnerabilities has helped us avoid costly data losses.
The biggest return on investment is the rapid improvement of security posture.
Since security is critical, we prefer a quicker response time.
The support team was very responsive to queries.
They understand their product, but much like us, they struggle with the finer details, especially with new features.
The autoscaling capabilities of Google Kubernetes Engine have significantly impacted our operations.
We are using infrastructure as a code, so we do not have any scalability issues with Microsoft Defender for Cloud implementation because our cloud automatically does it.
It has multiple licenses and features, covering infrastructures from a hundred to five hundred virtual machines, without any issues.
Defender won't replace our endpoint XDR, but it will likely adapt and support any growth in the Microsoft Cloud space.
If I have 100 replicas of containers and the traffic suddenly pushes to 1,000 within a fraction of a second, the selected machine type must be fast.
Defender's stability has been flawless for us.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is very stable.
Microsoft sometimes changes settings or configurations without transparency.
When looking at the web interface, it feels kind of slow due to the many features involved.
Log observability could be made easier so someone from high school can use it without having technological expertise.
It would be helpful if I could easily find log information in a particular namespace without needing to write certain labels.
Microsoft, in general, could significantly improve its communication and support.
It would be beneficial to streamline recommendations to avoid unnecessary alerts and to refine the severity of alerts based on specific environments or environmental attributes.
The artificial intelligence features could be expanded to allow the system to autonomously manage security issues without needing intervention from admins.
Instead, we only pay for the hardware we use, which results in cost-cutting.
Google is considered cheaper compared to AWS, making it suitable for smaller to medium companies concerning cost.
The on-demand nodes are quite expensive.
Every time we consider expanding usage, we carefully evaluate the necessity due to cost concerns.
We appreciate the licensing approach based on employee count rather than a big enterprise license.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is pricey, especially for Kubernetes clusters.
The most valuable aspect of Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) is its managed nature, which significantly reduces the burden on our platform team.
GKE is easier to understand and use than Elastic Kubernetes Service.
What I find most valuable is the ability to focus solely on my product without worrying about the Kubernetes infrastructure itself.
The most valuable feature for me is the variety of APIs available.
This feature significantly aids in threat detection and enhances the user experience by streamlining security management.
The most valuable feature is the recommendations provided on how to improve security.
Kubernetes Engine is a managed, production-ready environment for deploying containerized applications. It brings our latest innovations in developer productivity, resource efficiency, automated operations, and open source flexibility to accelerate your time to market.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for cloud workloads. It offers real-time visibility into the security posture of cloud environments, enabling organizations to quickly identify and respond to potential threats. With its advanced machine learning capabilities, Microsoft Defender for Cloud can detect and block sophisticated attacks, including zero-day exploits and fileless malware.
The solution also provides automated remediation capabilities, allowing security teams to quickly and easily respond to security incidents. With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, organizations can ensure the security and compliance of their cloud workloads, while reducing the burden on their security teams.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.