GitLab vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

GitLab and Spirent are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitLab is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.6, while Spirent is ranked #47. GitLab holds a 2.8% mindshare in AS, compared to Spirent’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spirent users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 85 GitLab reviews

3,342 Views
2,379 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Spirent CyberFlood

Read 5 Spirent CyberFlood reviews

188 Views
103 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitLab

Spirent CyberFlood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Spirent CyberFlood and GitLab compete in network security and CI/CD platforms. Based on user reviews, GitLab appears more favorable due to its comprehensive features and overall value, despite Spirent CyberFlood receiving praise for its pricing and support.

Features: Spirent CyberFlood offers robust traffic generation, advanced threat simulation capabilities, and detailed network security insights. GitLab provides an integrated DevOps toolset, automated deployment, and efficient version control, making it valuable for DevOps environments.

Room for Improvement: Spirent CyberFlood could improve scalability, integration with other security tools, and interoperability. GitLab users call for optimization of resource-heavy components to enhance performance and streamline its installation process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spirent CyberFlood is known for straightforward deployment but needs better customer service response times. GitLab's deployment process is complex, yet effective customer support is highlighted.

Pricing and ROI: Spirent CyberFlood is recognized for competitive pricing with a good return on investment in security testing. GitLab’s higher cost is justified by its comprehensive CI/CD features, offering significant ROI to those prioritizing agile development.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Spirent CyberFlood

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Application Security Tools

9th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (3rd), DevSecOps (1st)

Spirent CyberFlood

Ranking in Application Security Tools

47th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

31st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitLab is 2.8%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab ( /products/gitlab-reviews ) are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Jos Badimo

Director at BAMS

Test assurance improves compliance and products with good performance

The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one screen most of the time. Even if the system navigates me to another screen, it should effectively return me to the main screen.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CI/CD is very good. The version control system is also good. These are the two features that we use."

"GitLab is scalable and works well with multiple environments."

"Everything is easy to configure and easy to work with."

"I have found the most valuable features of GitLab are the GitClone, GitPush, GitPull, GitMatch, GitMit, GitCommit, and GitStatus."

"We like that we can create branches and then the branches can be reviewed and you can mesh those branches back. You can independently work with your own branch, you don't need to really control the core of other people."

"In terms of impact from using GitLab as an all-in-one DevOps platform, it helped with my project development life cycle."

"When a developer checks in code, it is automatically built and deployed, and automated test cases are also run. We have extensive integration with GitLab, which helps us with source code management. We run the static code analysis using SonarQube."

"GitLab is very useful for pipelines, continuous integration, and continuous deployment. It is also stable."

More GitLab pros

"CyberFlood is flexible."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

Cons

"I've noticed an area for improvement in GitLab, particularly needing to go through many steps to push the code to the repository. Resolving that issue would make the product better. My team quickly fixed it by writing a small script, then double-clicking or enabling the script to take care of the issue. However, that quick fix was from my team and not the GitLab team, so in the next release, if an automatic deployment feature would be available in GitLab, then that would be good because, in Visual Studio, you can do that with just one click of a button."

"The solution could improve by providing more integration into the CI/CD pipeline, an autocomplete search tool, and more supporting documentation."

"GitLab can improve the integration with third-party applications. It could be made easier. Additionally, having API control from my application could be helpful."

"The solution should again offer an on-premises deployment option."

"GitLab's Windows version is yet not available and having this would be an improvement."

"It is a little complex to set up the pipelines within the solution."

"Perhaps the integration could be better."

"Atlassian offers more products than GitLab. GitLab offers source control management, version control and collaboration between developers. Atlassian offers features on top of this as well as more integration points for developers."

More GitLab cons

"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

"The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation."

"The initial setup is not straightforward and can be quite challenging."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As I work in a vast enterprise, I'm unsure about the licensing cost for GitLab. It's the management team that takes care of that."

"GitLab is comparatively expensive, but it provides value because it's feature-rich."

"This is an open-source solution."

"The solution is based on a subscription model and is reasonably priced."

"I don't mind the price because I use the free version."

"In total, I believe we have more than 300 licenses spread over about 100 users, though I can't comment on the costs involved."

"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."

"The solution is based on a licensing model that includes technical support and is paid annually."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

One significant feature we lack is the configuration that enforces code reviews, which simplifies the development life cycle. Unfortunately, this is available only at a higher license level than we...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?

I have been using the solution for a year now. The customers I work with are focused on both custom test assurance and test automation. The solution is utilized in the financial services sector and...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Spirent CyberFlood?

The language barrier and time difference pose significant issues with customer support. The price is competitive. The biggest benefits I find are test assurance, the reliability of the test results...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 24% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 15% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 7% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 76% of the time

Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 24% of the time

More Spirent CyberFlood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

June 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

June 2025

Download Spirent CyberFlood product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

Spirent

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Digicel

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Spirent CyberFlood

June 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. Spirent CyberFlood

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.