No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

GitLab Premium vs New Horizons Training Credit Program comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GitLab Premium
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (28th)
New Horizons Training Credi...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
AWS Marketplace (393rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

GitLab Premium and New Horizons Training Credit Program aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. GitLab Premium is designed for Application Security Tools and holds a mindshare of 0.3%.
New Horizons Training Credit Program, on the other hand, focuses on AWS Marketplace, holds 0.2% mindshare, up 0.1% since last year.
Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
GitLab Premium0.3%
SonarQube10.8%
Checkmarx One7.3%
Other81.6%
Application Security Tools
AWS Marketplace Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
New Horizons Training Credit Program0.2%
SettleMint DALP0.4%
Arcus Cloud with single node0.3%
Other99.1%
AWS Marketplace
 

Featured Reviews

Bharadwaj Deepak Mohapatra - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps Engineer at ENTERPRISE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LIMITED
Have managed internal projects efficiently but face challenges with user interface and navigation
When discussing improvements for GitLab Premium, the main area is the GUI. GitHub's GUI is very good, offering many collaboration options and the ability to customize dashboards. GitHub's look and feel is superior, but GitLab Premium's dashboard is very simple. Regarding capabilities lacking in GitLab Premium, the main concern is the GUI. For example, in GitHub, there is a right side profile where settings can be directly accessed, and there is a direct section for developer mode with clear segregation. In GitLab Premium, when accessing users, confusion sometimes arises between root user and main user. There is an option for groups, but it is not direct. When clicking on groups, it goes to another section where groups must be found. This hierarchy could be more straightforward and direct. The biggest drawbacks of GitLab Premium are GUI and configuration. GUI is the primary concern, but other aspects are good.
Use New Horizons Training Credit Program?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
912,022 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
39%
Comms Service Provider
15%
Transportation Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Construction Company
60%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Healthcare Company
9%
Insurance Company
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with GitLab Premium?
It could be better, but now that we have migrated to Siemens Energy, GitLab Premium is being actively looked after by another team. We are just making sure that GitLab Premium administration is bei...
What advice do you have for others considering GitLab Premium?
We were on the desktop, and now GitLab Premium is on cloud. I am not really sure about the purchase process for GitLab Premium. I am a GitLab Premium end-user. I give this product a rating of eight...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab Premium?
GitLab Premium is affordable in terms of pricing, while GitHub is a bit pricier. If working with a much more complex and vast organization at the enterprise level, GitHub would be the choice. If op...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: August 2026.
912,022 professionals have used our research since 2012.