GitLab vs ReversingLabs comparison

GitLab and ReversingLabs are both solutions in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category. GitLab is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.6, while ReversingLabs is ranked #12 with an average rating of 10.0. GitLab holds a 4.3% mindshare in SCA, compared to ReversingLabs’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ReversingLabs users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 85 GitLab reviews

1,782 Views
748 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

ReversingLabs

Read 4 ReversingLabs reviews

285 Views
80 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitLab

ReversingLabs

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

GitLab and ReversingLabs operate in the domain of software development and security. GitLab appears to have an upper hand in affordability and user support, while ReversingLabs stands out with its robust security capabilities.

Features: GitLab offers continuous integration and deployment capabilities, collaboration tools, and a feature-rich development environment. ReversingLabs provides advanced threat intelligence, file reputation services, and comprehensive risk assessments.

Room for Improvement: GitLab could improve scalability, optimization for large teams, and third-party integrations. ReversingLabs users point to the need for better integration with external security platforms, enhanced user interface, and faster deployment times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab is known for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. ReversingLabs, while thorough in its support, has a more complex deployment process that may require detailed guidance.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab is recognized for cost-effectiveness, offering good ROI with competitive pricing and features. ReversingLabs, though more expensive, is valued for its superior security features, justifying the investment with specialized protection.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. ReversingLabs Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. ReversingLabs

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Application Security Tools

9th

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (6th), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (3rd), DevSecOps (1st)

ReversingLabs

Ranking in Application Security Tools

24th

Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

12th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anti-Malware Tools (18th), Container Security (29th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (13th), Software Supply Chain Security (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category, the mindshare of GitLab is 4.3%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReversingLabs is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab ( /products/gitlab-reviews ) are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Jesse Harris

Principal Solutions Architect at Tanium

Comes with a large sample size and helps t stay on top of emerging threats

The solution helps to stay on top of emerging threats with easy integration with other products. ReversingLabs has a large sample size. The solution needs to improve integrations. I have been using the solution for four to five years. ReversingLabs' stability is excellent. I rate the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a great toolbox where the CI/CD pipeline is the fundamental component, but there are so many other features that you can pull from, which makes it a very powerful tool. My current client is using AWS, and they can, of course, use AWS CodePipeline, but GitLab is much more mature than that, and it also gives you the freedom to decide to go to another platform or have a multi-cloud strategy and things like that. That freedom for me is also very valuable."

"GitLab is scalable and works well with multiple environments."

"By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects."

"Key features allow creation of well-presented Wiki that includes ideas, development, and domains."

"The most valuable features of GitLab are ease of use and highly intuitive UI and performance."

"The dashboard and interface make it easy to use."

"The SaaS setup is impressive, and it has DAST solutioning."

"When a developer checks in code, it is automatically built and deployed, and automated test cases are also run. We have extensive integration with GitLab, which helps us with source code management. We run the static code analysis using SonarQube."

More GitLab pros

"It offers reports on a great many more file types than the other analysis solutions we have. It can give us a more in-depth analysis and better reporting on a larger number of file types. It also gives us a more comprehensive score on a number of things as well, and that's why we're using it as a front-end filter. It gives us more information... It's valuable because of its depth of information, as well as the breadth it gives us. There aren't a lot of tools that cover all of the different file types."

"As far as the malware repository is concerned, it's extensive. It's a good source for finding samples, where we are unable to find them on other channels or by leveraging other sources."

"ReversingLabs has a large sample size."

"The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild."

"As far as static analysis information is concerned, we use most of the information that is available in order to determine whether or not we might be dealing with a malware variant. This includes information that is related to Java rules. This is also related to malware families indicated or specific malicious software variants that are labeled by name."

Cons

"The tool should include a feature that helps to edit the code directly."

"The solution should again offer an on-premises deployment option."

"I would like to see static analysis also embedded in GitLab. That would also help us. If there's something that it does internally by GitLab and then that is already tied up with your pipeline and then it can tell you that you're coding is good or your code is not great. Based on that, it would pass or fail. That should be streamlined. I would think that would help to a greater extent, in terms of having one solution rather than depending on multiple vendors."

