GitLab vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

GitLab and Spirent are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitLab is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5, while Spirent is ranked #32. GitLab holds a 2.5% mindshare in AS, compared to Spirent’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spirent users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 86 GitLab reviews

19,204 Views
2,881 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Spirent CyberFlood

Read 5 Spirent CyberFlood reviews

745 Views
298 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitLab

Spirent CyberFlood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Spirent CyberFlood and GitLab compete in network security and CI/CD platforms. Based on user reviews, GitLab appears more favorable due to its comprehensive features and overall value, despite Spirent CyberFlood receiving praise for its pricing and support.

Features: Spirent CyberFlood offers robust traffic generation, advanced threat simulation capabilities, and detailed network security insights. GitLab provides an integrated DevOps toolset, automated deployment, and efficient version control, making it valuable for DevOps environments.

Room for Improvement: Spirent CyberFlood could improve scalability, integration with other security tools, and interoperability. GitLab users call for optimization of resource-heavy components to enhance performance and streamline its installation process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spirent CyberFlood is known for straightforward deployment but needs better customer service response times. GitLab's deployment process is complex, yet effective customer support is highlighted.

Pricing and ROI: Spirent CyberFlood is recognized for competitive pricing with a good return on investment in security testing. GitLab’s higher cost is justified by its comprehensive CI/CD features, offering significant ROI to those prioritizing agile development.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Spirent CyberFlood

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Application Security Tools

11th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

Spirent CyberFlood

Ranking in Application Security Tools

32nd

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

29th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitLab is 2.5%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitLab	2.5%
Spirent CyberFlood	0.3%
Other	97.2%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Jos Badimo

Director at BAMS

Test assurance improves compliance and products with good performance

The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one screen most of the time. Even if the system navigates me to another screen, it should effectively return me to the main screen.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of GitLab is the ability to upload scripts and make changes when needed and then reupload them. Additionally, the solution is user-friendly."

"It speeds up our development, it's faster, safer, and more convenient."

"It is very flexible and easy because you can store data on cloud."

"The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good."

"GitLab is being used as a repository for our codebase and it is a one stop DevOps tool we use in our team."

"For us, Gitlab's most valuable feature is the integration with Cypress. We're using Cypress as an automation tool, so we're using GitLab as a tool for running in parallel."

"The dashboard and interface make it easy to use."

"The solution makes the CI/CD pipelines easy to execute."

More GitLab pros

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

"CyberFlood is flexible."

Cons

"Their RBAC is role-based access, which is fine but not very good."

"GitLab needs to improve the CI/CD functionality because it is not compatible with Jenkins and other tools, as it is not that efficient."

"The user interface could be more user-friendly. We do most of our operations through the website interface but it could be better."

"I would like configuration of a YML file to be done via UI rather than a code file."

"The integration and storage capabilities could be better."

"While GitLab is a great tool for developers, it lacks project planner features. Roadmaps and Gantt charts in GitLab are not as advanced as in Jira, and changing start and end dates is more laborious in GitLab."

"It is a little complex to set up the pipelines within the solution."

"This solution could be improved by adding modifications such as slack notifications."

More GitLab cons

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."

"The initial setup is not straightforward and can be quite challenging."

"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

"The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation."

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."

"GitLab is a free solution to use."

"It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."

"The solution is based on a licensing model that includes technical support and is paid annually."

"The solution is based on a subscription model and is reasonably priced."

"GitLab is an open-source solution."

"It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."

"We are using the free version of GitLab."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	42

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

Regarding improvements, making task management is something that GitLab can potentially make easier, similar to what DevOps or Jira does.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?

I have been using the solution for a year now. The customers I work with are focused on both custom test assurance and test automation. The solution is utilized in the financial services sector and...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Spirent CyberFlood?

The language barrier and time difference pose significant issues with customer support. The price is competitive. The biggest benefits I find are test assurance, the reliability of the test results...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 34% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 13% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 4% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 61% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 26% of the time

Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 13% of the time

More Spirent CyberFlood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

September 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

August 2025

Download Spirent CyberFlood product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing

Overview

GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.

GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.

What are GitLab's most valuable features?

CI/CD Pipeline Management: Streamlines development through automated testing and deployment.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of collaboration and task automation.
Code Merging and Branching: Facilitates smooth code integration and version control.
Security Platform: Provides strong security features for safe development.
Tool Integration: Enhances functionality with diverse tool integration.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Development Speed: Accelerates processes through automation.
Collaboration Ease: Simplifies team interactions and workflow.
Customization Options: Offers extensive personalization for specific needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for users.
Secure Platform: Maintains integrity with robust security features.

In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.

GitLab

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

Spirent

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Digicel

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. Spirent CyberFlood

September 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. Spirent CyberFlood

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.