We performed a comparison between Global-active Device and JetStream DR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Depend on the global-active device feature of Hitachi Storage Virtualization Operating System (SVOS RF) to ensure continuous operations across multiple locations. Simplify data consistency, availability and protection. Up to three-site geographic protection supports the strictest service levels. Provide your business with the solution trusted by 87% of Fortune 100 financial companies.
JetStream DR combines high performance continuous data replication with the low cost of object storage to enable any organization to have the ability to achieve business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR) at a lower cost without compromising performance. JetStream DR was built for the cloud and designed to eliminate the complexity associated with legacy solutions so organizations can easily reap the benefits of cloud based DR – better performance, more convenient adoption and management, and reduced cost of ownership.
Global-active Device is ranked 34th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software while JetStream DR is ranked 28th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software. Global-active Device is rated 0.0, while JetStream DR is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Global-active Device is most compared with Hitachi TrueCopy, whereas JetStream DR is most compared with VMware SRM, Zerto, VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery and HPE Disaster Recovery Services.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.