"We would like to generate document pages from the sources."

"Expand features to match other tools such as a static code analysis tool so third-party integrations are not required."

"The solution should be more cloud-native and have more cloud-native capabilities and features."

"It would be better if there weren't any outages. There are occasions where we usually see a lot of outages using GitLab. It happens at least once a week or something like that. Whatever pipelines you're running, to check the logs, you need to have a different set of tools like Argus or something like that. If you have pipelines running on GitLab, you need a separate service deployed to view the logs, which is kind of a pain. If the logs can be used conveniently on GitLab, that would be definitely helpful. I'm not talking about the CI/CD pipelines but the back-end services and microservices deployed over GitLab. To view the logs for those microservices, you need to have separate log viewers, which is kind of a pain."

"Based on what I know so far, its integration with Kubernetes is not so good. We have to develop many things to make it work. We have to acquire third-party components to work with Kubernetes."

More GitLab cons

"We would really like further integration with our threat intelligence platform, which is called ThreatConnect. We would also really like further integrations with an endpoint protection product we use called Tanium. The reason I mentioned both of these is that ReversingLabs claims to have extensive integrations with both of them, but they did not work for us."

"I would like to see if we could do a little bit more of bulk uploading of hash sets. Right now, I can only do them individually."

"The solution needs to improve integrations."

"While the company is very helpful, it would be very much appreciated to have extensive proof of concept scripts for the different APIs available, though not for all the APIs that we have purchased. Respective scripts are available, but those scripts which are available are typically not of very high quality."

"The product support could be better at times. Sometimes, the resources that they provide could be of higher quality."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GitLab is a free solution to use."

"Regarding pricing, I would rate GitLab as moderately priced, maybe around a seven or eight out of ten. It could be more flexible for clients but generally offers good value."

"In total, I believe we have more than 300 licenses spread over about 100 users, though I can't comment on the costs involved."

"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."

"This product is not very expensive but the price can be better."

"As I work in a vast enterprise, I'm unsure about the licensing cost for GitLab. It's the management team that takes care of that."

"The open-source version is very good and the commercial version is reasonably priced."

"This is an open-source solution."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"We have a yearly contract based on the number of queries and malicious programs which can be processed."

"Currently, the license number of lookups that we purchased has not been reached yet, because the integration has only recently been completed. However, our usage is expected and planned to increase over the next couple of months."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

One significant feature we lack is the configuration that enforces code reviews, which simplifies the development life cycle. Unfortunately, this is available only at a higher license level than we...

See all answers

What do you like most about ReversingLabs?

ReversingLabs has a large sample size.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ReversingLabs?

The solution needs to improve integrations.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ReversingLabs?

I rate the product a ten out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 24% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 15% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 7% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

VirusTotal vs ReversingLabs

Compared 22% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs ReversingLabs

Compared 12% of the time

Black Duck vs ReversingLabs

Compared 10% of the time

JFrog Xray vs ReversingLabs

Compared 9% of the time

OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox vs ReversingLabs

Compared 8% of the time

More ReversingLabs Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

June 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

ReversingLabs

June 2025

Download ReversingLabs product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

ReversingLabs Titanium, ReversingLabs secure.software

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

ReversingLabs is the trusted authority in software and file security. We provide the modern cybersecurity platform to verify and deliver safe binaries. Trusted by the Fortune 500 and leading cybersecurity vendors, the ReversingLabs Titanium Platform® powers the software supply chain and file security insights, tracking over 35 billion files daily with the ability to deconstruct full software binaries in seconds to minutes. Only ReversingLabs provides that final exam to determine whether a single file or full software binary presents a risk to your organization and your customers.

RL - Trust Delivered.

https://www.reversinglabs.com

ReversingLabs

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Financial services, healthcare, government, manufacturing, oil & gas, telecommunications, information technology

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. ReversingLabs

May 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. ReversingLabs

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. ReversingLabs and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. ReversingLabs report.

See our list of best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors and best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Software Composition Analysis (SCA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.